- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
>Are trannies the new jews. can we make an ethnostate
My final solution for the troon problem is to deport them all to Antarctica. They can make their utopia there.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
>Are trannies the new jews. can we make an ethnostate
Journalists are the biggest fags.Sorry for the double post, this just came up.
Michael Hobbes, a British journalist, has discovered that Chapelle lied about Daphne. Societal transphobia killed Chapelle's friend, not fellow trans harassment.
Link. It appears he does not allow ANY comments on his journalism whatsoever. Contrast this with Alex Berenson or Glenn Greenwald, whose comment sections are filled with reader input.
He also lacks predictive power. These predictions came true.
View attachment 2727574
View attachment 2727575
He was on a Podcast, 'You're wrong about' that has 121k listeners yet cannot pull in more than 150 likes per post. Twitter.
So if you see BreadTube/troon Twitter talk about Chapelle, this is what they are referring to.
Here is his post on CRT/race panic. Comments closed again.
Some Jack Saint stuff, will post the rest in the BreadTube thread.
View attachment 2727571
Is that what they called it back thenAnd Rowling was signaling hard with Dumbledore - older man, never married, no children despite being good with children, flamboyant clothing and personality, and an extremely close "friendship" with another man who's also a confirmed bachelor.
I mean at that point you can’t get it up without a Cialis, how much worse could a neovag be?Imagine going from Chad grandpa to whatever the fuck this is.
View attachment 2728783
Imagine cutting your dick off at 73 years old. I have to believe he was hopelessly impotent.
Gotta love how half of them are just dyslexic spellings of sir and ma'am that sound like if someone with a speech impediment were to use sir or ma'am.enby wiki Of course they have a wiki article and a long list on this exact topic.
View attachment 2727693
The star is on point!
View attachment 2727697
So this wasn't woke pandering, "woke" was in its infancy in 2007.
To put it into perspective, California of all places banned gay marriage a year later.
Section 28 was a UK law that essentially forbade the positive portrayal of gay characters in children's media.
Dude was built for his age too. Why give that up?Imagine going from Chad grandpa to whatever the fuck this is.
View attachment 2728783
Imagine cutting your dick off at 73 years old. I have to believe he was hopelessly impotent.
In other words: it was a law that determined what kind of literature was allowed in public school libraries (aka within local government's jurisdictions). The entire publishing industry of UK children's literature was built around avoiding invoking this law, much like current Hollywood blockbusters avoid introducing major gay characters because that would mean that their movies would never be cleared for release to the Chinese market. There's a reason capeshit will pander to race (Black Panther) and feminism (Captain Marvel) but there's no such gay main character, despite there being plenty within the comic book source material. That's also the reason the Harry Potter "Fantastic Beasts" prequels don't dare show Dumbledore's gay relationship with Grindelwald, despite Rowling having established that they were gay lovers for over a decade now. It'd cost them the non-Western market.No. It was a law that stopped local government from promoting homosexuality to children. Nothing to do with the media at all.
Perfect trollface IRL.
Now that you misspelled it that way I am going to call him Grindrwald from now on.On Dumbledore being gay:
Don't forget that he was always dressed in extra over the top robes. Stars, shiny fabric, brilliant colors, just flamboyant in a way that other wizards didn’t seem to be. Even accounting for the horrid colors they sometimes dressed in. I think she was trying to give us hints in how he was dressed. But remember that we see Dumbledore only through Harry's viewpoint. What 11-17 year old thinks of their teachers as being adults with a personal and sexual life? It makes sense that he would never connect the dots. And thus we wouldn't know. The way she described his relationship with Grindwald was definitely somewhat sexual, I admit thinking when I read it that it sounded kinda gay, so when she said he was it made sense to me.
/autism
It is, but the reason you can see it is because the trans flag emoji,Just noticed that the tranny symbol in the front page feature isn't an in line image but rather the autistic troons in tech have made it into a unicode symbol. it's been there since 2005/Unicode 4.1 ️ God help us all. Also I've just noticed that the top left arrow is for "man who had his dick cut off." hence the slash through the arrow.
View attachment 2728321
I hate to disagree with this excellent post but Section 28 only applied to local authorities, forbidding them from promoting homosexuality to children or the "acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship". As this was never clearly defined the response was for local authorities to just refuse to talk about homosexuality to children, which obviously included all state schools.I can't believe I'm discussing Dumbledore being gay in Current Year, but fuck it. I think one thing about this "retcon" in particular is that it gets unfairly lumped in with all the other stupid additions Rowling made to HP canon over the years, but this is actually just as much of a revision of history as troons now trying to rewrite her past as sexist/racist/etc in light of her transphobia. The Dumbledore-being-gay revelation is not part of Rowling's woke twitter retcons, it just got lumped into them in retrospect. This particular tidbit got added to canon in 2007, only 3 months after the last book was released and before the last few movies were. It absolutely was part of canon - it's normal for authors to have detailed backstories about certain characters that never make it into the books, and the Dumbledore revelation was part of a larger set of background details about various characters that she talked about at fan conventions in an effort to promote the 7th book. So this wasn't woke pandering, "woke" was in its infancy in 2007. To put it into perspective, California of all places banned gay marriage a year later. It was just a very different cultural time.
Another thing to keep in mind is Section 28. Section 28 was a UK law that essentially forbade the positive portrayal of gay characters in children's media. This law was only repealed in 2003 - and Harry Potter started being published 1997. That's right, when Rowling started writing the series, her publisher would not have allowed her to make Dumbledore openly gay. Which isn't to say people didn't write gay characters under section 28. They did, and they used some recognizable tropes to signal a character's homosexuality in the subtext. And Rowling was signaling hard with Dumbledore - older man, never married, no children despite being good with children, flamboyant clothing and personality, and an extremely close "friendship" with another man who's also a confirmed bachelor.
WTF? He was in excellent shape for a 73 year old guy. Could have easily passed for 15 years younger.Imagine going from Chad grandpa to whatever the fuck this is.
![]()
In other words: it was a law that determined what kind of literature was allowed in public school libraries (aka within local government's jurisdictions). The entire publishing industry of UK children's literature was built around avoiding invoking this law,
That's also the reason the Harry Potter "Fantastic Beasts" prequels don't dare show Dumbledore's gay relationship with Grindelwald
>they want us all to be clockableYet another reminder that there's no point in trying to appease the troons:
View attachment 2728893
/lgbt/ - >even the youngshit tranny is depicted as a twinkh - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, & Transgender - 4chan
>even the youngshit tranny is depicted as a twinkhon with a long midface Every fucking time. Cisoids... - "/lgbt/ - LGBT" is 4chan's imageboard for Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender-Queer and sexuality discussion.boards.4channel.org
So fucking obvious you could see it from the moon was also OK in childrens entertainment, as long as it wasn't explicitly stated.Now that you misspelled it that way I am going to call him Grindrwald from now on.
Anyway I agree, and we also have to take into account that while homosexuality and gender non-conformity was taboo in both Britain and the US until recently, neutral non-obvious depictions were not completely absent from children’s entertainment in Britain the way they were in the US. Having a somewhat obvious but not explicitly gay teacher that you clarify is gay later just doesn’t strike me as weird given that wider cultural context, but might sound more pandering to Americans. Any Britbongs feel free to step in and correct me if I’m wrong.
Holy shit the second to last one.So fucking obvious you could see it from the moon was also OK in childrens entertainment, as long as it wasn't explicitly stated.
Evidence: This show started in 1972. Let's meet Bungle.
![]()
Top Ten: Bungle Moments
The Most Funniest and most Clumsiest Clips Of Bungle Counting down from 10www.youtube.com
Edit to add: To be fair, Brit children's TV has always been fucking weird. The Wombles taught gentle ecoterrorism, Bagpuss was Marxism for toddlers, and the only message any kids ever got from The Magic Roundabout was "Drugs are totally fucking awesome."
The cold temperature will keep their necrotic surgery results nice and freshMy final solution for the troon problem is to deport them all to Antarctica. They can make their utopia there.
Sorry, you're referencing gay characters off of Rainbow and you went for Bungle over George? George the hippopotamus? George the pink effeminate hippopotamus who had giant eyelashes. spoke with a lisp, was a giant softie and definitely had a thing for Zippy?So fucking obvious you could see it from the moon was also OK in childrens entertainment, as long as it wasn't explicitly stated.
Evidence: This show started in 1972. Let's meet Bungle.
![]()
Top Ten: Bungle Moments
The Most Funniest and most Clumsiest Clips Of Bungle Counting down from 10www.youtube.com
Edit to add: To be fair, Brit children's TV has always been fucking weird. The Wombles taught gentle ecoterrorism, Bagpuss was Marxism for toddlers, and the only message any kids ever got from The Magic Roundabout was "Drugs are totally fucking awesome."