11/18/2021 - Court case continued into the new year

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why can't they press incest charges on her if she was a willing participant?
i think it has to do with the dynamic of power in the situation

besides that they can independently determine that she was very much forced into doing it, and still not charge Chris with Rape because Barb requested they don't. Even if the state pressed rape charges, if they couldn't get barb to testify it would be a nightmare.
 
There are very few felony charges I can think of that would fit this case, one of them being rape.

Here's the fun thing about rape charges: Barb gets to decide whether they're pressed. When someone is raped or otherwise assaulted they get to call the shots on if charges are pressed or not. If Barb was incapacitated/deemed incompetent then the police/courts could press charges on her behalf, however, since she was sent home alone they clearly trust her decision making.

They can press incest charges because incest in and of itself is a crime. They can't press assault/rape charges if Barb insists that no rape/assault took place.

Right, which is why I think a rape charge is very, very unlikely, especially with the revelation that Barb is possibly writing to Chris in jail.

However the incest with mother charge *CAN* be a felony. It can be charged, at the discretion of the prosecution, as a Class 5 felony or a Class 1 misdemeanor. If Chris is arraigned on felony incest, it will have to go to circuit court. Since Chris is still in jail, he is definitely charged with something, as they can't keep you in jail without charges. Since the case is still in J&DR court, he hasn't been charged with any felonies yet. The instant it hits circuit court we know things have gotten worse for Chris.

Why can't they press incest charges on her if she was a willing participant?

They can, but they don't *have* to. Prosecutors are free to ignore crime as much as they want, up until they piss off the electorate such that they get voted out of office, or if they piss off the legislature enough that they get impeached, or at least have a special prosecutor assigned for the cases the regular prosecutor ignored.

The prosecutor here clearly thinks Chris is the more responsible party and doesn't want to waste time prosecuting an elderly woman.
 
Could literally just be her fumbling over the name but I would not be surprised if behind the scenes everyone at the court just calls him Chris Chan.
Yeah dude everyone "at the court" totally laughs behind his back and calls him Chris-Chan, they probably post on Kiwi Farms and make le epic Sonichu edits too!!!! You should call back and ask if there's a "Julay" scheduled for a hearing any time soon, she'd probably love the epic reference!!!!!
 
i think it has to do with the dynamic of power in the situation

besides that they can independently determine that she was very much forced into doing it, and still not charge Chris with Rape because Barb requested they don't. Even if the state pressed rape charges, if they couldn't get barb to testify it would be a nightmare.
Well, if her brain isn't mush and she did it deliberately, then she has no one to blame but herself if it happens again.

Willing or unwilling, it is a crime.
Eh, no, since unwilling intercourse is rape and it would be absolutely fucked up to charge victim for that.
 
Yeah dude everyone "at the court" totally laughs behind his back and calls him Chris-Chan, they probably post on Kiwi Farms and make le epic Sonichu edits too!!!! You should call back and ask if there's a "Julay" scheduled for a hearing any time soon, she'd probably love the epic reference!!!!!
You read way too much into harmless speculation brah. I said that it could have been her tripping over the name because that is 99% what it was. Merely mentioning the slight possibility that she stumbled because she is used to using a different name is not weenery.
 
Something tells me, they will let him back to 14 BC.
That would be a complete failure of the state, but it could happen simply because the system is too lazy, and it's not the first time the Chandlers win via their tard immunity. Understand that the state already allowed these two morons to have guardianship over eachother (at least for Chris over Barb) when they're not capable adults. Silver lining is no one gives a shit about Barb or Chris, so them only hurting eachother isn't something most people will lose sleep over.
 
Don't give him ideas! If Chris was forced out onto the streets he'd just be closer to a messianic archetype.

I don't think a Street Preacher Saga will happen as Chris is too meek to do such things consistently, but who knows, he might wind up doing it if he's actually homeless. If the system does its job and gets him into social services and housing post-release, then he'll probably stay indoors playing with toys as per usual.
another continuance, another "trial", then another continuance

This is 100% normal. And a hearing is not a trial. There will be no trial. Hearings are hearings.

For example, look at the number of continuances on a previous Chris case (the Gamestop pepper spray assault):
10/15/2015 09:30 AM FINAL
07/23/2015 09:30 AM CONTINUED
06/11/2015 09:30 AM CONTINUED PRELIMINARY
05/07/2015 10:30 AM CONTINUED
04/02/2015 09:30 AM CONTINUED
02/05/2015 09:30 AM CONTINUED
12/29/2014 09:00 AM CONTINUED
 
I told you guys. Next year, Chris will skate harder than a gay man in pink roller skates and daisy dukes. It will be a great year for Chris next year. He'll probably resume the Barb rape. We'll know deep down inside that a Jew made this all possible. Just like they're teaming up with Catholoc charities to send indigenous children who cross the border alone to pedophile rings.


1637258838236.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back