Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

The Jury made the decision. That being said, I agree.


Fuck Yeah!


He was 17 at the time, not 19.


Let's not victim blame, shall we?

New docs by Mel



Some highlights:
She accuses every judge that ever ruled against her of being corrupt, talks more about her sex life, and goes into great depth about her fantasies of Null's sadistic blood sucking, and his power trips. She also talked about 8chan as well as talking about his alleged promotion of pedophilia (which he has in actually completely condemned).
80 ish pages to say 'NUN UH, YOU'RE THE ONE WHO IS WRONG'
 
Oooooooooooooooooooh her envelopes are being uploaded stilllll. Too bad none of us give enough of a fuck to do anything with a PO Box.

I’m also not going to parse through 80 pages of poorly written garbage. But it pleases me she’s trying to bring up old 8chan shit with no relevance to her case of hurt fee fees. :story:
 
19 is still a child. A child is not ready for that kind of atmosphere. They can't make the best decision around all that at that age. I would not let any of my sons go armed to a protest at 19 years old. All that boy's grief could have been avoided by his parents exercising more dominion over him.
Imagine wanting to cuddle your children into adulthood instead of letting them be adults. There's a lot of shit messed up with this woman.
 
I am not reading 80 pages of her saying, no I don't have to pay his attorney fees cause REEEEE
34 pages. The rest 46 is her informal brief reply to Null's informal brief. Both are bad, but she almost made 1 valid point in her reply to Null's motion to attorney's fees where in she complains that she wasn't notified as per local rule 27(a), which would be a valid point, if the local rule didn't mention it only applied in cases where both parties have a lawyer, and applies only to lawyers.
Screenshot 2021-11-20 041015.png
We rely on the selfless service of @Useful_Mistake to read this nonsense for us.
I might give an in-depth summary/analysis later on. Probably not today though.
 
34 pages. The rest 46 is her informal brief reply to Null's informal brief. Both are bad, but she almost made 1 valid point in her reply to Null's motion to attorney's fees where in she complains that she wasn't notified as per local rule 27(a), which would be a valid point, if the local rule didn't mention it only applied in cases where both parties have a lawyer, and applies only to lawyers.
View attachment 2733548

I might give an in-depth summary/analysis later on. Probably not today though.
If it looks like she may have a point it's always best to read further because she wont have one.
 
Imagine wanting to cuddle your children into adulthood instead of letting them be adults. There's a lot of shit messed up with this woman.
Well. I recall in the great state of Alabama, the legal age is 19. And children staying in the home past age 18 isn’t that odd. Most of them are too dumb to be able to even book their own appointments, let alone start living their own life. I wouldn’t call stopping an idiotic 17 year old baby face from prancing around with a rifle (he can’t legally carry) coddling or bad parenting. But everything I’ve stated applies to families with some semblance of normalcy.
 
In spite of the fact that this will be helpful advice to a legal lolcow, for my own sanity, @TamarYaelBatYah , please buy a copy of the Bluebook and use it. If you're going to continue being a pro se litigant, it is the best $45 you will ever spend.

Of course, this advice will be disregarded.
isn't the online version like $39 a year?

I would also recommend Black's Law Dictionary, not sure what Edition it's at now though.
 
Last edited:
1637375079606.png
It's self defense in VA law, not murder. Anyone affiliated or acting on behalf of the Cyberstalking entity known as KiwiFarms.net, including its owner Joshua Moon, is automatically a threat to my physical safety and therefore, I will shoot immediately. Without Mercy.
Naughty, naughty!
 
In spite of the fact that this will be helpful advice to a legal lolcow, for my own sanity, @TamarYaelBatYah , please buy a copy of the Bluebook and use it. If you're going to continue being a pro se litigant, it is the best $45 you will ever spend.

Of course, this advice will be disregarded.
You can't spend SNAP on a blue book can you? That might be welfare fraud that a patriotic Kiwi might report


Is that Melinda lying about something easily provable? Not a good look
 
rifle (he can’t legally carry)

He can legally carry it though.
isn't the online version like $39 a year?
Yup.
I would also recommend Black's Law Dictionary, not sure what Edition it's at now though.
11th
Is that Melinda lying about something easily provable? Not a good look
Nothing new
 
So basically you failed at breastfeeding because you don't follow The Torah and you want to act like you're just a victim of your body's wierdness.
Considering I've produced enough milk to feed two children on top of my own... You're wrong. I have however watched some pretty awesome women go through those problems. Your made up rule that they have to follow Torah to breastfeed successfully is bull. But you already know that.
No, you're not a victim. You're evil and that's why you had dried up your breasts. One's own evil manifests to destroy the body.
Who said I ever claimed victimhood? I haven't been pregnant in a decade. If I was still lactating it would be a sign things were wrong.
I never had any problems breastfeeding all 6 of my children for a total of 12 years so far. Hm, I wonder why!
Because you are in the same position as many other women regardless of their belief system and regardless of how good or evil they are - your body responds well to breastfeeding. You would invalidate those who have trouble which is evil in and of itself - true misogyny. You worship a false idol. I suggest you step off that pedestal because Elohim will wait a long time to take necessary vengeance. Elohim will not be mocked.
 
Did she introduce a quote to completely validate the argument that she is not suing for IIED but another reason? Look at page 14 of her response to fees. I think she did.


I believe she has a reading disability. It's why she can't read anything or if she does, she can't understand it.

I agree with this. She seems to have a hard time parsing things out of paragraphs and sentences. She'll read something, completely not get it, and let her imagination fill in the blanks.

Honestly, i think it's deeper than that. Not simply a reading disability but a general cognitive disability, which combined with the generalized paranoia and Cluster B is just fucking her ability to cogently comprehend the world up.

Anyways, @TamarYaelBatYah have you ever had sexual relations with any of your cousins, yes or no. If you answer we can stop asking.
 
Back