- Joined
- Mar 24, 2019
A pedophile, a wife-beater, and... what was the third one?If I was on the jury I'd still feel responsible towards the victim's
Sure that's the word you want to use?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A pedophile, a wife-beater, and... what was the third one?If I was on the jury I'd still feel responsible towards the victim's
ThiefA pedophile, a wife-beater, and... what was the third one?
I actually sympathize with Rittenhouse, but same thing. I'd find him not guilty. But I have this weird thing where I literally no longer care if I live or die. So if I could go down shooting some antifags, I'd be fine with that. Some of these jurors have families.If I was a juror I would hate the punk, but I'd find him...NOT guilty.
Are all judges like this?Boomer Schroder reminds me of a principal cracking a joke after shitting on you for your behavior/grades. You just laugh to be polite and get on his good side.
/pol/ and their ilk really just want there to be things like OKC and Christchurch every day, don’t they?I believe this is the only legitimate take left on what is happening. Any accusation of incompetence is laughable at this point, everyone is visibly scared. https://t.me/spectrebackup/1130
No, always bias towards acquittal. The standard is "reasonable doubt". If one guy says no, there's reasonable doubt imoRidiculous. Make majority jury rulings by 11-1 or 10-2 a thing after like a day of debate. If there are 1 or 2 faggots holding out on either a guilty or not guilty verdict and wasting time and energy, just bypass them. Why should it be hung/mistrial because one person refuses budge, thereby opening up another long, costly and lengthy retrial on a fairly simple case.
That's not quite right. Whoever is in the majority now either wins or there's a hung jury.Yeah going into day 3 is danger territory, IMO.
Chances the not guilty people eventually cuck or a hung jury grows exponentially from here on. Especially with the Thanksgiving holiday right around the corner.
Touching Moment as Brave Activists and Sympathetic Police Embrace Outside Kenosha CourthouseThis bitch got picked up like Pedobaum
View attachment 2726461
well he's a yid so..fuck goodlawgic is exceptional.
That's not Kyle's fault, though. The issue is the only reason this trial exists is so the state of Wisconsin and the local county and police can absolve themselves of responsibility for the rioting. If they had done their jobs and maintained law and order, there would be no/minimal rioting and Kyle would not have been in this situation in the first place. Criminals like Rosenbaum and Jumpkick guy and Gross created the situation and were allowed to because the government didn't do their job. They want to throw Kyle in prison and blame the situation on him and shift attention away from their lack of leadership and action.I do think Kyle defended himself and he shouldn't even be tried for this, but he still killed two people and shot one more guy. If I was on the jury I'd still feel responsible towards the victim's families and want to go through the evidence, discuss everything with the other jurors and make sure I come to the correct conclusion.
As someone who follows the Weeb Wars saga, I feel it's worth clarifying that Chupp never did anything to look good. People simply assumed because he was Republican and set the court and deposition dates as early as possible that he was completely based and on Vic's side with zero actual investigation into him. I can't speak to how the judge behaved in the Chauvin case, but this judge has been much more openly sympathetic toward Kyle and his side of things than Chupp ever appeared to be toward Vic. Assuming Shroeder would Chupp would be a decision based off of cynicism, rather than experience.I wouldn't know, I assumed that the judge would look good then bitch out at the 11th hour from the start.
Why? Because this exact song and dance happened during Weeb Wars, Chauvin, et cetera.
I have a family and my attitude to threats is to properly inform the person making such a threat that their death would be a certainty once they try.I actually sympathize with Rittenhouse, but same thing. I'd find him not guilty. But I have this weird thing where I literally no longer care if I live or die. So if I could go down shooting some antifags, I'd be fine with that. Some of these jurors have families.
We can only hope the not-guilty votes are as stubborn as my ass would be in there. Which is hunker down and say, "I'm not sentencing this child to live the rest of his life as the walking dead in jail based on this blurry ass video, and your discomfort with guns. Either change YOUR vote, or prep for a hung jury as long as this rides out."Yeah going into day 3 is danger territory, IMO.
Chances the not guilty people eventually cuck or a hung jury grows exponentially from here on. Especially with the Thanksgiving holiday right around the corner.
There's always the chance that the holdouts are NG guys in a room full of guilty, but I'd guess full guilty is highly unlikely.Do you think we can safely rule out guilty at this point or at least insanely unlikely?
Cynicism and experience are often synonyms when it comes to the legal system.Assuming Shroeder would Chupp would be a decision based off of cynicism, rather than experience.
There's also a lot of shit developing while the jury deliberated. That shit with handbrake bucknbroke me.Jury deliberations are not designed for live threads following them. Go do something more productive with your time instead of popping pills over every little thing that happens.