Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
More like the pitcher is blatantly trying to beam the batter in the head, and the umpire keeps pretending they didn't see it.
Worse the umpire sees it but DOESN'T WANT TO FUCKING CALL IT
"But uh yeah I don't know how to throw a ball. Nobody in our office knows how to throw a ball"
*silence from batter*
"Oh well okay then. Go ahead and do it again"
 
However long it will take the women to nag and cuck the men into a guilty verdict.

I don't see them standing their ground harder than the majority of men and nonwhites who are against them, especially if the women are making nonsense arguments as cover for a general belief the media gave them.

My impression this whole time with the instruction/video requests from the jury, is that the jury is having a typical reddit argument, where the guilty side gets proven wrong on their main paint, they then move their goalposts back further to another point, defends that until they're proven wrong, and they repeat until they have nothing left or are proven right finally.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JohnDoe
Jury update. No word on which version they're watching.
Screenshot_1.png
 
Because they can't do the same tricks twice. No, seriously.

Everyone would already have all the evidence, in their proper formats, including a few bits that disprove key points that weren't there before. The prosecution's shit was all about obfuscating the evidence from the defense so they could try anything.

That will not work on round two, when the defense has all the evidence already -and- knows the prosecution's only trump card.
I couldn't agree more. The case was blown wide open by anything that has happened. Next time, violations of curfew or Kyle having that rifle would be off the table. It would boil down to the shootings and the shootings only and -ironically- prosecution have already taken their best shots and all they have is the insinuation of a provocation that's entirely imaginary and has flimsy evidence at best. Richards and 47 know what's coming and can snipe that shit down based on what happens in the next trial or by using stuff from this trial. Every argument the prosecution can bring, they know in advance. They can literally just repeat what they did this time, while the prosecution has nothing to stop them.
The prosecution, on the other hand, could change gears and try to hit Kyle with yet another narrative they pulled from their ass ... but to what end? Anyone will be able to see through that shit and it will be utter desperation.

Mistrial would suck, but it sucks a lot less than a guilty verdict. And I think 47 asked for a mistrial without prejudice, cause he knows the judge will never say yes to a mistiral with prejudice based on how high profile this case is.

trial results tier list
top tier: Full acquittal
good tier: Mistrial with Prejudice -or- Mistrial without prejudice and a retrial with full acquittal
shit tier: guilty of some charges
blackpill tier: guilty on all charges
blackpill doomer tier: mistrial and guilty on all charges on retrial
blue ball tier: mistrial without prejudice followed by a mistrial with prejudice
 
I actually get to flex some autism? HandBrake is a program used to re-encode a video into a different codec. You can also just re-encode it under the same codec, or a different one, under a different quality to try and preserve space.

View attachment 2726107

It doesn't have a default filename for an export/render, you have to specify that when you specify the destination, at least in the version I use.
1637182620894.png


Current version adds -1 to the end of the filename, and tosses it by default into your videos folder.
 
If he transcoded it from one lossy video codec to another using handbrake it would lose some of its original data, but 11 MB to 4 MB seems like a lot. This had to be intentional.
The motion the defense filed indicated the resolution was significantly reduced, like someone chose the wrong output preset if using a tool like Handbrake.
 
Handbrake is used for video encoding
If you want to make an .MPV file to a .WAV not too sure about the compression aspects on videos
Any conversion from .MPV to .MKV will have compression unless you pick a VERY specific set of standards and protocols. With Handbrake you have to be a goddamn wizard in setting video transcoding options as it's not something simple to do and the settings are baffling.

his is why audiophiles go apeshit over FLAC and say MP3 is for plebs: You lose (Loss) in the transcoding.
 
The Handbrake thing isn't a smoking gun though, not if the file size/name thing wasn't. Krauss will just feign ignorance and go on another 10 minute rant, and the judge will give in because he doesn't know wtf anyone is talking about.
Nothing is a smoking gun if the defense won't call it a smoking gun, not even a literal smoking gun
 
Worse the umpire sees it but DOESN'T WANT TO FUCKING CALL IT
"But uh yeah I don't know how to throw a ball. Nobody in our office knows how to throw a ball"
*silence from batter*
"Oh well okay then. Go ahead and do it again"
Yeah that's definitely an issue. I've noticed a trend where the defense seems to like making their case once, and then deciding that's enough and not choosing to hammer it in after the prosecution spends several minutes speaking unopposed in an attempt to muddy things up.

You'd think they'd have caught on to the pattern by now, but alas...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back