Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%

  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%

  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%

  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%

  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%

  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%

  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%

  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%

  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%
  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Allanon said:
Does it get tiring to constantly restructure your opinions about the judge based solely on whether his last action appears to have benefitted Kyle or not?
Click to expand...
I wouldn't know, I assumed that the judge would look good then bitch out at the 11th hour from the start.

Why? Because this exact song and dance happened during Weeb Wars, Chauvin, et cetera.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Pocket Dragoon, RurkerHivemind, Allanon and 1 other person
I believe the judge intends to overturn the verdict if hung or guilty. I also think he will cuck last minute if he has to. I'm still giving a slight edge to acquittal over hung jury. If we hear nothing by lunch, I:'m forced to assume it's all fucked and the jury is hung.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Spicey McHaggis, Pocket Dragoon and Don't @ Me
mikal said:
If we wanted to remind ourselves - this is what the jury was viewing and talking about for 45 mins.


Click to expand...
Well, in this instance looking at that video where he shoots that fellow, how you could not take that as self-defense? It would be a wild stretch to think otherwise, the guy wasn't coming up on Rittenhouse to shake his fucking hand.

I don't like Rittenhouse. I think he is a scumbag, but as a juror I would find it very very very hard to believe based on what I've seen that Rittenhouse did not have a good reason to believe his life was in danger.

If I was a juror I would hate the punk, but I'd find him...NOT guilty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yamma Damma, Allakazam223, MrJokerRager and 4 others
I admit I'm a filthy European and my understanding of US justice system is Law and Order and podcasts, but did people really expect a verdict that quick that they're scared of the jury taking a day?
I do think Kyle defended himself and he shouldn't even be tried for this, but he still killed two people and shot one more guy. If I was on the jury I'd still feel responsible towards the victim's families and want to go through the evidence, discuss everything with the other jurors and make sure I come to the correct conclusion.

It's not an easy decision, I'd have to walk out and tell someone I think his child deserved to die. I'd want to take my time to go through the evidence again to at least make sure I am making the right decision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yamma Damma, Allakazam223, SpergRush and 1 other person
Menotaur said:
Well, in this instance looking at that video where he shoots that fellow, how you could not take that as self-defense? It would be a wild stretch to think otherwise, the guy wasn't coming up on Rittenhouse to shake his fucking hand.

I don't like Rittenhouse. I think he is a scumbag, but as a juror I would find it very very very hard to believe based on what I've seen that Rittenhouse did not have a good reason to believe his life was in danger. Beyond his belief, I think

If I was a juror I would hate the punk, but I'd find him...NOT guilty.
Click to expand...
Not who I expected to say something like this.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pocket Dragoon and More AWS-8Q Than You
Estolysis said:
Nope. It ends when they all agree on a verdict, or agree to disagree and it's a hung jury.
Click to expand...
Ridiculous. Make majority jury rulings by 11-1 or 10-2 a thing after like a day of debate. If there are 1 or 2 faggots holding out on either a guilty or not guilty verdict and wasting time and energy, just bypass them. Why should it be hung/mistrial because one person refuses budge, thereby opening up another long, costly and lengthy retrial on a fairly simple case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back