Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
it was for a short time, and then I imagine null decided it probably wasn't a good idea to put disastrous politics on the front page.
>political users minding their own business and having fun in a specific event thread
>Null: "Imma front page that specific thread"
>Specific thread turns to shit with failed troll attempts and shit bait
>People rightfully tell them to fuck off
>The people that got told to fuck off bitch to jannies/null
>Null: surprisedpikachuface.jpg
>All non-politcal kiwis: "A&H IS WHATS WRONG WITH THIS SITE" #3487563875636783786
>everyone forgets about it after a week

Repeat ad-nauseam. It happened in the 2020 election thread, it happened in the Chauvin thread, and it happened in this thread when it got featured as well.
 
Nope, a mistrial due to a hung jury usually results in a second trial unless the prosecution decides it's not worth it.
Some notes on a second trial.

Prosecution emphatically does not want this.

Everything that came out in this trial can be used, and they can't try a bullshit provocation argument because we -know- there is video of the incident in question. Defense could laser pinpoint every single element of the prosecution. The only reason the prosecution has any chance is because they launched this provocation argument and its evidence at the -very- last minute.

Also, they don't get a new judge in Wisconsin. Stays with the current one.
 
On re-trial after a hung jury, clear as mud...

According to law professor Janet Findlater,

Although the question in Perez was indeed whether a defendant could be retried following a hung jury, nowhere in the unanimous opinion authored by Justice Story, is either double jeopardy or the fifth amendment mentioned. This failure to refer to the Constitution was not inadvertent. In 1824, the hung jury question did not implicate the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment. At that time, the Court adhered to the English common law view that jeopardy does not attach until a verdict is rendered.
But that is no longer the Court’s view. Findlater continues:

Since Perez, however, the Supreme Court has held that jeopardy attaches before a verdict is rendered—specifically when the jury is impaneled and sworn. In doing so, it created an issue that did not obtain when Perez was decided: the effect of the double jeopardy clause on the retrial of cases that abort before verdict. The Court, however, has repeatedly read Perez as if it had established the standard for resolving the extent of the defendant’s double jeopardy protection following a mistrial. Although recently acknowledging the likely inaccuracy of that view, the Court treated the matter as one “of academic interest only.” In so doing, it simply compounded error.
 
Some notes on a second trial.

Prosecution emphatically does not want this.

Everything that came out in this trial can be used, and they can't try a bullshit provocation argument because we -know- there is video of the incident in question. Defense could laser pinpoint every single element of the prosecution. The only reason the prosecution has any chance is because they launched this provocation argument and its evidence at the -very- last minute.

Also, they don't get a new judge in Wisconsin. Stays with the current one.
I'd imagine Schroeder would be even less patient with prosecution bullshit if they went for a second round of this exceptional conduct.
 
Lol someone took Grosstits old twatter handle to redirect to his new one.


dawn1.PNG

dawn2.PNG
 
I know Mrs. Bunny use to hate guns and near fought me red in the face that we would never have a gun in the house, jokes on her I don't listen to stupid ideas. She's now moved from no guns to I can train the kids when they're 12, jokes on her...
Same fam. I have the guns next to me when I'm at my desk. My kids knows about handling firearms and they're under 10.
 
I just got on, what'd I miss?
Kyle pulling numbers out of a bingo spinner. Judge quoting poetry. Now we wait.

Same fam. I have the guns next to me when I'm at my desk. My kids knows about handling firearms and they're under 10.
I shot my first gun before I have memory, and I owned a youth shotgun by 9. You guys need to get on the ball.
 
What? Doesn't that just get you retried with a different jury?

Yes, but the the real trouble is that so many of these 'surprise' witnesses and theories have come out, and all this hidden evidence that Binger was concealing is part of the record. The original complaint as written was so ramshackle that it barely supported prosecution as it was, if they try to bring Kyle up on charges again I don't think it would survive a motion to dismiss right out of the gate with all this new information. The State's own witnesses testified to all the elements of self-defense, precluding the very notion of the State disproving it beyond a shadow of a doubt as a matter of law. In addition, all the shady shit Binger did has been put out in public now in front of everyone, where Binger then acted like a giantic asshole.

If they even try to bring charges against him again after mistrial the accusations of being biased and slimy will be magnified a thousand fold. I don't think the actual DA would want that kind of attention now that Orange Man is gone and the pressure is off.

In short I don't think they would put Kyle on trial again.
 
Lol yup, he's going to be found guilty unless by the grace of God one of those dudes is a /pol/ack that's willing to just sit there through a bunch of vapid whore screeching.
White middle aged women are not exactly straight up communists, typically. It's a fairly right leaning demographic.

I think it could play well for Kyle, especially because he's baby faced as fuck and they saw his mom cry in court. They can empathize with them more than they can empathize with the pedo and the wife beater.
Also the "uwu everyone takes a beating" argument and the "you should just run, you cannot defend yourself" arguments will not play well with women, if they bothered listening.
 
My favourite thing about Grosskreutz is that he puts on this rebellious "fuck the state" antifa persona, then becomes "bought and paid for by the state" as soon as he lands himself in hot water. Real rebellious lying on behalf of government to wrongfully convict a teenager. What a complete hypocrite. What a little bitch boy. Just like all members of antifa who are somehow simultaneously both against the state and agents of it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back