There’s really no rationale behind dividing the movement and attacking wignats. There’s ultimately no logical reason Nick and Groypers shouldn’t see Striker or Woods as at the very least neutral compatriots or fellow travelers. Instead it is this constant and incessant relentless vitriol and inability to even remotely be charitable.
It doesn’t make any sense politically. Just don’t comment on them. Ignore them. That’s what Tucker and Trump did to Nick Fuentes, they pretend he doesn’t exist. I’m sure Trump probably wanted to call him a Nazi and Holocaust denying bigot and anti semite, but he decided to be silent. Why attack people who are ultimately voting for you and fighting a common enemy?
The notion that wignats and Groypers don’t have common enemies and concerns is just objectively wrong, they share concerns that are unique to them and are not shared by most of the rest of the political spectrum. For a movement that is already marginalized and underground it makes little sense to pick faggoty fights when you can just shut your faggot mouth and be a decent actor in a common political struggle.
Instead Nick cozies up to weirdos like Milo and Q tards and what are basically meth addled criminals in Chaggot and Chicken Andy. Of course, those people aren’t wiggers or subhumans. Or Gunt with his illegitimate kid. It’s laughable. Say what you will about those people, but they’re clearly fucking wiggers of the lowest order.
But no it’s Striker and Keith Woods and Borzoi who are worthless bad actors. I’m not a huge fan of TRS but their content has been consistently intelligent on and off and even if it’s not sometimes, it is definitely VASTLY higher quality than anything you’ll see on Cozy.tv 95% of the time.
There’s no reason for Nick and Beardson to act like kikes and appoint themselves the deciders of who is and isn’t kosher and “really in the movement” but they do. And it’s likely that they are and always have been some kind of controlled opposition to defang the passion and radicalism of the movement and make it weak, controlled, and ultimately castrated of its potential to actually do anything of real authentic meaning.
If they aren’t controlled op, I would be surprised. It’s confusing because they have definitely inspired a shift in certain things, I say. But ultimately look at what they’re rerouting things into. The radicalism and ultimately the sincerity and authenticity that has been the beating heart of the movement the last ten years seems to be absent, repressed, and called “cringe” as a manner of gatekeeping it and controlling it into a digestible, kosher transmutation. That’s why I ultimately reject it. It might appear to be successful as a tactic but on closer inspection you start to sense it’s a slow controlled cooption of the movement, removing its original vital essence and replacing it with gay Halloween Merch and Jewish Groypers telling you sonnenrads aren’t funny
counter-currents.com
