Courtesy of
@zachs fair , we have the notes
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/kyle-rittenhouse-legal-proceedings.103034/post-10502555
Now, basic thing for any evidence, the more interpretations and further apart said interpretations are, the less reliable something is. So if I can get two separate interpretations of a piece of evidence with diametrically opposed readings... its useless by itself. So, can we do that with this? Yes!
Starting on the first note: "Can we have..." this indicates passiveness, a desire to please. It's also worded politely, not as a demand but as a request. The lack of punctuation would indicate hesitancy, insecurity of how to phrase something,
Second note: Already had one request, now for the others. Still no punctuation but more forceful. The writer feels they are more used to their role, they have grown into it.
Third note: Two writes, but the main one remains consistent. Continues to be questions, finally has punctuation showing an increased familiarity with the role but questions continue to be polite, and even supremely differential with caring about what the judge needs to know. This shows a lack of self-centeredness.
Fourth note: Second one is still questioning, no demands, no imperiousness. First is a clear issue, but notably, it is the clearest example of grammatical incorrectness. This shows a lack of college education as the writing level is around middle-high school. We can deduce the writer has not been to college.
Fifth note: "Please prepare" Pleading, quiet, gentle. They want it but want to make sure that its clearly a request not a demand. This person is overly polite, if anything. it even makes sure the judge knows he will be forwarned to avoid imposition.
From this, I conclude this person is most likely a mid-western mother, likely married, and who has never been to college. She probably has a working-class background given the strong deference to authority and therefore is likely a gun owner.
The most ideal group for Rittenhouse.
And just like that the idea this proves it's a Karen just dies. We now have two equally legitimate conclusions from it, with diametrically opposed conclusions. This is why handwriting analysis is bullshit.