Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’d even be hesitant to want a benevolent dictator because even if the initial person is decent, doesn’t mean their successors will be as good. Also, stuff like “for the greater good” has been used to justify some pretty terrible things.
For "the grea'er good" justifies plenty of terrible things in democracies. I submit the past 88 years of American history. It goes back further though, recall the Bank of the United States. Too I think a lifetime reign with a successor in the wings ends up with a more favorable result overall. What president hasn't been a sociopath? From Bush I on down. Before that Nixon.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: MrJokerRager
You were luminescent from the beginning, but lately you've been glowing hard.
View attachment 2727087
View attachment 2727057
And then there's the name: Shamash, which would be Shamash-shum-ukin, the Assyrian prince of Babylon that rebelled against his brother, the king of Assyria. It's a pretty obvious metaphor for the North vs. South, especially given the fact that Babylon (the South) lost.

You're either sloppy, or a fed. Try harder.
I don't know if this guy's a fed, but I find it pretty entertaining that he talks like he just walked out of a Metal Gear Solid game.
 
You were luminescent from the beginning, but lately you've been glowing hard.
View attachment 2727087
View attachment 2727057
And then there's the name: Shamash, which would be Shamash-shum-ukin, the Assyrian prince of Babylon that rebelled against his brother, the king of Assyria. It's a pretty obvious metaphor for the North vs. South, especially given the fact that Babylon (the South) lost.

You're either sloppy, or a fed. Try harder.
Shit I wish was I was a Fed. I'd be getting paid to post here. KF allows actual free speech, and everything I'm saying is true.

But if you want to think of me as a glowie, I won't be offended.
 
Even if you were going to purposely send shitty footage to the defense to gain an advantage, why in the name of God would you do it in such a bizarre, needlessly convoluted way?

I'm flabbergasted.
My understanding is Kraus and Binger are basically the Beavis and Butthead of the system. The DA kicked the case down to them because he knew it was a stinker. So, that could be it.
 
For "the grea'er good" justifies plenty of terrible things in democracies. I submit the past 88 years of American history. It goes back further though, recall the Bank of the United States. Too I think a lifetime reign with a successor in the wings ends up with a more favorable result overall. What president hasn't been a sociopath? From Bush I on down. Before that Nixon.
You’re right that it’s also used in other governments, but on principle, I don’t want any dictatorship because I don’t trust the government that much. Dictatorships just make the government even more powerful.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Da Silky Turban
You don't even need backstabbing.

Just when they die whether their replacement will be as good is very much a question.

History has shown us this time and again.
Oh this is pure nonsense, history has only produced a very small handful of Caligulas out of thousands of emperors, and even Caligula likely wasn't as bad as he is made out to be, but was merely slandered by his enemies in the senate (fake news has always existed). Emperors and other dictators typically have dozens of advisors and other powerful men within the state, who are often collectively more powerful than the leader himself. The big difference between an autocracy and a democracy is that an autocracy might have a bad government, but democracy is a bad government by design. It is set up so that it divides the population into an us-vs-them mentality, and forces politicians to peddle influence to campaign donors if they want to get anywhere. Then these influence-peddlers all cover for eachother like a den of vipers. If a minister or a governor were caught engaging in corrupt acts under an autocracy, he would be removed by the monarch, if not outright executed.
 
You’re right that it’s also used in other governments, but on principle, I don’t want any dictatorship because I don’t trust the government that much. Dictatorships just make the government even more powerful.
People don't understand that you can vote to give your guys a ton of power today and tomorrow the other side can then use that same power against you as soon as they're in power.
 
View attachment 2727073

FEcP4WMWUAIkBtu
FEcQcsRWUAAybQv
FEcSiUQXIAMh5XR


They cropped the video to remove the Fox News branding and whatnot.

These idiots might have committed a Brady violation because the very idea of Fox News existing caused them to have a mental fuck breakdown.

I love this timeline.
I... what? The prosecution's HD version doesn't have that banner, right? Did they alter the video TWICE??
 
Shit I wish was I was a Fed. I'd be getting paid to post here. KF allows actual free speech, and everything I'm saying is true.

But if you want to think of me as a glowie, I won't be offended.
Imagine getting paid to post on Kiwifarms...

I say as I shitpost on Kiwifarms while at work.
 
View attachment 2727073

FEcP4WMWUAIkBtu
FEcQcsRWUAAybQv
FEcSiUQXIAMh5XR


They cropped the video to remove the Fox News branding and whatnot.

These idiots might have committed a Brady violation because the very idea of Fox News existing caused them to have a mental fuck breakdown.

I love this timeline.
Nah, they did not use the FOX footage, at least not THAT fox footage. However it is now clear that the video that they have has the top 22% cut off. Likely the video had a watermark or something on the top that would have identified it, or something. Very odd. Either that or it was the Fox news copy of the video, but the direct version, not the one aired on TV.

Either way this was shady as shit. There is no chain of custody, we don't know who filmed it, or anything.
 
I don't know if this guy's a fed, but I find it pretty entertaining that he talks like he just walked out of a Metal Gear Solid game.
Obligatory:
My understanding is Kraus and Binger are basically the Beavis and Butthead of the system. The DA kicked the case down to them because he knew it was a stinker. So, that could be it.
Except I get the impression that these prosecutors are at least trying. Bravos and Butt-Head wouldn’t even do that.
 
People don't understand that you can vote to give your guys a ton of power today and tomorrow the other side can then use that same power against you as soon as they're in power.
I just want the government to stop overstepping their boundaries for the sake of “safety”. Though, people will willingly sacrifice their rights for safety, so I can’t bring myself to feel sorry for those that don’t realize that they aren’t getting those rights back unless it’s through force.
 
Nah, they did not use the FOX footage, at least not THAT fox footage. However it is now clear that the video that they have has the top 22% cut off. Likely the video had a watermark or something on the top that would have identified it, or something. Very odd. Either that or it was the Fox news copy of the video, but the direct version, not the one aired on TV.

Either way this was shady as shit. There is no chain of custody, we don't know who filmed it, or anything.
I've been insinuating the FBI/Three letter glowies gave it to them, do I have to spell it out?

THE GLOWIES GAVE IT TO THEM ON THE DOWN LOW
 
Maybe I'm just dumb here, but why would the glowies need to give it to them on the down low?

The feds and states share evidence like this all the time.
Because this is a state case and the Kenosha DA is probably not a party to that agreement

Because why aren't the other rioters prosecuted?

Because fuck us all, that's why
 
My understanding is Kraus and Binger are basically the Beavis and Butthead of the system. The DA kicked the case down to them because he knew it was a stinker. So, that could be it.

Binger And Kraushead.gif

"Uh, the state wishes to like, enter some evidence or something"

"Heh heh, yeah like, rosenbaum totally had the right to start that FIRE!, yeah, fire!"

"Eh-he, yeah fire is cool, huhuh"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back