- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
A mistrial without prejudice would still be ok for Kyle, because there's absolutely no fucking way that the DA brings this case up again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just don't see how it could reasonably be done without prejudice if it's done on the basis of the correct evidence not being presented (not to mention the constitutional violations previously raised). The judge is declining the decide at this time so he won't address it for now, but for fuck's sake, they withheld evidence.Defense is offering a 'compromise', Mistrial without prejudice. Which is good by my book, since I have pointed out multiple times that the Defense can't pull this shit twice.
These are different motionsNOW THE DEFENSE IS OKAY WITH A MISTRIAL WIHTOUT PREJUDICE
I AM GOING TO EXPLODE
I'm fuckin stunned. The incompetence, holy shit. I hope this is some kind of 43D parcheesi or something that I'm too rarted to be picking up on.WITHOUT PREJUDICE WHAT THE FUCK!
It is an elective action and not something done by default. Suck my dick.
Defense is offering a 'compromise', Mistrial without prejudice. Which is good by my book, since I have pointed out multiple times that the Defense can't pull this shit twice.
Yeah but it would be nice if we could set some precedent before the next riot season.A mistrial without prejudice would still be ok for Kyle, because there's absolutely no fucking way that the DA brings this case up again.
I don’t think I’ve ever even seen a .mkv file beforeYup hes fucked, the average tard can't even open a .mkv file
A mistrial without prejudice would still be ok for Kyle, because there's absolutely no fucking way that the DA brings this case up again.
The full motion is still separate and in consideration, you retardsLmao without prejudice.
Public right wingers in a nutshell. You will always lose.
Now go throw another fag party at Trump's place while claiming you're conservatives.
Its their attempt to get the judge on board. Knowing that if they have all the evidence that the prosecution has they will have a much harder time proving any of their elements.I just don't see how it could reasonably be done without prejudice if it's done on the basis of the correct evidence not being presented (not to mention the constitutional violations previously raised). The judge is declining the decide at this time so he won't address it for now, but for fuck's sake, they withheld evidence.