Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
NYT writer made an article talking shit about Kyle for the usual "something-something-something WHITE SUPREMACY!!!1" bullshit.

Imagine what would happen if for even a single second an article like one of these appeared but white was replaced with black. As always, to these people racism's fine so long as it's against whites.
he blows alright.png
 
My kingdom for an autistic sticker.
I’m quite serious. Democracy won’t save us. We need an absolute monarch, a Caesar. Someone who has no limits and absolute authority over all.

Someone who is both incorruptible and unbreakable.

Someone who can make all things right.

Unfortunately no such man exists.
 
NYT writer made an article talking shit about Kyle for the usual "something-something-something WHITE SUPREMACY!!!1" bullshit.

Imagine what would happen if for even a single second an article like one of these appeared but white was replaced with black. As always, to these people racism's fine so long as it's against whites.
View attachment 2727042
"Race hangs heavy over cases featuring white male defendants accused of everything" this is accurate, yes. Because the media won't stop harping on it every time there's a white male defendant, no matter what they're accused of.
 
NYT writer made an article talking shit about Kyle for the usual "something-something-something WHITE SUPREMACY!!!1" bullshit.

Imagine what would happen if for even a single second an article like one of these appeared but white was replaced with black. As always, to these people racism's fine so long as it's against whites.
View attachment 2727042
>Black NYT writer. What do you expect?
 
I’m quite serious. Democracy won’t save us. We need an absolute monarch, a Caesar. Someone who has no limits and absolute authority over all.

Someone who is both incorruptible and unbreakable.

Someone who can make all things right.

Unfortunately no such man exists.
Augustus or Julius? Because Julius has a debate around if he actually wanted to kill Pompey. Augustus was a straight up tyrant who killed his enemies and realized when he sucked at something. Augustus also was simp to Livia.
 
I’m quite serious. Democracy won’t save us. We need an absolute monarch, a Caesar. Someone who has no limits and absolute authority over all.

Someone who is both incorruptible and unbreakable.

Someone who can make all things right.

Unfortunately no such man exists.
Go home Medic, you're as drunk as Demo.
 
Augustus or Julius? Because Julius has a debate around if he actually wanted to kill Pompey. Augustus was a straight up tyrant who killed his enemies and realized when he sucked at something. Augustus also was simp to Livia.
A combination of Augustus, moustache man, septimus Severus, Andrew Jackson, and Tamerlane.

Would be my ideal ruler.
 
Someone who is both incorruptible and unbreakable.
Good luck with that. Robespierre thought he was incorruptible and a savior to the French and look what happened to him. Caesar ended up stabbed because power grabs like his are unpopular with others that also want power. Bolivar pretty much became a dictator after liberating lots of South America from Spain, and he became more unpopular as time went on, eventually dying in exile. The only one incorruptible is Jesus.
 
Do Xi Xing Pei and Kim Jong Un seem like lefties to you? It's extremely common for a tyrant to co-opt some movement that gets them the support of the people to seize control, and then immediately abandon the ideals they pretended to espouse once they have it. The tyrannical wing of the government seems leftist now, but you can already see the cracks in their facade, as they funnel trillions not into the pockets of poor illegals and welfare moms but their own coffers and to bribing foreign governments. They pretend to be leftist because right now the leftists are the easiest to control and radicalize into what they want. Should they ever fully gain the control they want in the name of 'stopping those wrong think bad guys', they'll drop the facade completely. For immediate evidence of this, I point to how the conservatives had all the strength in the early 00s, and all the 'progressive, liberal' people these days insisted that 'marriage should be for a man and a woman only!'. When being conservative meant they could take away freedoms and torture people and get support, that's what they did. When W fell out of favor, they switched to appealing to the progressives so they could ban books and shoot citizens while looking like the good guys. As the conservatives dig in their heels to resist the authoritarianism, those elements push into liberalism and encourage political polarization all the more, but it's not because they actually believe in leftist ideals, it's because it's the side most likely to allow them to gain more power and strip more freedoms.

you can't give me puzzle pieces for text walls here. stickers cannot save you now.

Agreed, and this is a good time to repeat what I've said before dozens of times.

Those people you know who are coworkers, friends, or even family acting like TROO Believers? You better get that shit outta your head about feeling anything for them--especially any you know who have ever refused to look at video of Nick Sandman and this shitshow.
Because what @Allanon says here will ring true eventually.
These same people who are libeling and slandering Kyle now are showing you what they will do--if it is expedient for them.
When what @Allanon says ends up happening--and it will--these SAME people will want a sympathetic ear. These SAME people will want you, and everyone else to stand up for Freedumbs and muh Constipitution, and as for me... FUCK OFF, Fuck off some more, and KEEP FUCKING OFF.

I am not interested. I will not help. I will not listen. I will not give food, water, shelter, or friendly advice. These "people" are dead--because Christ knows they are now, and will continue to do so--as long as their virtue signalling gets them whatever asspatz and facebook likes.

This is necessary, and not a fucking game. Turn your back--EVEN when they say "Oh, wow, I was wrong!" They are remorseful that they got caught/lost--not that they actually see what was wrong with their deadly ideologies.

TURN

YOUR

BACK

Save yourself, your like-minded loved ones, and like minded friends. Everyone else can die in a fire. Turn your back. You cannot afford not to in the Year of Our Lord, Current.
 
Good luck with that. Robespierre thought he was incorruptible and a savior to the French and look what happened to him. Caesar ended up stabbed because power grabs like his are unpopular with others that also want power. Bolivar pretty much became a dictator after liberating lots of South America from Spain, and he became more unpopular as time went on, eventually dying in exile. The only one incorruptible is Jesus.
That’s more or less what we need. The Second Coming. A perfect ruler. Unfortunately there is no one amongst the entirety of the human race who can do this.

Someone who would be above you and me, as a shepherd is above the sheep. Not a man, a god incarnate.

Someone like this, would be worth following. Someone like this could be a savior.
 
That’s more or less what we need. The Second Coming. A perfect ruler. Unfortunately there is no one amongst the entirety of the human race who can do this.
In the meantime, try and marry a decent person and breed good people. Better people make a better nation. Make a nation of Kyles to outnumber the Rosenbaums.
 
None of that is actually leftism. Leftism is an ideal, a belief set. You're describing things done in the name of leftism to achieve authoritarianism, but those actions are not themselves inherently leftist.
No, I'm describing leftism. The perfectibility of man through governance is leftism, destroying or replacing traditions is leftism, replacing traditional families with communal or state child-rearing is leftism, etc. These things don't become not-leftism when the state becomes authoritarian or totalitarian. Those terms describe the role of the state in relation to the people and their institutions, not the philosophical underpinning of the state, the raison d'etre that gives it a mission, gives it legitimacy, and prevents widespread rebellion.

You cannot then say 'actually, it's entirely a leftist view to torture and indefinitely imprison Muslims' just because a communist government does it now.
I didn't do that. I said it's an entirely leftist view because the left's ideal vision of humanity is one where rationality has replaced religion and tradition, and it's the role of the state to bring this about. So that's what they try to do. The French revolution, the Soviets, the Maoists, and the American left are all on the same page here. Only the methods differ (for now).
 
Good luck with that. Robespierre thought he was incorruptible and a savior to the French and look what happened to him. Caesar ended up stabbed because power grabs like his are unpopular with others that also want power. Bolivar pretty much became a dictator after liberating lots of South America from Spain, and he became more unpopular as time went on, eventually dying in exile. The only one incorruptible is Jesus.
Caesar got stabbed because he didn't kill his enemies. His power grabs were something that Cicero watched happen after his death. I love Cicero for some of his commentaries, but the man was no Cato. Couldn't die for his ideals.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back