Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

[Kermit Jizz]

I don't see what's so reasonable about spamming prison rape niggers pics

Hey, don't conflate us reputable doomers with lowly BBC lovers.

 

[Mr Bunny]

Most likely. Considering even most redditors lean not guilty, it would be odd for most of the jurors to lean guilty.

Unless they're Twitter users

 

[Rumpled Foreskin]

Taco Thursday, let’s go.

 

[RurkerHivemind]

Babi Yar the leftists and the niggers.

I would kill all the men and take in women and children as slaves. And undo a lot if not all the brainwashing done by academia.

More or less start a Farcry-escque cult.

 

[Puff]

Didn't the jury just spend a couple of hours in the Chauvin trial? The fact that this has taken two days even after the jury had the weekend to think things through means someone is being a stubborn motherfucker. Question is if they're our motherfuckers

To recap
The jury, if randomly picked, would be about 33% guilty, 33% swayable, 33% NG before the trial began.
-long sperg removed-
That leaves going into deliberations probably something like 8/2/2 NG/swing/guilty
It's likely a hung jury or NG is a majority and is going to slowly convert the last.
At least that's my best guess. There's a long winded post on it about a thousand pages ago.

 

[Post Reply]

Didn't the jury just spend a couple of hours in the Chauvin trial? The fact that this has taken two days even after the jury had the weekend to think things through means someone is being a stubborn motherfucker. Question is if they're our motherfuckers

The Zimmerman jury took 16 hours of deliberation to find him innocent, for reference.

 

[I-chi]

We're not doomposters, we're just the most reasonable.

Ventilate yourself, newfag.

 

[Only A Retard Sometimes]

Yeah. I mean for once I would love to see an American Civil War go all out with all sorts of war crimes and shit.

the first one was chock full of war crimes. prisoners used for land mine detection, mass executions, concentration camps, starvation, torture, theft, violations of the constitution, restriciton of the press, removal of the right to assemble etc.

 

[LUNEKO]

Hey, don't conflate us reputable doomers with lowly BBC lovers.

You'd think on a lolcow website people would understand the principle of "if you demand people stop, they will pushback harder".

KYLE GONNA TAKE THAT BBC IN THE BUSSY!

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

I’d be concerned with judges-the old boomer judges will eventually retire and you’ll have Laquisha Nigerrica who majored in Critical Race Whiteness Law deciding your fate.

With a jury you at least have some hope someone is sympathetic to you.

This.

I was gonna say some corrupt judge on the payroll of a cartel, like our brothers to the south have, but honestly this is more realistic.

 

[Matt Damon]

Unless they're Twitter users

12 Twitter users wouldn't fix in the jury box.

 

[Slimy Time]

My thought is that the holdouts are the Guilty ones, the rest of the jury have been trying various ways to convince them.

First with asking for only 1 to 6 of jury instructions, then the rest, then the videos of one armed bandit and finally back to the drone video.
Basically you have to get them to admit where they might be wrong and take the logical baby steps to the next points with them because of how fucking exceptional they are.

If it's the opposite with majority guilty then we are in for some very dark days ahead. That the prosecution can put forth such a shoddy case, filled with innumerable examples of prosecutorial misconduct and lacking in both the facts and law, as well as the numerous times the jury has been sent out for clear, intentional "errors" by the prosecution, and still be swayed, or perhaps put fear of "the mob" over what should be a fairly clear cut case of self defence (or at the least, an absolute failure of the prosecution to meet the burden required). If it is the latter, then people really are beyond hope.

 

[anti SJW]

you’ll have Laquisha Nigerrica who majored in Critical Race Whiteness Law deciding your fate.

There was a female divorce judge in my state that got removed and I think disbarred. No matter what, She'd always side with the female in the divorce, not giving the man anything at all.

The women could literary be smoking crack on a street corner with one hand, holding the kid with the other while sucking off some dude and the Judge would give Her everything She'd want in the divorce case.

 

[RurkerHivemind]

the first one was chock full of war crimes. prisoners used for land mine detection, mass executions, concentration camps, starvation, torture, theft, violations of the constitution, restriciton of the press, removal of the right to assemble etc.

Does it include rape and grooming?
Who am I kidding?
That shit is already normal.

 

[Pocket Dragoon]

I don't like Rittenhouse. I think he is a scumbag, but as a juror I would find it very very very hard to believe based on what I've seen that Rittenhouse did not have a good reason to believe his life was in danger.

If I was a juror I would hate the punk, but I'd find him...NOT guilty.

Thank you, this clears something up for me. I've always wondered with every one of your shit takes if it's bait, willfull ignorance, or if you're just stubbornly misguided; I can at least respect the last. But that you're not being willfully ignorant or baiting here on this, is a pretty good sign.

 

[Sage In All Fields]

 

[Allanon]

It's worth noting that the 'hold outs' may not be Karens, but may legitimately be intimidated jurors. It could be the intimidated jurors are waffling about the evidence being unconvincing on either side (even though with presumption of innocence this would make it pro-Kyle) and the rest of the jury thus going over the instructions and the evidence to try to show it is overwhelmingly on Kyle's side. As people have said, if the jurors admit outside influence they'll be removed, but if they're afraid of the left rioting and the right targeting them (because they believe the news, and so the right is a big scary boogeyman too) they wouldn't want to be singled out as 'jurors who had to be removed' and would instead make up excuses like 'I don't know, the evidence just isn't clear to me...'

I don't know what such a case would mean on the scale of 'hold outs eventually giving in to not-guilty' to 'cowardice sticking true until hung jury', but it might also explain part of why the jury won't just admit it's hung, either. A hung jury has all the consequences of a guilty and a not-guilty verdict at once, at least as far as a rabbit on the jury would be concerned.

 

[Only A Retard Sometimes]

If it's the opposite with majority guilty then we are in for some very dark days ahead. That the prosecution can put forth such a shoddy case, filled with innumerable examples of prosecutorial misconduct and lacking in both the facts and law, as well as the numerous times the jury has been sent out for clear, intentional "errors" by the prosecution, and still be swayed, or perhaps put fear of "the mob" over what should be a fairly clear cut case of self defence (or at the least, an absolute failure of the prosecution to meet the burden required). If it is the latter, then people really are beyond hope.

the jury does not know anything about the prosecutions violations. they have been out of the room for each one.

 

[Ishtar]

The ACW was actually pretty civilized. For the standards of the time and definitely of the 20th century. You had occasional massacres especially in the west, and of course Sherman’s March, but generally the armies sought to behave as gentlemen not savages. It was seen as unbecoming to rape and loot your way to victory.

A second American civil war would be far less restrained.

 

[Slimy Time]

Didn't the jury just spend a couple of hours in the Chauvin trial? The fact that this has taken two days even after the jury had the weekend to think things through means someone is being a stubborn motherfucker. Question is if they're our motherfuckers

4 hours for OJ Simpson.
12 hours for Trayvon Martin (a case which is more complex than this one by virtue of there being zero video footage).
10 hours for Chauvin.

the jury does not know anything about the prosecutions violations. they have been out of the room for each one.

I'm pretty sure they picked up on it when the judge snapped at Binger pre-emptively before kicking them out during one of his many fuckups. Unless they are complete smoothbrains (which seems to be the case with how long this is taking), they should be able to pick up on what is happening, even if they don't hear it.