Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Got this from a local AZ news website


I remember Binger wanted prove what a terrible lying liar face Kyle was by claiming that Kyle didn't go to ASU and Richards shouted "you can pull up his student page".
---
Whatever. I'm so burnt out on this fucking trial, actually just the past 4 days.
I watched a Viva Frei video about the note from the juror. I had seen the tweet that pointed out that she used the same language as the prosecution when referring to the fire extinguisher. But in the video he pointed something else out that I didn't realize and pretty much confirms that the foreman, juror 54 is a huge cunt.

She starts off the note with 'Please prepare (video of pedo)' Not, 'Could you please' or 'Can we please have'. And ends the note with 'We will request when ready' This bitch obviously thinks very highly of herself and is drunk on power. I think during juror selection she just said what she thought everyone wanted to hear with every intention of going rogue. You can nominate yourself to be foreman, right? Yeah, she took that title quickly.

For a female, her handwriting is atrocious. She probably doesn't write actual words on paper very often - if at all. Looking at that note I see GED with no further education.
To be fair, very few people actually write stuff down on paper all that often anymore, so I'm not sure if I'd read too deeply into that.

The language used is a bit more interesting to me. Could just be someone who doesn't generally ask politely in general, or it could be that power trip.
 
I want to remind you that who you have to really hate here is Kyle's lawyers. They had 2 days of brainstorm to saw that a white blob of pixels is not Kyle's support hand and point it out on the closing statement to the jurors.
They did. They did exactly that. Richards had them get the gun back out for him and everything. That was when Lunchbox tried to shift to the Everyone Takes A Beating Sometimes messaging.
 
*All that shit*

HE CROSSED STATE LINES!

Obviously feels empathy with our boy Grosskreutz - he's even rocking the same holes in his ears. I wonder on who he was planning on stabbing and getting away by hiding behind women? So much hate so little time.

It's the Muppet Show in meat space.
Holy Christ in the cross I'm Fucking TIRED of the "STATE LINES!!!!!1!" These people keep screeching over and over, It's so fucking tiresome, I'm sure like 60% of the Rioters and looters there probably crossed, too.
Seriously, so fucking stupid
 
To be fair, very few people actually write stuff down on paper all that often anymore, so I'm not sure if I'd read too deeply into that.

The language used is a bit more interesting to me. Could just be someone who doesn't generally ask politely in general, or it could be that power trip.
Yeah I think people are reading too much into that. I think I sometimes write the same way when I'm writing a formal email. The fire extinguisher part is kind of worrying, though.
 
But in the video he pointed something else out that I didn't realize and pretty much confirms that the foreman, juror 54 is a huge cunt.

She starts off the note with 'Please prepare (video of pedo)' Not, 'Could you please' or 'Can we please have'. And ends the note with 'We will request when ready' This bitch obviously thinks very highly of herself and is drunk on power.
This is where these super speculative videos start to fall apart and cause problems. To me, this sounds like how people with clerical jobs are taught to write. "Please note", "Please be advised", etc. This person may have clerical experience or could be mirroring the wording of some material that has been given to them by the court. Personally, if I were in this situation I would be writing as clear and concise as possible for clarity. It might sound rude depending on interpretation, but the exact request is inarguably clear.
Worth noting that I'm only motivated to add my opinion here because we have seen handwriting analysis from Nick Rickets and all kinds of other baseless speculation from polititwits today and it's all building on a narrative that may not even be true given that the jurors are anonymous.
 
Yeah I think people are reading too much into that. I think I sometimes write the same way when I'm writing a formal email. The fire extinguisher part is kind of worrying, though.
Honestly I think to much is being made of the fire extinguisher wording. I doubt they remember the exact wording themselves, or it could just be they took notes on it when the prosecution was talking about it, and didn't feel the need to write it down again when the defense went over it again. It's a really minor autistic detail that has a great many possible explanations, most of them pretty benign. We're also speculating off of sketchy into, with very few hard facts. I doubt we'll ever know completely unless a few of the jurors do interviews and it gets brought up.
 
Untitled.png
 

The corrupt liberal media came for me, just like they came for Kyle Rittenhouse, and if he decides to sue I say go for it and hold the media accountable: NICHOLAS SANDMANN​


 
It's really not. I obviously know I'm talking about modern times in this, but if I were to send a squad of infantry to your house right now to raid your kitchen would they find a day's worth of supplies at least?
Sure, but what about tomorrow? If you're not running a baggage train, then you're going to have to leave or destroy most of your potential spoils when you move on. Without the ability to supply yourself without daily raiding, you're going to have to move directly from one populated area to another, at which point you're not waging an asymmetric war, you're roleplaying as General Sherman. It's going to be exceptionally easy to track and predict your movements, and God help you the moment they start burning their own crops ahead of you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6thRanger
We only have his word that was actually a lawyer for starters. But given that the jury instructions wouldn't be considered an outside source, it might not really be a rule violation, at least in my layman's view.
If they had notes on them, it would be. And wouldn't a subpoena of all of Juror 54's electronic devices be fascinating?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back