Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
For all the talks about the judge being biased towards Kyle, he has been painfully passive, and caved multiple times to Binger's requests
The judge has allowed misconduct after misconduct by the prosecution which should mandate a dismissal with prejudice. The fact this has gone a minute beyond when he chewed them out during Kyle's testimony proves his bias isn't with Kyle and isn't towards justice.
 
They are letting the Jury watch the Glowie video with the magic pixels that was found 2 days before closing statements. What is this trash.
This is a case of closing the barn door after the horses have left, and gone to the great beyond in the sky. Too late, too little, it doesn't remotely fix that the defense didn't have this all along.
The judge has allowed misconduct after misconduct by the prosecution which should mandate a dismissal with prejudice. The fact this has gone a minute beyond when he chewed them out during Kyle's testimony proves his bias isn't with Kyle and isn't towards justice.
To quote Mr. Blonde, "you gonna bark all day little doggie, or you gonna bite?" So far, he is all bark and no bite.
 
I'm not convinced most of the people in this thread are watching the same trial as I am at this point. It's ridiculous.
Yeah some lukewarm IQ posting currently.

Jury asked if they need to request pieces of evidence by number, seems like they haven't actually asked yet though.
Defence raised their point to keep it in play and we're clearly getting back to that. Judge sounded pretty interested in the user manual which the prosecutorz have a problem with so no, he hasn't cucked out yet.
 
holy fuck man.jpg

jesus christ.
 
Whoa what? There's a back and forth in court and this is a complicated trial with no slam dunks on either side? Whaaaat? Juries don't reach a verdict immediately? Crazy.
That should NOT have been the case for this case and you know it.

This case should have been 5 minutes long and the prosecuters laughed out of the courtroom.
 
The girl in the pictures is McKenzie Rittenhouse, who was dating Dominick Black. Given Dominick was 20 years old at the time of the shooting, it's fairly safe to assume she is not 16.

Is a 16 year old dating a 20 year old even THAT big a deal? Admittedly I don't know the AoC in Wisconsin, nor honestly the cultural opinion on relationships between people of those ages, but depending on how they know one another, I don't really know if Black being 20 precludes McKenzie being 16.

What are the realistic consequences of that for Binger in terms of discipline?

Ideally: Death penalty.

Realistically: Disbarment/arrest(?)

In Binger's case: Maybe nothing. Depends how many strings can be pulled.

You're talking about the fact that she looks like a seven year old boy in a wig? Yeah, agreed. Some of you guys need to take a serious, introspective look at yourselves.

How much oestrogen is in the water in the US that seven year old boys look like that? Nigga c'mon.
 
I do not understand the doomering once again. Yeah, they're still arguing with holdouts. It'll be a while. Wow.
The judge hasn't even read the mistrial motion and is more concerned about media coverage than the fucking illegal shit the pros is doing and is going soft on them because he doesn't want to seem "racist".
Jury is retarded and probably scared of being victimized by rioters.
Just isn't looking good.
 
I'm doomering because Schroeder hasn't even considered the defense's position and has been all sorts of assblasted about the media.

I'll get over myself but god I hate Binger.
As Rackets is explaining, Schroeder has other cases to handle as well, so he hasn't had a chance to fully read the motion for mistrial. There's no reason to pause the jury's deliberation process so he can decide on mistrial.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back