Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
By Allah, this young mujahedin would have been awarded ten goats, 3 wives and a scimitar were I come from. He sent two dogs to sheitan, mashallah. Weak pigdog infidel society should just stone Karen and be done with it. Be careful, she fucked her dog and those are very dirty animals and should not be touched by humans.
An interesting fact about Sharia Law courts, they are usually decided by the judges themselves and make superfast decisions.

Kyle could have been free under Sharia Law.
 
Wisconsin represents a purple state where it cannot progress at all.

If Kyle was tried in California, he would fry on the chair.

If Kyle was tried in Florida, he would be given a medal by Governor DeSantis.

A wishy washy old bygone state like Wisconsin filled with Swedecucks is definitely hell.
If Kyle were in Florida or most of Texas it would have never even made it to trial. The cops would have told him to aim better next time and let him go on his way. Austin he'd probably fry.
 
We need common sense religion control. We didn't have all these kikes when the constitution was written.
We need common sense news media control. The first amendment isn't absolute. The corporate news media didn't exist when it was written.
Turns out freedom of religion simply meant the freedom of localities to make their own laws on religion as they saw fit, free from federal dictates, but try to convince a redditor of that and it won't be long before they switch to the now codified "well that's a good thing" line of thinking in regards to how we've mutilated the original intent of the document.
 
Last edited:
Let's hope it's a single guilty holdout and she slips in her kitchen tomorrow morning with very unfortunate consequences.
I think the most likely scenario where (the hypothetical) she is removed as a juror, would be a similar situation to the rejected juror a few days ago, where someone she knows snitches on her admitting to outside bias.

If this hypothetical Karen is the type of character we're imagining, and she's not a complete sociopath, she probably couldn't help herself but brag about what she's doing to the jury, how shes saving our democracy, and so on, to like-minded people around her.
 
Telling cunts to fuck off should be a lesson every parent gives to their kids. Would save us all some trouble.
its the feeling of guilt and doubt that wrecks people in group situations. and you can't train for it outside of experience.

look, you tell that lady to fuck off. then what? youve got 8 hours left and 10 other people, strangers, watched you tell this lady to fuck off. and now its the 3rd day. those 10 others will react to that. that lady's a cunt but youve possibly made her more likeable.

ive seen this play out all kinds of ways for discussion that thing that were set in stone 60-70 years ago. it happens. all it takes is guilt to make you second guess yourself and its hard if just one or two other people waver.
 
I think the most likely scenario where (the hypothetical) she is removed as a juror, would be a similar situation to the rejected juror a few days ago, where someone she knows snitches on her admitting to outside bias.

If this hypothetical Karen is the type of character we're imagining, and she's not a complete sociopath, she probably couldn't help herself but brag about what she's doing to the jury, how shes saving our democracy, and so on, to like-minded people around her.
If hypothetical Karen is doing it for ideological reasons, then it's highly probable that she's bragging about it to someone, because these people are addicted to asspats.
 
If Kyle were in Florida or most of Texas it would have never even made it to trial. The cops would have told him to aim better next time and let him go on his way. Austin he'd probably fry.
That's what's happening to Daniel Perry right now. Cops investigated, said he did nothing wrong and passed it to the DA who said the same thing. Then Austin elected a Soros DA who made going after him a priority and he's absolutely fucked now.
 
This Karen is going to do her own research of the law of self-defense tonight. Everybody knows that. That's grounds for a new trial if one of the other jurors squeals.

When Richards mentioned "a dictionary problem," he's talking about what happened in Manke v. Physicians Ins. Col of Wis., where a juror brought in a photocopy of a dictionary definition from home.

Google Scholar link: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_...&q=289+Wis.+2d+750&hl=en&as_sdt=4,50&as_vis=1
 
How autistic will the rabbit hole go gentlemen?

Theoretically to get her thrown off the jury, all you would have to do is figure out the correct name, contact the court/judge anonymously like with a burner phone and claim she talked to someone about it.
 
An interesting fact about Sharia Law courts, they are usually decided by the judges themselves and make superfast decisions.

Kyle could have been free under Sharia Law.
FEUwhTxXwAEg_oU.jpeg
 
its the feeling of guilt and doubt that wrecks people in group situations. and you can't train for it outside of experience.

look, you tell that lady to fuck off. then what? youve got 8 hours left and 10 other people, strangers, watched you tell this lady to fuck off. and now its the 3rd day. those 10 others will react to that. that lady's a cunt but youve possibly made her more likeable.

ive seen this play out all kinds of ways for discussion that thing that were set in stone 60-70 years ago. it happens. all it takes is guilt to make you second guess yourself and its hard if just one or two other people waver.
Oh yeah doing this has screwed me over a couple times irl. But if we all did it, life would improve.
 
(I don't watch the jewtube law grifters.)
I think the assumption that most are NG and the holdouts are G are due to the videos the jury wanted to watch.

Wanting to watch the drone footage and see the still of Kyle supposedly aiming the rifle is something that I would do if I were trying to convince someone he did those things. You watch the video and look at the image, say he's aiming, and plant the idea. Like how Kraus did to the judge, though he still didn't see it in the end lol. They may also be looking for the car mirror (hand in the still) in the video to (dis)prove it. There was that meme image of the blurry still on the left and drawings on the right, and honestly I could visualize the drawings in the blurry image.

And bringing home the instructions after three 7 hour days with them means they're going to pour over them and try to sway people, especially if it has the notes. Use the notes to google points to dissuade.
G would always try to get exhibits to convince the NGs whether they were 11 or 1. How does this indicate the number?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back