- Joined
- Jul 28, 2021
>TFW eurocuck is angry
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
>TFW eurocuck is angry
I've only seen this from Posobiec is there any other source of this? I've finally learned to take what he says with a grain of saltDunno if these have been posted yet. This is the defense motion for mistrial. They briefed it in writing.
View attachment 2724962View attachment 2724963View attachment 2724964View attachment 2724965View attachment 2724967View attachment 2724969View attachment 2724970
I got these from the Daily Mail, so I assume they are legitI've only seen this from Posobiec is there any other source of this? I've finally learned to take what he says with a grain of salt
Also didn't Kraus give it away that that they had a better version of the video when he was throwing a fit pointing at his 4K tv when he said "this isn't our version of the video"
That kid showed a fuck of a lot more discipline and restraint than I would have been capable of in the same situation.
I've only seen this from Posobiec is there any other source of this? I've finally learned to take what he says with a grain of salt
Also didn't Kraus give it away that that they had a better version of the video when he was throwing a fit pointing at his 4K tv when he said "this isn't our version of the video"
Prosecutors in Kenosha shooter trial WITHHELD high-definition video evidence from the defense that was 'at the center of their case' and initially shared a lower quality version of drone footage from the night of Kyle Rittenhouse shooting
Prosecutors in the Kenosha shooter trial withheld evidence from the defense that was 'at the center of their case,' only sharing the high-definition drone video footage on which they have hung their prosecution after the trial had concluded, DailyMail.com can reveal.
- Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger initially shared low quality drone footage from the night of the shooting with the defense
- The defense claims Binger only shared the high-definition footage after evidence had closed on Saturday
- According to a motion filed today by the defense, 'The problem is the prosecution gave the defense a compressed version of the video'
- 'What that means is the video provided to the defense was not as clear as the video kept by the state,' the motion states
- Lawyers for Rittenhouse filed their motion for mistrial with prejudice based on this and several other grounds
Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger played the enhanced drone footage to the jury during his closing statements and claimed that it showed Rittenhouse 'pointing his gun' at people – an assertion that opened the door to the state claiming Rittenhouse provoked the violence of the night of August 25, 2020.
Now, in the motion obtained by DailyMail.com, Rittenhouse's defense insist that the state only shared it with the defense after evidence had closed on Saturday November 13.
This is one just one of the grounds on which they have made a motion for a mistrial with prejudice filed by Kyle Rittenhouse's defense Monday afternoon.
According to the motion, 'On November 5, 2021, the fifth day of trial on this case, the prosecution turned over to the defense footage of a drone video which captured some of the incident from August 25, 2020.
'The problem is the prosecution gave the defense a compressed version of the video. What that means is the video provided to the defense was not as clear as the video kept by the state.'
The motion goes onto explain that the file size of the defense video is just 3.6MB while the prosecution's is 11.2MB.
The motion states that this larger file was not provided to the defense 'until after the trial concluded'
It reads, 'During the jury instructions conference, the defense played their version of the video for the court to review. The state indicated their version was much clearer and had their tech person come into court to have the court review their clearer video. The video is the same, the resolution of that video, however, was not.'
In fact, the state did not provide the larger file until two days before closing arguments and after the evidence had been closed.
The motion states, 'As it relates to the compressed drone footage. The prosecution should be required to explain to the court why they did not copy the footage for the defendant with the same quality as their copy
'The video footage has been at the center of this case. The idea that the state would provide lesser quality footage and then use that footage as a linchpin in their case is the very reason they requested and were granted the provocation instruction by the Court.'
Lawyers for Rittenhouse filed their motion for mistrial with prejudice based on this and several other grounds.
They had already raised the issue of 'prosecutorial misconduct' and 'over-reach' for Binger's behavior when he 'violated' Rittenhouse's constitutional right to remain silent by suggesting that he had done so that he could 'tailor' his story to fit the facts as they emerged during trial.
And for his bid to enter evidence into trial that had already been excluded by the judge. Both transgressions came the day that Rittenhouse testified and saw Judge Schroeder furiously admonish the prosecutor telling him, 'This better stop.'
Now, in the motion filed Monday, Rittenhouse's defense team has re-iterated Corey Chirafisi's contention in court that Binger's behavior was 'clearly intentional' and 'prejudicial.'
For his part Judge Schroeder did not accept Binger's insistence that he acted 'in good faith' snapping, 'I don't believe you.'
According to the defense, 'The failure to provide the same quality footage in this particular case is intentional and clearly prejudices the defendant.'
The jury is now out for deliberation to determine the fate of Kyle Rittenhouse.
thanks I tried to search for articles and couldn't find any... lmfao DailyMail and NY Post are the only MSM reporting on itI got these from the Daily Mail, so I assume they are legit
He's either trying to intimidate Kyle the entire time (so he's a fat fucking bully like his dead kid) or he's waiting to see if the jury "gets it wrong" and then he'll try something. Either way, I'd be trying to get the judge to force his failure of an ass somewhere else.https://youtu.be/whA5p5qmJrc?t=1842 should be the right timestamp. 30:40 - 32:00
The day they think there's no way to stop it, of course. Bonus points if they can brainwash enough white people into thinking that implementing it will be a good thing.Does this get any more blatant ? When will they publicly admit to the Kalergi Plan ?
Telling them won't work, they literally believe Stalin was pro LGBTP and any evidence to the contrary is literally a CIA psyop to make their glorious Marxist revolution fail.Lmao this bitch used USSR symbol in the bio. SOMEBODY TELL THEM
They don't actually believe that. That's why they're so highly strung. Imagine right now someone said "you are not a real man." To you. You'd just laugh it off. Because of course you are. Trannies look in a mirror and are confronted with reality every day. They know what they are. They just try to deny it.Well... They are the ones who are able to look into the mirror, see a balding ogre with a 5 o'clock shadow and still believe that they're women. In a normal world they would be sent to the asylum.
A film by Clint Eastwood
I like the ending where Kyle is set free and the Gobberment uses him as a anti-riot asset. Whenever there is a level 5 chimpout they deploy clones of Kyle to disperse crowds.
Why would they do that when the rioters work for the Gobberment?I like the ending where Kyle is set free and the Gobberment uses him as a anti-riot asset. Whenever there is a level 5 chimpout they deploy clones of Kyle to disperse crowds.
Wrong mysterious drone footage. There's somehow two examples of it in this case.So, do I understand situation correctly?
FBI was sitting on most likely 4k drone footage of the scene, then prosecution got a low res version of that, and in the middle of the trial defense got an even lower res version from them. Original footage was conveniently lost.
Then prosecution used garbage quality footage to produce bigfoot hocus pocus out of focus image to gaslight judge with it to manufacture provocation.
On the original footage you would most likely be able to clearly see Ziminski ambushing Kyle with a handgun, exonerating Kyle.
Question. Why isn't Binger hanging from the lamp post outside the courthouse?
Gotta look impartial.Why would they do that when the rioters work for the Gobberment?
X to doubt.Each of those likes is an actual person.
The question still remains.Wrong mysterious drone footage. There's somehow two examples of it in this case.
Anyone who looks at those crocs and sees a cold murderer and not a dork is out of their mind.
People trying to discredit black defendants have no trouble finding pictures of them shirtless, pointing an illegally owned pistol at the camera, finger on the trigger, holding a fist full of cash. Or throwing gang signs and holding a bong.Mind you - each of these Twitter accounts (many with blue check marks) have thousands and thousands of likes. Each of those likes is an actual person. And yes, the death threats on kyles life has already begun.
View attachment 2725025View attachment 2725026View attachment 2725027View attachment 2725028View attachment 2725029View attachment 2725030View attachment 2725031
This one just made me laugh tho.
View attachment 2725045
Anyone who looks at those crocs and sees a cold murderer and not a dork is out of their mind.
the legal ramifications are still there, but the violating drone footage is from some OTHER unknown source.The question still remains.
We can start taking about pizza again to slow it down. I'm sure the jannies will love it.>Fifteen straight pages on a particular topic
Guy who's been away for a couple of hours walks in
>Hey guys, I'm not sure if you've seen (thing they're already talking about)
It must end.