Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 608 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,595
As he said before, there’s no LAW that says he has to start at the bottom and work his way up.
Even if there was, he'd think he only needs to EXPLAIN why that's not the case and judge would award him footsies with teethy women, dick sucking thrice a day to help his disability and ownership of whatever starlet he fancies.
 
Russ has a weird view of the law, he seems to use it as his moral compass. If it’s not illegal then it’s morally right. For instance, if forcing women to sleep with him isn’t illegal then it’s not rape, it’s morally and ethically sound.

There’s no shame in using hookers in Nevada where it’s legal, therefore it’s perfectly moral and if it’s legal everywhere then he is a moral and upstanding citizen everywhere. He boasts about it because it’s not shameful, there is no reason to think that it might be wrong or nasty, it’s legal.

It could be that his birth family are pretty horrified by his boasts of using prostitutes, so if he makes it legal in California they simply can’t have an issue with it, it’s within the law and his morality stands firm.

He thinks what the farms do is immoral, but he has no concept of what that actually means, in his head it means it must be illegal because it’s wrong. He doesn’t like it, it makes him feel bad and therefore there has to be a legal avenue to prove to the world that he is right and we are wrong.

He can explain what happened with Erika, he can justify it, he wasn’t doing anything harmful in his opinion, therefore he cannot have broken any laws and so completely dismisses his conviction.

Famous celebrities turning him down makes him feel bad, therefore their morality is bad, consequently he can deal with this within the law and make it illegal to say no.

It’s all really warped but if you try and perceive how he confuses morality and legality you can make some twisted sense out of his actions.
 
Also minor PL, but I have a doctorate in Knowing Things On The Internet from A University and I know that if someone is telling you that you can make 100K at a job, but they live in a squalid flat and eat children’s cereal at all hours, you need to ask why they haven’t jumped on that job themselves.
Russell is betting nobody knows that fact, or that nobody cares enough to look into his organization.
 
Because he is an exceptional individual (and couldn’t handle the torrent of negative comments he would get).
Maybe he'll do better than we give him credit for. Better as in, he'll last longer than a week.

Jewtube is removing dislikes now. Leaving that shitpile of a bad idea aside, he could petition jt to prevent negative comments as well. Until that horrible day comes, he could hire young, long-legged vixens to screen all comments and filter out any comments that aren't "mm russell suck you your penis" tier levels of appreciation. If she suckers him into agreeing to pay for each comment deleted, now THAT would be a six figure job.

You would just have to watch him on 2x speed though, hardsubbed with captions. He talks so fucking slow.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Andrew Neiman
As someone with a 12 inch penis, I hate it when people make up fake accomplishments on the interweb.
As someone with a 160 IQ and my own harem of porn stars, I too dislike it when people make up accomplishments on the tubes. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to get back to writing my Nobel Prize acceptance speech.
 
You have quite the resume. Former lawyer, former CPA. Last week you were saying that you were an applicant at AGT. Couple months ago you were a future former volunteer firefighter. Do you just make shit up to add credence to your statements?

:chicken:
Looked through his post history. He discusses being several things including experienced with ADA matters, being a paralegal, working on political campaigns, and other vocations.

They could all be true. However, I just get a weird deja vu about some other posters who have their own threads...The people who are obviously lawyers almost never identify themselves as such; it's obvious with how they type and think.

I hope he's being honest and just needs to realize claiming credentials or experience rarely enhances the validity of an argument on here.
 
As someone with a 160 IQ and my own harem of porn stars, I too dislike it when people make up accomplishments on the tubes. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to get back to writing my Nobel Prize acceptance speech.
As someone who has wooed Katy Perry, Arianna Grande, and Taylor Swift with my musical talent, I also hate when people make up accomplishments
 
I couldn't hear you over the sound of me fucking NFL cheerleaders, could you repeat that?
You heard me. Now suck me my penis
07bcd488-8cd1-40fc-be8b-b023bd7c4908-russellgreer.jpg
 
Russ has a weird view of the law, he seems to use it as his moral compass. If it’s not illegal then it’s morally right. For instance, if forcing women to sleep with him isn’t illegal then it’s not rape, it’s morally and ethically sound.

There’s no shame in using hookers in Nevada where it’s legal, therefore it’s perfectly moral and if it’s legal everywhere then he is a moral and upstanding citizen everywhere. He boasts about it because it’s not shameful, there is no reason to think that it might be wrong or nasty, it’s legal.

It could be that his birth family are pretty horrified by his boasts of using prostitutes, so if he makes it legal in California they simply can’t have an issue with it, it’s within the law and his morality stands firm.

He thinks what the farms do is immoral, but he has no concept of what that actually means, in his head it means it must be illegal because it’s wrong. He doesn’t like it, it makes him feel bad and therefore there has to be a legal avenue to prove to the world that he is right and we are wrong.

He can explain what happened with Erika, he can justify it, he wasn’t doing anything harmful in his opinion, therefore he cannot have broken any laws and so completely dismisses his conviction.

Famous celebrities turning him down makes him feel bad, therefore their morality is bad, consequently he can deal with this within the law and make it illegal to say no.

It’s all really warped but if you try and perceive how he confuses morality and legality you can make some twisted sense out of his actions.
I think you're giving him too much credit. Russ thinks whatever he does is morally right and just doesn't want to face any punishments for it (i.e. craigslist hookers, etc). Making his illegal activities legal is less a moral compass than a means to that end.
 
Maybe I just forgot about it, but what's up next for the AGT suit? As in, what does he have to do(or fail at doing) to progress things, such as they can be with a completely unjustifiable claim?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Poop Chute
Last edited:
You have quite the resume. Former lawyer, former CPA. Last week you were saying that you were an applicant at AGT. Couple months ago you were a future former volunteer firefighter. Do you just make shit up to add credence to your statements?

:chicken:
In his defense, nowhere does he say he was a CPA, or was that in some other thread?
 
You have quite the resume. Former lawyer, former CPA. Last week you were saying that you were an applicant at AGT. Couple months ago you were a future former volunteer firefighter. Do you just make shit up to add credence to your statements?

:chicken:

Edit: not CPA, I'm retard
never said i was a lawyer. becoming a CLA is not complicated. i’ve only said i was a campaign manager for a state house rep (again, nothing glamorous), and former CLA. i also wasn’t an applicant for AGT, i don’t recall specifying which dumb reality shows i applied for, and didn’t pass cattle call, but they were American Idol and The Voice if you must know. also never said anything about being a volunteer firefighter. was purposefully vague to not cause issues, but to try and show that i do have some measure of understanding on specific things. all of those things happened over a 12 year timespan, so, not sure why any of them are particularly unbelievable.
 
Back