DelusionTree
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Can we send a pair of dueling pistols to the jury room to break the deadlock?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's bullshit, but I believe it. It's 100% in the Judge's interest not to do shit at the moment.
Yes, I'm the whackiest; there's no question I can dancedude singing a cb4 song.
The reason it's hooked so many people in is that it fits the general expected narratives.That stuff about a capital mid word indicating an authoritarian is witchcraft level bs.
Literally this whole trial has been the prosecution putting the burden of proof onto the defense, and being reminded that no, it's them who has to prove shit.Isn't it on the Prosecution to prove something? Not the Defense.
In this case does the state refer to the judge or the prosecution?
The State is always The Prosecution.In this case does the state refer to the judge or the prosecution?
This is for mistrial, and especially for mistrial with prejudice, the defense needs to show evidence of prosecution misconduct.Isn't it on the Prosecution to prove something? Not the Defense.
Which actor will play who in the inevitable movie adaptation?
I already know who'll play Kyle.
I love how all the non BLM/antifa faggots are all boomers.
Does the states opinion on it being a mistrial hold weight or is this just them begging?
the book comes with maumauing the flak catch catcher which shows how the civil street non profits run their side of things.Radical chic - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Technically an essay, not a book. But I am not the one citing it.
The defense has to prove the elements of prosecutorial misconduct are there, the state saying "no u" basically means it has to be properly ajourned.I love how all the non BLM/antifa faggots are all boomers.
Does the states opinion on it being a mistrial hold weight or is this just them begging?
Yeah, violating his 5th Amendment rights is highly prejudical as a matter of law, but I wasn't expecting honesty from Binger. Conversely, I don't expect Richards to do anything but cuck to this in response either. It's so frustrating when Kyle's own counsel aren't zealously advocating on his behalf.That's bullshit, but I believe it. It's 100% in the Judge's interest not to do shit at the moment.
Given how the Rust Belt still votes in Democrats at state and local levels and for example, the Democrat Governor of IL veteoed some gun control shit a couple of years ago.Eh it's entirely possible both would be right. All depends on the gun owner. Unlike a lot of states, in Wisconsin being a gun owner is much less likely to determine political affiliation.
Is she shocked this is what was done? A normal response? Besides being a twit, what was the purpose of this like it's some shocking revelation? The shocking revelation would be if the state agreed.