Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%

  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%

  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%

  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%

  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%

  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%

  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%

  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%

  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%
  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Rusty Crab said:
the day we stop calling it "the liberal media" is the day we can finally make some progress.
Click to expand...
glr.png
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: King Possum, spiritofamermaid, Pope Julius IV and 49 others
Orange Man Costume said:
If they admit they're holding out on guilty because John Oliver or Antifa said so then there might be the possibility of replacing them with one of the reserve jurors, because that's outside media.

A dedicated activist juror though would be careful about saying that, and would just bullshit about not being convinced by whatever evidence, like doubling down on the blurred pixels.
Click to expand...
Antifa and BLM activists usually are drop-dead moronic because they never have to answer for their mistakes or lies so they just keep doing whatever they want.

If there's an activist on the jury she's probably lecturing them on how Kyle is evil due to his consumption of capitalism and alt-right media
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Yamma Damma, Zilortha and 9 others
Mr. Brown said:
He put together an all star defence team at his own expense for Rittenhouse and the Rittenhouse team turned him down.
Click to expand...
Probably because, as Barnes saI’d rather publicly, he was trying to use that team to minimise everyone else and put himself at the centre of the case as a result.

Why would you trust a team put together by him?

Especially when he's absolutely the type of guy to hold a grudge.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Gehenna
LeChampion1992 said:
Once they start coming to their blocks and neighborhoods if they don't move out their attitude tends to change on "peaceful protesters".
Click to expand...
Never going to happen.

Shit like this goes down in the urban core of the cities where liberal shit mayors tell the cops to stand down.

For example, I do some work in Vancouver, Washington. Portland is a piece of shit but Vancouver is pretty nice. The place is still liberal but it's the suburban liberal where the families have mortgages and work actual jobs.

If protestors start shit in the suburbs, they will get the SWAT team and riot squad called on them. BLM and it's associated property destruction is easy for the libs to brush off in the cities as the will say its an "uprising" but anything that threatens their precious property values will result in the city council members and mayor getting inundated with phone calls to send in the dogs.

"I support social justice, but..." is their go to.

You go farther into the suburbs and that is where you get a large majority of gun owners. Additionally, you lose decent stuff to loot.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: GenericReviewerDraco, Exterminatus, InteracialBowelSyndrome and 4 others
Mr Bunny said:
Oh fuck, the holdout is that one spic and he's a poltard and thinks not guilty but wants to be a dick about it, so he's taking his time to inform the rest of the jury of his love of Hitler.
Click to expand...
He needs to ensure a future for his children, or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Bunny
FamicomGorby said:
A verdict has to be unanimous, so yes one person can prevent a guilty or not guilty verdict in any case. If the holdout can't be brought around then you have a hung jury.

The prosecution can retry a defendant in the event of a hung jury. However in this case it's possible the judge might grant the defense's motion for mistrial in the event of a hung jury which would mean that Kyle would walk on everything.

So basically, if there's a juror that is adamantly saying Kyle is guilty, they may in effect make it so that that he can walk free anyway.
Click to expand...
So if there is an ideologically-motivated "guilty" hold-out and that happens, they can all say "Kyle only walked on a technicality!"
 
  • Feels
Reactions: teriyakiburns
6MillionCoofs said:
Probably because, as Barnes saI’d rather publicly, he was trying to use that team to minimise everyone else and put himself at the centre of the case as a result.

Why would you trust a team put together by him?

Especially when he's absolutely the type of guy to hold a grudge.
Click to expand...
Watch this interview:
www.youtube.com

Sabotage Afoot in the Kyle Rittenhouse Defense? Viva & Barnes HIGHLIGHT!

The latest in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial and defence. I can smell chicanery from a mile away. And I smell chicanery here. Enjoy!Join this channel to get acce...
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com

He didn't want to be center of the trial, he said his relationship with Alex Jones would have not benefitted Kyle. He was not part of the court team he planned.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Yamma Damma and IAmNotAlpharius
MrJokerRager said:
I have a feeling that Kyle and his family are so burnt out, they might not sue. That guy looks wrecked completely. But he definitely should.
Click to expand...
It'd be pretty pointless, I'm afraid. That niggerfaggot Earl Warren's judgement on NYT v Sullivan made it effectively impossible to sue THE CONSCIENCE OF ARE NATION even when they're provably lying about everything.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Pentex, Corette, C@astrophica and 6 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back