Crime Critical race theory wasn't the only reason we pulled our daughter from her school

Article Archive

Critical race theory wasn't the only reason we pulled our daughter from her school​

Classrooms across America are reportedly becoming hyperpartisan and overpoliticized.

I cannot speak to how widespread this is, and what its long-term impact will be. But I can say that we have experienced it in the Peoria Unified School District.

There are no do-overs and we only get one shot with our kids’ education. That’s why we as concerned parents need to find out what’s being taught, and when the instruction becomes inappropriate, we owe it to our children to push back.

My family’s story is a good illustration why.

Teachers were free to set the curriculm​

Our 13-year-old daughter was in the seventh grade at Sunset Heights Elementary when on one January afternoon in 2020, she brought home a photo that she had taken of the whiteboard.

Rather than being taught about the Civil Rights Movement, our daughter’s class was exposed to politically charged current events discussions about race, where much of the conversation echoed controversial critical race theory elements.

The Black Lives Matter movement was being lumped in with historical figures like Rosa Parks. That’s how we first became aware that there were some highly politicized and questionable lessons being taught.

We decided to become better informed. We started by reaching out to the teacher and asking her for a copy of her curriculum. When she ignored us, we got the principal involved. We sat down and had meetings with her; ultimately, the only thing we came away with was pushback.

We pushed back. They were told to tone down titles​

Still, we remained persistent. We met with the district superintendent and after weeks of pressing, district officials finally admitted that the district didn’t actually have any written curriculum. Instead, it was allowing teachers to develop their own curriculum by pulling links from websites.

We already knew that school and district officials didn’t take our questions or requests seriously. But we later discovered a lot more when we requested pertinent emails from the district using the Freedom of Information Act. When we read emails from the curriculum director, we realized how deep the issues ran. We were shocked.

Instead of providing transparency, the curriculum director provided the teacher with advice on hiding topics from us, such as to “tone down” titles or “use the same title” for multiple days. The school staff also projected annoyance and frustration for having to engage with parents who had dared to ask to see curriculum. One of them wrote, “I am going to lose my mind.”

The last straw came with a child labor assignment​

The final straw for us came in March 2021, when my husband and I reached out to the school regarding an assignment we believed to be violent and inappropriate for middle school students. It was about deplorable conditions some children faced to illustrate the horrors of America’s industrial revolution.

The teacher instructed the students to select an excerpt that described the deplorable conditions at the time of child labor. Examples included slitting and bleeding out animals in slaughterhouses, and ears literally falling off because of freezing conditions.

The students then had to construct and draw a book cover of one of those conditions. We felt it was emotionally inappropriate for our child and that it didn’t serve a purpose in her education. We asked to have her opt out, which is permitted under Arizona’s Parents Bill of Rights.

In response, the teacher acknowledged our concern and offered to give our daughter an alternate assignment to complete. This would have been a satisfactory outcome to us. But we later found out that the teacher discarded our agreed-upon solutionand gave our daughter the original assignment.

Pay attention, know your rights as a parent​

We decided that this was not a safe environment for our child anymore. Once the teacher breached our trust, we couldn’t in good conscience send our daughter back. So, our eighth-grade daughter started at a new school this year.

The message we’d like other parents to take from our story is to pay close attention. Brush up on your state’s Parents Bill of Rights, if there is one, and exercise it to the fullest.

Our children’s education is crucial in determining their future, and we owe it to them to ensure that it isn’t being traded for political indoctrination.

Amy and Shawn Souza are parents to two schoolchildren and live in Peoria. They wrote this in coordination with Free to Learn, which advocates for K-12 education free from pressure or activist curricula with a political agenda. Reach them at zandcsmom2@gmail.com.
 
I've a feeling CRT would peak more and more people, I'm half a world across from USA and it was literally a local activist whining about how our local paper portrayed CRT as anti-white that I got red-pilled. I read and read her open letter and it made no fucking sense and local redditors were of the "it's not my job to educate you" type so I went to read up on it, and was shocked at the utter lunacy. Fuck the DEI industry.
 
I reached out to the school regarding an assignment we believed to be violent and inappropriate for middle school students. It was about deplorable conditions some children faced to illustrate the horrors of America’s industrial revolution.

The teacher instructed the students to select an excerpt that described the deplorable conditions at the time of child labor. Examples included slitting and bleeding out animals in slaughterhouses, and ears literally falling off because of freezing conditions.

The students then had to construct and draw a book cover of one of those conditions. We felt it was emotionally inappropriate for our child and that it didn’t serve a purpose in her education.
I'm with her on the race baiting CRT shit, but she just sounds like a whiny pussy here.
 
I'm with her on the race baiting CRT shit, but she just sounds like a whiny pussy here.
On one hand, violence is normalized more than sex so you're not exactly wrong...

On the other hand, if the 10 year old girl who got arrested for drawing a picture in the other thread were drawing the kinds of pictures this teacher is asking for (except umprompted), I could understand why the situation were escalated. And if the animals had human names, I'd probably agree with involving the cops in one way or another. If the human name is generic and not of a classmate, don't handcuff the kid, but maybe at least call in the cops to give the parents a house visit...

E: I incorrectly misread the assignment as a merging of animal cruelty and child labor and using the animals to represent the children. I guess the proper interpretation is that children were doing the animal cruelty? (See, that's how outlandish the assignment is to me, an adult asshole on KF. I have to try to kidify it with anthropomorphic animals to make the story make sense). Slit necks for the animals and frozen off ears for the humans? That's a little less bad than naming the dying pig after a kid, I'll admit, but I'd still be concerned if a kid were randomly drawing pictures of injured kids slitting animal throats. Little Invisible Children in training. Minus the sex scandal who am I kidding its a public school in current year.
 
Last edited:
Article said:
The teacher instructed the students to select an excerpt that described the deplorable conditions at the time of child labor. Examples included slitting and bleeding out animals in slaughterhouses, and ears literally falling off because of freezing conditions.

The students then had to construct and draw a book cover of one of those conditions.

What the fuck? How was this shit not called out sooner?
 
The teacher instructed the students to select an excerpt that described the deplorable conditions at the time of child labor. Examples included slitting and bleeding out animals in slaughterhouses, and ears literally falling off because of freezing conditions.

The students then had to construct and draw a book cover of one of those conditions. We felt it was emotionally inappropriate for our child and that it didn’t serve a purpose in her education. We asked to have her opt out, which is permitted under Arizona’s Parents Bill of Rights.

DON YOUR TINFOIL HATS ONE MORE MOMENT I HAD A THUNK.

So I was thinking about how concerned I would be if I saw a kid make that project without context, and then I realized: What if the kid is now an adult and someone shows me it? Without context of course.

Some people look at a fully grown man and go "ugh, he ate glue as a kid? That shows how unqualified he is". What if instead of eating glue, he drew pictures of murderous children and dead animals. And what if instead of telling me the man did it, they showed me the picture? And can we be sure the man himself remembers the context of every school project he did when he was in 8th grade? Would people even care that the teacher told him to do it?

This could be a massive blackmail factory. Well, maybe not blackmail, but reputation destruction. And which kids are most likely to grow into problematic adults who will need this material used against them? The ones with parents who pay attention and try to exercise their right to opt out of inappropriate assignments. Those kids are the ones who most need to have a stockpile of career ending propaganda built up against them.

Fuck it doesn't even have to be a career, would I want to date a man who drew pictures of kids murdering puppies? I mean I know experiments have been done that show women would fuck pedophiles if they're hot enough, but I hope I'm not that shallow. I don't trust the public school system, but also I really love puppies... Without context in a he said she said, can I really take the chance?

Steal their kids. If they won't be brainwashed, end the family line. Eradicate the wrong thinkers.

You may remove your tinfoil now. Thank you.
 
I've a feeling CRT would peak more and more people, I'm half a world across from USA and it was literally a local activist whining about how our local paper portrayed CRT as anti-white that I got red-pilled. I read and read her open letter and it made no fucking sense and local redditors were of the "it's not my job to educate you" type so I went to read up on it, and was shocked at the utter lunacy. Fuck the DEI industry.
Nooo.

You got educated wrong.

GO BACK TO GOOGLE AND FIND THE ARTICLES WE WANT YOU TO READ!
 
I completely fail to see how telling some middle schooler to draw pictures of child labor with crayons is in anyway productive. It's not about being a pussy, it's about what are they supposed to learn from that which you can't learn just from seeing a normal photo or even a text based account of it. Making a copy of a image doesn't say shit about how much you understand history. There's plenty of people who didn't listen to the history lessons, and wouldn't understand shit behind the context of the photos being copied that could do a good job making a decent drawing based on them. On the other there's plenty of book smart kids that know every single little thing about World War 1 & 2 possible, and yet can't draw a picture to save their life.

Also these are middle schoolers, sure they might not be bright, but they're bright enough that they generally don't need to make crayon drawings just to understand a concepts at this point. Hell, they're probably at that point where they're probably calling the assignment gay because it's childish, or whatever the fucking modern equivalent of that is for the Fortnite generation.

I would think a writing assignment would be a far better thing here, not something stupid like where they have to write some fairytale story or something. A simple "explain why child labor's such a bad practice" paper would work, just to gauge which people are following along, and who needs some more explaining. Seems like a far better and more relevant test for such a class to me, but hey, what do I know?
 
Last edited:
Also these are middle schoolers, sure they might not be bright, but they're bright enough that they generally don't need to make crayon drawings just to understand a concepts at this point.
Not to defend the "assignment" of course but here is a counterpoint:
24.png
 
So is everyone eventually.
Yeah that's fair, I guess.
Gen-X seemed more "everything is fucked, not my problem" but even they are resorting to boomerisms as they age.
Hopefully the "Generation Zykalon" meme will hold true in the future.

One Karen pulls out her child. Who gives a fuck what her opinion is.

But it fits the narrative that the school system is falling apart and will make the right literally vibrate with rage.

CRT.

LITERALLY RENT FREE.
Cope, seethe and dilate.
 
The assignment was about The Jungle so I guess they were against the idea of their kid learning about slaughter houses being a thing or just about child labor in general. Since she's saying they had to choose an example from the book I'm guessing they were given a few excerpts from the book describing different jobs kids were doing and this triggered the shit out of the parents. Thing is I have a hard time imagining a teacher putting together excerpts that go into graphic detail about what slaughtering animals looks like, so I suspect the mother is just describing it on her own to make the whole thing sound more terrifying.

Also the graphic thing sounds misleading as the email actually says "graphic organizer".
Mr. ,

If you would not like her to participate in the lesson that is fine. I can provide her an alternative text and a place
to work. It will focus on working conditions during the Industrial Revolution. The lesson comes from the
district approved Discovery Techbook program.

She needs to read pages 1-2, complete the graphic organizer.
So she wasn't needing to draw children having their ears freeze off while working in slaughter houses, but rather make some chart.
2021-11-16 (6).png
2021-11-16 (4).png
One of the other industrial revolution things they were given links to watch if they wanted was a documentary about the Triangle Fire of 1911. Which itself really doesn't sound near as graphic as this woman makes it sound.
 
Back