Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

[Constellationzero]

View attachment 2726915

He doubled down on this repeatedly and made multiple other errors about basic legal facts you could Wiki until he got distracted back to his normal ranting about the necessity of eliminating the inhuman garbage cluttering up America and enjoying Disney movies.

Never read on this Movie Blob guy, but here is a shining example of a democrat voter/leftist/progressive/feminist type you NEED to turn your collective backs on when the pendulum swings back.

It will swing back. And when it does...look out.

This faggot will blubber loudly like a bitch in full heat for a sympathetic ear. My hope is he, and others who think like him, are Acts 1 through eleventy in the McCarthy Anti-UnAmerican Activities Committee Courts Two: Electric Boogaloo and no soup from the breadlines for you.

 

[JoyfulDarter]

Imagine what would happen if for even a single second an article like one of these appeared but white was replaced with black. As always, to these people racism's fine so long as it's against whites.

Imagine if these motherfuckers weren't legally allowed to lie and slander people and get away with it.

 

[Calvin Coolidge]

A combination of Augustus, moustache man, septimus Severus, Andrew Jackson, and Tamerlane.

Would be my ideal ruler.

Don't leave out my boy Genghis Khan as you cobble together material for your admirable Serpentor 2.0.

 

[Allanon]

Good luck with that. Robespierre thought he was incorruptible and a savior to the French and look what happened to him. Caesar ended up stabbed because power grabs like his are unpopular with others that also want power. Bolivar pretty much became a dictator after liberating lots of South America from Spain, and he became more unpopular as time went on, eventually dying in exile. The only one incorruptible is Jesus.

As you said with Caesar, even when people try to rise up to be 'benevolent dictators', all that happens is that the less benevolent compatriots they used to seize power with will eventually turn on them and murder them, and everyone else is left with a dictator missing the 'benevolent' part.

 

[MrJokerRager]

Good luck with that. Robespierre thought he was incorruptible and a savior to the French and look what happened to him. Caesar ended up stabbed because power grabs like his are unpopular with others that also want power. Bolivar pretty much became a dictator after liberating lots of South America from Spain, and he became more unpopular as time went on, eventually dying in exile. The only one incorruptible is Jesus.

Probably Napoleon or Charlemagne or whoever was the first emperor of China that united everyone are the only ones that succeeded and ended the chaos.

Never read on this Movie Blob guy, but here is a shining example of a democrat voter/leftist/progressive/feminist type you NEED to turn your collective backs on when the pendulum swings back.

It will swing back. And when it does...look out.

This faggot will blubber loudly like a bitch in full heat for a sympathetic ear. My hope is he, and others who think like him, are Acts 1 through eleventy in the McCarthy Anti-UnAmerican Activities Committee Courts Two: Electric Boogaloo and no soup from the breadlines for you.

Movie Blob is just some nameless retard that nobody cares about.

Im am surprised over how doesn't a fake niggress like Joy Reid doesn't have a lolcow page, since she is the cheerleader for getting Kyle railroaded. Joy Reid is from a upper middle class family of African immigrants.

 

[Only A Retard Sometimes]

View attachment 2727073

https://twitter.com/FuarFearg/status/1461156993553600516

They cropped the video to remove the Fox News branding and whatnot.

These idiots might have committed a Brady violation because the very idea of Fox News existing caused them to have a mental fuck breakdown.

I love this timeline.

jesus christ. tucker called to testify when?

 

[JambledUpWords]

As you said with Caesar, even when people try to rise up to be 'benevolent dictators', all that happens is that the less benevolent compatriots they used to seize power with will eventually turn on them and murder them, and everyone else is left with a dictator missing the 'benevolent' part.

I’d even be hesitant to want a benevolent dictator because even if the initial person is decent, doesn’t mean their successors will be as good. Also, stuff like “for the greater good” has been used to justify some pretty terrible things.

 

[Spicey McHaggis]

I’m quite serious. Democracy won’t save us. We need an absolute monarch, a Caesar. Someone who has no limits and absolute authority over all.

Someone who is both incorruptible and unbreakable.

Someone who can make all things right.

Unfortunately no such man exists.

You might get lucky and find such a man. But what of their successor? Will they be as perfect and incorruptible? What about the one after them? You only need to look at what's happened to various dynasties throughout history to realize why its a bad idea. No matter how strong the original member of the dynasty is, it WILL degenerate into a series of poor, ineffectual leaders. And the mechanisms for getting rid of kings are infinitely more bloody and destructive than those for getting rid of elected officials. Personally I don't want to live in a society where living through multiple civil wars in one lifetime is a thing.

 

[Only A Retard Sometimes]

wait, didnt the state say today that they only learned of the Fox video today? yet the used it as evidence? how many constitutional violations can we rack up?

 

[LaxerBRO]

ADA Klaus enjoying a vacation after the Rittenhouse trial.

 

[JambledUpWords]

Probably Napoleon or Charlemagne or whoever was the first emperor of China that united everyone are the only ones that succeeded and ended the chaos.

Qi, the first emperor of China, used legalism as means of controlling people, but due to the nature of “punish even the slightest infraction the way you would punish someone for murder” made for a bloodbath in the courts. The first dynasty only lasted 14 years because of that. Sure, he united people through force, but he did not end chaos.

 

[Kane Lives]

You might get lucky and find such a man. But what of their successor? Will they be as perfect and incorruptible? What about the one after them? You only need to look at what's happened to various dynasties throughout history to realize why its a bad idea. No matter how strong the original member of the dynasty is, it WILL degenerate into a series of poor, ineffectual leaders. And the mechanisms for getting rid of kings are infinitely more bloody and destructive than those for getting rid of elected officials. Personally I don't want to live in a society where living through multiple civil wars in one lifetime is a thing.

You only need to look at the dynastic history of China to see how bloody the changing of guard can be. Hundreds of thousands of deaths were expected each time.

 

[Calvin Coolidge]

As you said with Caesar, even when people try to rise up to be 'benevolent dictators', all that happens is that the less benevolent compatriots they used to seize power with will eventually turn on them and murder them, and everyone else is left with a dictator missing the 'benevolent' part.

That's why rather than "dictator" or "president for life" we ought to favor a King. They are rarely assassinated. Emperors too, Rome excepted. Frederick the Great is one more recent example.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

As you said with Caesar, even when people try to rise up to be 'benevolent dictators', all that happens is that the less benevolent compatriots they used to seize power with will eventually turn on them and murder them, and everyone else is left with a dictator missing the 'benevolent' part.

You don't even need backstabbing.

Just when they die whether their replacement will be as good is very much a question.

History has shown us this time and again.

 

[Pocket Dragoon]

Steel and fire. Remorseless slaughter over every square inch of ground. Then and only then will the country be saved.

You were luminescent from the beginning, but lately you've been glowing hard.

And then there's the name: Shamash, which would be Shamash-shum-ukin, the Assyrian prince of Babylon that rebelled against his brother, the king of Assyria. It's a pretty obvious metaphor for the North vs. South, especially given the fact that Babylon (the South) lost.

You're either sloppy, or a fed. Try harder.

 

[JambledUpWords]

That's why rather than "dictator" or "president for life" we ought to favor a King. They are rarely assassinated. Emperors too, Rome excepted. Frederick the Great is one more recent example.

The problem I have with monarchies is that historically they have almost always hinged on having heirs, and due to wanting to keep power within the same family lines, it meant lots of inbreeding, at least with European royalty. Also, just because someone is born into royalty does not mean they are fit for the job. Plenty of decent kings bred terrible future kings.

 

[ShoFuKan]

I’d even be hesitant to want a benevolent dictator because even if the initial person is decent, doesn’t mean their successors will be as good. Also, stuff like “for the greater good” has been used to justify some pretty terrible things.

Singapore is actually a really interesting example of Benevolent Dictatorship. They have a high standard of living due to foreign investment but keep themselves strictly neutral, even going so far as to host summits between China and Taiwan. The ruling party subsidizes healthcaree but has a private medicare fund people pay into. People rent houses on 90 year leases that are really spacious.
But the thing that gets them through all of this is not being overbearing on the common citizen. People still vote in elections but it's more a referendum on how the government was doing that year. A strong centralized government like China backed by the financial power that you get with outside investment. Singapore is of course and exception to the usual rules of dictatorships, still it's an interesting one.

 

[Smity Werbenjagermanjensen]

View attachment 2727073

https://twitter.com/FuarFearg/status/1461156993553600516

They cropped the video to remove the Fox News branding and whatnot.

These idiots might have committed a Brady violation because the very idea of Fox News existing caused them to have a mental fuck breakdown.

I love this timeline.

So let me get this straight, these idiots managed to get ahold of a Foxnews broadcast, cropped it because they couldn't find the original and didn't want the Foxnews header (which is probably considered tampering with evidence unless they get the OK from the Judge), then they compressed it to almost 3 times as small when they sent it to the defense.
Man they really are Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum.
Edit: Also it explains the weird ass resolution on the HD footage.

 

[JambledUpWords]

Singapore is actually a really interesting example of Benevolent Dictatorship. They have a high standard of living due to foreign investment but keep themselves strictly neutral, even going so far as to host summits between China and Taiwan. The ruling party subsidizes healthcaree but has a private medicare fund people pay into. People rent houses on 90 year leases that are really spacious.
But the thing that gets them through all of this is not being overbearing on the common citizen. People still vote in elections but it's more a referendum on how the government was doing that year. A strong centralized government like China backed by the financial power that you get with outside investment. Singapore is of course and exception to the usual rules of dictatorships, still it's an interesting one.

Most dictatorships I’ve read about get rid of voting almost entirely except for people in the inner circle. That is pretty interesting, though, I don’t know how well it would translate into some place like the United States.

 

[Matt Damon]

View attachment 2727073

https://twitter.com/FuarFearg/status/1461156993553600516

They cropped the video to remove the Fox News branding and whatnot.

These idiots might have committed a Brady violation because the very idea of Fox News existing caused them to have a mental fuck breakdown.

I love this timeline.

Even if you were going to purposely send shitty footage to the defense to gain an advantage, why in the name of God would you do it in such a bizarre, needlessly convoluted way?

I'm flabbergasted.