Her DM says, "...Amber Reid...is the name of the channel that copyrighted you." She then says, "So if you're going to...accuse me of striking your channel..."
Orko then proves that amber reid is the channel that struck Apathetic Faxx and got that channel deleted.
She's lying. She did indeed strike him.
Orko TV doesn't have any copyright claims, or strikes, against him by Amber.
He posted in his community tab that Amber was striking reaction channels now, referring to Apathetic Faxx, but he didn't state that he meant Apathetic Faxx explicitly.
Everyone assumed the screenshot he shared of a video being unavailable to view due to copyright claim by amber reid was about his content. It was, in fact, what Orko screenshot when clicking on a link to one of Apathetic Faxx's uploads.
Amber heard the rumours of a strike against Orko, DM'd him, blaming another channel, 'amber reid' for his imaginary strike. After all, she's Amberlynn, not Amber.
Not having put in a copyright claim before, she forgot that her adsense account is in her actual legal name, Amber Reid, as seen by Orko on the link to Apathetic Faxx's affected uploads.
Amber most definitely copyright claimed, I think it was eight, Apathetic Faxx uploads.
Point being she didn't copyright claim or strike Orko, she did lie to him, and he outed her for it in his most recent video.
E sp