- Joined
- May 2, 2020
As if testimony under oath means anything in a Godless, morally-bankrupt America.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's not under oath.He's like a fucking small child! You've done fucked up! You LIED UNDER AN OATH!
Kraus argued that it was the woman's fault that the video got compressed, that it's the same file as the HD version, but it was altered on her computer. The woman argues that that can't be true, the two files have different names, they were never the same file, the HD was altered on the state's end, and they sent her the compressed version under a different title.I don't get it why are they arguing about filenames?
It's literally a "dog ate my homework" excuse, I don't believe even Binger was this stupid, it's literally just a lie. They intentionally did this to deny Rittenhouse a fair trial, a criminal act.Maybe jurors these days should be required to sit through some basic tech literacy lecture...don't they get advice on how to look at evidence correctly or whatever? So painful to hear the excuses about 'accidentally compressing' videos, it's like that thing students do where they intentionally corrupt a file to get an extension on an assignment. At least the woman speaking right now is savvy enough to both know and explain the situation.
I also predict prosecution saying that RENAMING FILES ruins them or something.
Oh. But it's still pretty awful and is valid for mistrial, no?He's not under oath.
Oh yeah? I have one pedobyte, named RosenbaumMy hard drive has the capacity of 4 millipedes
takes 2 to tangoI find it poetic that one fat destroyed another fat.