- Joined
- May 7, 2021
I rolled a d20 and got a 7, sorry guys nothing today.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think Richards values the cash he will make from another trial over his relationship with the judgeRichards is an idiot and a clown. Just likr Schroeder he doesnt seem to know how the modern world works and he clearly is valuing keeping his relationship with Schroeder good over defending Kyle (unless he really is this mega incompotent)
But remember he had jury consultant lady who does this kind of shit for a living who might be reading the room for him and is telling him this.
While she is also a dumb boomer who didnt seem to understand to avoud landmines she also seemed to have gotten at least a few people fighting for Kyle. If she can help cause a any form of mistrial Kyle got his moneys worth with her.
That's a darn shame. You know I had similar health problems back in the day. My local apothecary was able to brew something up good that can fix it. I could probably get some for a fair sum of goat's milk and have it delivered to the courthouse if it would help get a verdict by the end of the day.A good analysis, but thwarted by the fact that she capitalizes the letter K and draws the tail of some of her letters below the line, indicating her blood is full of yellow and perhaps black humourous bile.
The judge himself said he liked the idea of the juror doing outside researchIf Richards is paying attention, he'll demand her copy of the instructions be replaced with a fresh blank one when she arrives -- bye bye any notes she took overnight. And if I was in the jury and deadlocked because of a Karenzilla pulling this shit, the second she made any mention of outside research I'd be raising hell until the Ballif assigned to tard-wrangle them in deliberation knew, who would be required to take that info to the judge even if the Jury Foreman wasn't asking.
Judge might OD on optimism. I understand treating the jury as intelligent to a point. But trusting them to do outside research that isn't Reddit or news articles about this specific case?The judge himself said he liked the idea of the juror doing outside research
That's a darn shame. You know I had similar health problems back in the day. My local apothecary was able to brew something up good that can fix it. I could probably get some for a fair sum of goat's milk and have it delivered to the courthouse if it would help get a verdict by the end of the day.
We don't know this.You know people like to shit on Barnes a lot here, but it seems like he was right about the defense fucking up the jury selection. They screwed up and accidentally got a fucking activist or a twitter addict in the jury.
Drew the 7th card in a tarot deck. Got the Wheel. The verdict is a hung jury Judge Boomer declares a mistrial with prejudice.I rolled a d20 and got a 7, sorry guys nothing today.
View attachment 2730689
This thread is a hot mess so pardon if this has been discussed before--saw in Poso's feed last night that Richards thinks its a 6-6 split? And it's based on him seeing the jury before they left?
I was of the mind when I read 54's note that it leaned toward demanding/Karenesque, but I think that's due to where I live and that requests are often made here with a little sugar on top.
That is what a Newsmax reporter thinks what Richards thinks.I think Richards is reading a little too much into the expressions of jurors after 3 days of deliberations. If any -don't- look some level of grim I'd be surprised.
How else would you explain this shit going on for 4 days now? This is probably the most well documented self-defense case ever, everything was caught on video. The Zimmerman jury deliberation only lasted 16 hours, and they had no video evidence.We don't know this.
Richards is gonna have trouble getting clients if he loses. Both the left and right are gonna dump on him at that point. And the payout he is likely to get for this isnt gonna be fuck you money. He has to give Agent 47 his cut too. And thats assuming Kyles sketchy legal defense dude lets him have another go at it. He wont have a very successful round of secondary fundraising if people thinks its still RichardsI think Richards values the cash he will make from another trial over his relationship with the judge
I guess she saw that photoshopped picture of Huber and realized he really was a loser.Saw this very cool article this morning about Huber's girlfriend. I'm convinced she's not even really a person.
November 19, 2021
From George Zimmerman to Kyle Rittenhouse: A Decade of Woke Misrule
By Jack Cashill
Ten years ago this coming February, George Zimmermann shot and killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin on a rainy night in Sanford, Florida. Without intending, Zimmerman triggered a dark new phase in the history of progressive America.
Beginning with the Sacco and Vanzetti case in the 1920s, the left lied to conceal the guilt of the guilty. Yes, Virginia, those two bad boys were guilty. Upton Sinclair, who “proved” their innocence in his epic novel Boston, knew they were guilty. "My wife is absolutely certain that if I tell what I believe,” Sinclair confided to a friend, “I will be called a traitor to the movement and may not live to finish the book."
Unlike Sinclair, most of the “useful idiots” on the left did not need to be threatened to stay in line. For the next century, their self-righteousness led them to weep for a pantheon of martyrs from the Rosenbergs to Leonard Peltier to Mumia Abu-Jamal to Kenosha’s own Jacob Blake, all of them purported victims of American injustice.
With the dawn of the social media era, however, the newly minted “progressives” made a conscious turn to the sinister. No longer content to conceal the guilt of the guilty, they lied now to conceal the innocence of the innocent. As Zimmerman and Kyle Rittenhouse learned the hard way, Atticus Finch is dead. The woke have thrown in with the jailhouse mob. Mockingbirds beware.
With a few exceptions, however, technology has betrayed its leftist creators. Rittenhouse would have had no chance for justice were it not for the ubiquitous cell phone cameras. Had video captured the shooting of Martin, Zimmerman would not have been arrested.
Three days after Martin’s death, lead Sanford PD investigator Chris Serino called Zimmerman in for an additional interview. Bluffing, as police are allowed to do, he said to Zimmerman, “There’s a possibility that whatever happened between you and him is caught on videotape.” The gambit did not work. Said Zimmerman simply, “I prayed to God that someone videotaped it.”
Serino was testing Zimmerman. By this time he knew what happened. There was overwhelming eyewitness and audio evidence that Martin, an aspiring street fighter a half-foot taller than Zimmerman, gratuitously attacked the neighborhood watch captain. Here is what eyewitness Jonathan Good told Serino the night of the shooting:
We're speculating on rumours and insinuation from third parties who have no way to know what's actually going on. All we know for sure is that at least one juror is being obstinate about ruling. That's it. Anything beyond that is entirely imaginary and is only given credence through repetition. This thread has turned into some sort of ersatz twitter clone, with a bunch of unthinking rətards repeating the same rumours back to one another and acting like it's god's given truth.How else would you explain this shit going on for 4 days now? This is probably the most well documented self-defense case ever, everything was caught on video. The Zimmerman jury deliberation only lasted 16 hours, and they had no video evidence.
Worth noting that the 6-6 thing is also what a reporter thinks he overheardI think Richards is reading a little too much into the expressions of jurors after 3 days of deliberations. If any -don't- look some level of grim I'd be surprised.
I know its just hopium on my side but I hope sanity prevails.There is no way there isnt a hyper partisan on 1 side of the issue. There may be 1 for each side or multiple on each side. Who that person is, how many on each side, and which side is unknown. With 12 people it seems very likely to get 1 partisan from each side.
But its gone past the point of good faith discussion for these people and someone seems to be engaged in a battle of wills. They wouldnt have asked to go home early to do homework and go back at it otherwise.