Plagued Consoomers / Consoomer Culture - Because if it has a recogniseable brand on it, I’d buy it!

Correct me if I'm wrong- but either Bronze-Age or Iron-Age China was the first human civilization to learn how to mass manufacture shit (specifically crossbow bolts), right? Modern archeologists and historians collect these crossbow bolts because they represent a very important step in mankind's technological advancement (specifically- paving the way for replaceable parts). The problem is I don't think alot of the plastic consoomer shit has any tangible historical value because mass-manufacturing was already perfected in the Industrial Revolution of the 1800's. You could make the argument that they will eventually have "collector's value" like the Confederate and Zimbabwean dollars that was mass-printed during periods of hyperinflation and are now prized by collectors as having economic and historic relevance but I really don't see that with shit like Funko Pops or Star Wars figurines. As hilarious as it may sound- Bootleg knock-offs of these toys may have a bigger cult following just due to how obscure and bizarre the rebranding can be as a means to skirt international copyright law (See the "Cash Pope" stores they have in Spain, for instance)

when it comes to merchandising/consoomerism and shit, I don't think anyone's going to care about the mass produced garbage like funko pops.

In a century, I think the more quality stuff like those really big and detailed Comics/etc. resin/pewter statues may be worth something. Same with the super High Quality anime stuff. But cheap consumable funkopops are definitely going to be seen as `meh`.

I do think Nendoroids may be worth more than Funkos as time goes on since Nendos are more delicate, visually better, and are more limited.
 
How bad are those truck loyalists, compared to the said Mercedes or Bentley or other luxury car loyalists, or even hardcore JDM fanboys?
this is very culturally specific but in my home country Toyota worshipping is insane. The brand had very big ad campaigns in the 70s and 80s and even now owning a Totoya 4x4 is seen as a status signifier, so much so that if you go to any parking lot near a Venezuelan community in Miami or Texas you might not even see a single vehicle that is not from Toyota, "Toyotero" or "toyobobo" is a straw man for mocking the stereotypical wealthy people who would own toyota suvs, common in self referential humour since is so well established.

And i am not exagerating. Wherever wealthy venezuelans are is going to look like a Toyota concessionaire and you will absolutely hear venezuelans you meet say "toyota is toyota" if you ask them about it. As you'd expect most of them are gonna be lazy fatasses, housewives and dumb nouveu rich looking to show off, theres even a scene of people who live in the city but take their suvs to some rural shithole and get them into mud for no reason except showing off that they infact can get out of mud.

 
Last edited:
How bad are those truck loyalists, compared to the said Mercedes or Bentley or other luxury car loyalists, or even hardcore JDM fanboys?
It really depends on where you're from. If you live in an area where guys actually use trucks for work and/or you have a lot of yee yee brocountry motherfuckers around it can get ridiculous. I've seen more than one heated shouting match over truck brands and I once got to witness two bubbas get into a fist fight on Ram vs GMC. For the most part though? It really isn't that bad on the whole in my experience.
 
I rewatched the original Iron Man a while ago and lackluster villain aside, it's a solid movie in its own right. So they really started off on a strong note. One would have to wonder if it would've gotten as much initial momentum if it had been Thor or Cap whose movie was released first.

Edit: Thinking back on it, Stane really isn't even that bad of a villain. He actually has a personal motivation against Tony, and we see him acting as sort of a mentor figure to him so even the betrayal aspect works. It's mostly the ending with him donning the Iron Monger suit that's kinda dumb and contrived. But as far as MCU villains go, I think he ends up being on the high end of middle-of-the-road.

Marvel also revolutionized the "cinematic universe" by actually maintaining a remarkable sense of consistency and sticking to an overarching plot. Compare this to the X-men movies, which are only nominally set in the same continuity, with how many characters get completely thrown out and recast between movies and now utterly nonsensical the timeline is. And of course compare it to every contemporary attempt to kick off a cinematic universe that inevitably fails after the first movie.

I contend that the main reason the MCU succeeded is the promise of constantly leading to something bigger. That's why everyone makes such a big deal about the post-credits scenes - it's always about what's coming next, how this movie ties into the greater universe. So when Nick Fury showed up at the end of Iron Man talking about the "Avengers initiative", audiences were willing to sit through the mediocre but ultimately inoffensive Cap and Thor 1 to get to the real star of the show, Avengers (which for the record I think is a god-awful movie, but normies have shit taste so of course they eat it up).
I never liked the first Iron Man film for a couple of reasons, most notably how they completely and utterly fucked up Stane.

In the comics, Stane is a HUGE fucking deal. Not first film villain, but end of trilogy endboss style villain.

In the comics, Stane is the central villain for a MASSIVE 40+ epic that lasted about three and a half years. He's a rival industrialist who decides to utterly DESTROY Tony's life, ultimately stealing Tony's company from him and crushing him so utterly and completely that Tony becomes a homeless, utterly hopeless hobo type drunk that no one can find because Stane fucked him so hard without any lube.

The entire Stane Saga (which to this date has never been fully collected due to it's sheer length) predates Frank Miller's Born Again and is considered to be the inspiration for Miller fucking up Daredevil's life like he did in that storyline, as Miller and O'Neill were BFFs.

Reducing Stane to a generic fucking industrialist rival for Tony to beat easily in his VERY FIRST ADVENTURE is a total travesty. Not only do you waste a major villain in such a trivial manner, you also fucking deep six what is arguably one of the MOST ICONIC Iron Man stories ever written.
 
You're not supposed to haul with a Prius. It says so in the manual. The weight limit for riding in them is 800 pounds.
I'd imagine the limiting factor there is wrecking the transmission over time by stressing it beyond what it's designed for.

But if you take it really easy with large loads and only carry them on an infrequent basis, I doubt you'd run into any problems.
 
To a degree, it doesn't matter how the movies do. The shelves are going to be so full of Black Widow action figures and Eternals Funko Pops that Disney is going to make a profit regardless.
Black Widow Marvel Legend sets actually sells and her film's toy wave was a fast seller, to the extent they rushed out a re-issue of the Blonde Black Widow and a more movie accurate (having a bushier and longer beard) Red Guardian as a two-lack.

Eternals is looking to be a huge shit show, as the only figure people seem to want is Robb Stark/Ikkaris. IIRC they made Selma Hayek's figure a chain exclusive that got released a while back when the film and toy line got delayed. But even still, I have not seen the Marvel Legends series in stores yet; the only Eternal toys I've seen are the Lego sets. Rumor has it, that Hasbro knows it's not going to sell so they stuck the entire cast in one contractually obligated wave so they could release them and be done with it instead of piecemeal releasing them in multiple waves.

its all gonna end up dumped in Somalia and Bangladesh alongside all the green shirted bart simpsons, Garfield clocks and Alf memorabilia.

The ad is the product and the product is the ad, its brilliant, in a satanic sort of way. Mini Brands are even more cynical

51FMBL2ibYL._AC_.jpg

s-l1600.jpg

https%3A%2F%2Fspecials-images.forbesimg.com%2Fimageserve%2F60c3d343c31120c5ed48fbef%2F0x0.jpg%3FcropX1%3D0%26cropX2%3D2107%26cropY1%3D347%26cropY2%3D1752


there's a more Laisez Faire attitude towards piracy but i don't know, i live in the thirdest of worlds and in my experience economic crisis and poverty doesn't change people desires for consoom one bit. When Endgame premiered in Venezuela every theater was packed, and there were pretty big lines to buy tickets who had to be limited per person to avoid scalpers. Hilariously there were blackouts in the middle of the screenings because duh, it was literally in the middle of an energy crisis in one of the most fucked economies on earth but people still wanted their MCU.

View attachment 2677725
In a way it gets worse since instead of just going into debt for iphones people start killing each other over them. People suck off american brands even more since they acquire new meaning as status signifiers and it doesn't matter how miserable a country becomes or that 90% of people are poor, even among the poor they will care about status, is quite blackpilling to live through it.

Blocking ads and trackers is the right move though, regardless where you live, if i don't do it i get all the nigger cattle recommendations based on my region, reggaeton up the ass, disgusting shit.
Mini Brands at least work as an item for the purpose of being used as props for larger six and twelve inch toys
 
I have someone in my family with the giant F250 complete with a bunch 2A and Trump shit. Don't get me wrong I'm supporter of 2A and think Trump was the less shit choice but why do you need to advertise what a heterosexual tough guy you are?

I love how he makes fun of my nissan frontier and tells me I can't haul shit with it. I've hauled wood, landscaping tools, and motorcycles all over the backwoods state inhabit. Meanwhile he has a cover over the bed of his truck and is probably as clean as when he bought it.

But yes big truck people are in the same category of consumerism as nu-nerds. They have their little clubs, cute uniforms, and dumb bullshit they slap on their stereotypical vehicles.
I live in a suburb of one of the largest cities in the country and the amount of pick-up trucks around is insane. It's not a working class/blue collar area at all either. I just think that they're ugly money pits. They're meant to be utility vehicles; they're just plain impractical otherwise.

It doesn't help that that the men who drive them seem determined to be as obnoxious and grating as possible.
 
I have someone in my family with the giant F250 complete with a bunch 2A and Trump shit. Don't get me wrong I'm supporter of 2A and think Trump was the less shit choice but why do you need to advertise what a heterosexual tough guy you are?
They think those stickers make liberals angry and rage at their steering wheels

They might inspire a couple of angry Reddit posts if you're very lucky and live in a big city, but you'd never see them, and it's not worth the risk of getting your car keyed in the middle of the night by some bored teenagers anyway
 
They think those stickers make liberals angry and rage at their steering wheels

They might inspire a couple of angry Reddit posts if you're very lucky and live in a big city, but you'd never see them, and it's not worth the risk of getting your car keyed in the middle of the night by some bored teenagers anyway
Democrat stickers do make conservatives mad, on the other hand.

I'm in a red state in a red county. Back in '08 I had a {STATE} Democrat sticker on my car. We know who won that year.

In January of '09 I was minding my own business in the store, walking out to my car when this redneck "gentleman" walks in and asks me if that was my car out there. It was me and him in the parking lot, so yeah it was pretttty obviously my car.

He proceeded to spit, you could hear the spit, "thanks for bringing communism here!" at me.

I told him he was very welcome and made a beeline for my car. In retrospect that might not have been a wise choice, lots of guns around here and he was pretty visibly angry. I got lucky that I was at the door when I said it. I didn’t realize until later that the whole interaction was because of my bumper sticker. What a maroon.

Still haven't seen any of this communism I supposedly single-handedly brought to the country in '08. Thanks Obama.
 
I live in a suburb of one of the largest cities in the country and the amount of pick-up trucks around is insane. It's not a working class/blue collar area at all either. I just think that they're ugly money pits. They're meant to be utility vehicles; they're just plain impractical otherwise.

It doesn't help that that the men who drive them seem determined to be as obnoxious and grating as possible.
The actual "car of the working class" would probably be, like, a 2010 Honda Civic or something. Working class people don't usually drop $60,000+ on a shiny new truck if they won't use it for its purpose. Brand new pickup trucks are the car of the dispirited suburban bro.

Democrat stickers do make conservatives mad, on the other hand.

Bumper sticker: "SNOWFLAKES GET OUT"
Owner of the car: I had a visceral reaction when I saw someone support a local moderate democrat.
 
Trucks are definitely worth touching on. Car companies love to market gigantic pickups as a way for men to (re?)claim the gritty manly man blue collar hunter they wish they had. That prefab suburban house and office job is so emasculating, you know what you really need? A brand new $60,000 pickup truck that gets 15 MPG. After all, just how else are you going to haul around Braxton's hockey equipment? And don't forget the gun/Punisher bumper stickers so everyone REALLY knows just how tough you are.
On a similar note, I think one of the most wasteful car consoomer moves is this trend of white-collar, suburban drivers buying luxury off-road vehicles. I see these pristine $100k + Land Rovers and Mercedes G-Wagons being driven by people who would probably have a heart-attack if you ever suggested driving through a mud puddle, let alone using them for truly rough terrain like they're designed for.
 
He proceeded to spit, you could hear the spit, "thanks for bringing communism here!" at me.
Boomers, lol

Still haven't seen any of this communism I supposedly single-handedly brought to the country in '08. Thanks Obama.
oh no no no please dont do this itt

Bumper stickers are a terrible idea regardless of what's on them, makes your car a target if it's an opinion and t makes your car more recognizable no matter what.
Some people just cover the back of their cars with them, too. I'm sure that the more you have, the more insufferable you are.

But they tend to make me laugh because it's basically schizoposting IRL

On a similar note, I think one of the most wasteful car consoomer moves is this trend of white-collar, suburban drivers buying luxury off-road vehicles. I see these pristine $100k + Land Rovers and Mercedes G-Wagons being driven by people who would probably have a heart-attack if you ever suggested driving through a mud puddle, let alone using them for truly rough terrain like they're designed for.
Fine by me, it means I can get one in great condition a few years down the line for a fraction of the price.
 
oh no no no please dont do this itt


Some people just cover the back of their cars with them, too. I'm sure that the more you have, the more insufferable you are.
Haha, that was sarcasm, do not want communism plzkthx.

There was allegedly a study that showed the more bumper stickers the more likely you were to do road rage. I believe it.
 
Bumper stickers are a terrible idea regardless of what's on them, makes your car a target if it's an opinion and t makes your car more recognizable no matter what.
43d29bd0-148907953_2017771908364919_1443109594748166189_n.png

Haha, that was sarcasm, do not want communism plzkthx.

There was allegedly a study that showed the more bumper stickers the more likely you were to do road rage. I believe it.

Bumper stickers reveal link to road rage

- Matt Kaplan
Bumper stickers such as “Make Love, Not War” and “More Trees, Less Bush” speak volumes about a vehicle's driver — but maybe not in the way they might hope. People who customize their cars with stickers and other adornments are more prone to road rage than other people, according to researchers in Colorado.​
The number of road rage incidents — bouts of aggressive driving such as speeding or tailgating, or confrontations with other motorists — has risen dramatically in recent years. In 1995 the American Automobile Association found 12,000 injuries and 200 deaths were linked to US road rage. In 2008, the numbers are estimated to exceed 25,000 injuries and 370 deaths, and many more road rage incidents, especially those that do not lead to injury, go unrecorded.​
Psychologist William Szlemko and his colleagues at Colorado State University in Fort Collins wondered whether increasingly crowded roads might be contributing to rising tempers. The volume of vehicles on US roads has gone up by 35% since 1987, whereas the road network has swelled by only 1%.​
In humans, as in many other species, overcrowding leads to increased territorial aggression, and the team suspected that this was what was happening on the roads.​
What are you driving at?
Szlemko and his colleagues quizzed hundreds of volunteers about their cars and driving habits. Participants were asked to describe the value and condition of their cars, as well as whether they had personalized them in any way.​
The researchers recorded whether people had added seat covers, bumper stickers, special paint jobs, stereos and even plastic dashboard toys. They also asked questions about how the participants responded to specific driving situations.​
To keep the participants from realizing that the team was collecting information about aggressive driving, questions such as “If someone is driving slow in the fast lane, how angry does this make you?” were interspersed with decoy questions such as “What kind of music do you listen to in the car?”. Szlemko's team used a pre-existing scale called “Use of vehicle to express anger” to diagnose the presence of road rage in their participants.​
People who had a larger number of personalized items on or in their car were 16% more likely to engage in road rage, the researchers report in the journal Applied Social Psychology1.​
Territorial disputes
“The number of territory markers predicted road rage better than vehicle value, condition or any of the things that we normally associate with aggressive driving,” say Szlemko. What's more, only the number of bumper stickers, and not their content, predicted road rage — so "Jesus saves" may be just as worrying to fellow drivers as "Don't mess with Texas".​
Szlemko admits that he is not entirely surprised by the results. “We have to remember that humans are animals too," he says. "It's unrealistic to believe that we should not be territorial.”​
Precious little research has previously attempted to explore drivers' territorial feelings about their cars, says psychologist Graham Fraine at Queensland University's Transport Policy Office in Australia. “This work clearly demonstrates that people will actively defend a space or territory that they feel attached to and have personalized with markers,” Fraine says.​
Szlemko suggests that this territoriality may encourage road rage because drivers are simultaneously in a private space (their car) and a public one (the road). “We think they are forgetting that the public road is not theirs, and are exhibiting territorial behaviour that normally would only be acceptable in personal space,” he says.​
Although the finding will probably help psychologists to identify and potentially prevent road rage, the discovery may apply to other situations besides motoring. "I am curious to see if there is a correlation between marking other types of territories and other forms of aggressive behaviour," says psychologist William Wozniak of the University of Nebraska at Kearney.​
Indeed, a brief glance around your office may reveal the most territorial individuals by the number of personalizing objects present on their desks.​
 
Putting stickers on your paintwork is car fail 101. Most stickers don't come off without removal tools and thinner, some ruin the clearcoat, and all of them will leave marks (at best it'll be a spot where the paint faded unevenly from lack of UV exposure). Putting gimmicky stickers and slogans on your shit is gay enough, it's similar to wearing a slogan T-shirt, but at least put them on the window where they can be scraped off with a razor blade.

It's not a surprise that trucks are everywhere, the F-series has been the overall best selling vehicle for decades IIRC. The GM and Mopar trucks aren't far behind, and for most of the last decade it's been Ford, GM, And Dodge in the top 3 spots. Ford sells over 50% more trucks every year than Toyota or Honda does of their big sellers (the camry and accord).

Christ only knows what all those trucks are for, and even more mysterious is how the used market for those same trucks has managed to stay in a bubble for so long. Amerifats just can't get enough of their stupid oversize trucks.
 
Christ only knows what all those trucks are for, and even more mysterious is how the used market for those same trucks has managed to stay in a bubble for so long. Amerifats just can't get enough of their stupid oversize trucks.
To answer your question to why sales of trucks are significantly higher than Corollas and Accords.
 

Attachments

  • F68B4C07-EF02-4A2C-942C-93FD9119658B.jpeg
    F68B4C07-EF02-4A2C-942C-93FD9119658B.jpeg
    16.7 KB · Views: 199
Back