Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
The only example that I could think of is how someone would spell color/colour. British write it colour and Americans write it color and even that's a throw in the dark.
Yeah but that's spelling, not handwriting. I mean you could probably also figure out if they're a jogger by their spelling--but not necessarily by their handwriting.
 
Yeah, these guys think 54 is certainly the foreman for some reason too. The rumors being presented as fact thing is getting out of hand.
We know Juror #54 is a woman from jury selection, and that she is the foreman from the notes. That is solidly proven. That she is one of the likely Karens has in no way been solidly proven.
 
Stranger things have happened (take-out jury instructions, anyone?) but that would mean the judge and various other gov't employees working on the weekend so I would say "no" would be the way to bet.

EDIT: speaking of which, am I the only one who is going to have to work over the weekend catching up on shit I should have gotten done instead of sperging on this thread?
Nah I'm just going to work over today and collect the overtime
 
It was speculation by Barnes on Racket's stream. He said that the woman who joked about the judge not being able to tell if any of them sat on his chair was probably the foreman, because the type of juror to make a joke like that is the 'leader' type that would inevitably snatch up the foreman position. He also said she was a major threat to Kyle because she's probably one of those Yankee aristocrats that all live along the lake, one of the original settlers descendants that are basically New York liberals in the midwest. I think he was basing THAT part of speculation how she spoke to the judge (older man in position of authority that she joked around with as an equal).

I don't know if that's what the guys in this thread basing their posts on, but Barnes has got more experience in a court than me, and he's been right about the defence being stupid cunts already so I'm willing to listen to him on this too.
Barnes is too busy listening to himself talk and expressing his bitterness about the defense that I can totally see him being wrong about this.
 
Sorry to yet again be a double-posting faggot (I blame the liquor for this gross negligent behavior). Maybe a legalfag can answer this question, what exactly is to stop Kyle from just shouting out "Joseph Rosenbaum was a pedo" if upon reading of the verdict he hears anything that doesn't start with "not" to induce a mistrial? Would it not count since the jury has already rendered a verdict? If it would count that would be pretty fucking funny.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Dumb Bitch Smoothie
Yeah but that's spelling, not handwriting. I mean you could probably also figure out if they're a jogger by their spelling--but not necessarily by their handwriting.
You know it's a jogger by spelling because they spell out words by how they pronounce them.

But to add to the speculation claim about the rumored "Karen" being a college professor or something in those lines, do people in academia lean to the more British style because they might consider it proper?
 
1637192635145.jpg


Don't even try to refute this, chuds.

Here's a few articles about Maurice Freeland AKA Jump kick man.



Interview with his wife, they're getting divorced
maurice-freeland.jpeg


Locked down his FB

1637334855468.png

1637335611867.png

Cover photo
1637334972697.png

He forgot to remove a story
1637335092754.png

1637335108958.png

1637335133310.png

1637335158310.png

1637335179775.png

1637335199544.png

1637335221395.png

1637335290100.png

The prosecution clearly stated that they had no idea who he is. If that's untrue then it's a serious violation of the right to face your accusers, as the state has brought charges on behalf of him.

Edit: Although we've already seen several rights violations so I doubt it matters.
 
Last edited:
You know it's a jogger by spelling because they spell out words by how they pronounce them.

But to add to the speculation claim about the rumored "Karen" being a college professor or something in those lines, do people in academia lean to the more British style because they might consider it proper?
We know, for a fact, she only has a bachelor's. No professorship here, that requires -minimum- a master's.
 
"How to weed out Karens on the jury pool" questions:

1. Do you consider yourself a "pet-mom"?
2. Do you shop at Kroger's or Whole Foods for groceries?
3. Do you have a Twitter account?
4. Are you comfortable around guns?
5. How many times do you go to the bar every week?
6. Do you have any children?

If you answer unfavorably to 3 of these questions, you can fuck off.
7. How many cats do you have?
 
Sorry to yet again be a double-posting faggot (I blame the liquor for this gross negligent behavior). Maybe a legalfag can answer this question, what exactly is to stop Kyle from just shouting out "Joseph Rosenbaum was a pedo" if upon reading of the verdict he hears anything that doesn't start with "not" to induce a mistrial? Would it not count since the jury has already rendered a verdict? If it would count that would be pretty fucking funny.
It would probably tack on a Contempt of Court charge, at least.
 
It's honestly not really any worse than a lot of writing you see anymore. In this day and age most people don't actually write with pen and paper anymore.
I guess I must just be an old codger then. In my day we didn’t really have internet the way we do now, it was still pretty new and not a lot of people had access or even knew how to send an email. Hell, we used to have a whole class for handwriting.
 
Sorry to yet again be a double-posting faggot (I blame the liquor for this gross negligent behavior). Maybe a legalfag can answer this question, what exactly is to stop Kyle from just shouting out "Joseph Rosenbaum was a pedo" if upon reading of the verdict he hears anything that doesn't start with "not" to induce a mistrial? Would it not count since the jury has already rendered a verdict? If it would count that would be pretty fucking funny.
doesn't do anything to change the verdict after the fact
if he does it while they're still deliberating that would probably make the judge declare a mistrial
 
I guess I must just be an old codger then. In my day we didn’t really have internet the way we do now, it was still pretty new and not a lot of people had access or even knew how to send an email. Hell, we used to have a whole class for handwriting.
We had typing instead. I wish people still knew cursive though. I learned it in gradeschool, but my brother didn't. Right at the millenial-zoomer cutoff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back