Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why do they care? This case isn't really related to Jacob Blake at all other than the fact it happened during the riots in his name. If anything, it's Jacob Blake's fault that those rioters were killed. If he didn't try to kidnap his girlfriends kids and threaten people with a knife none of this shit would have happened.
 
View attachment 2734920
View attachment 2734921
I've seen that "argument" today and yesterday alot and I don't understand it. All of them love to justify their chimpouts by saying that shit, but NOONE MAKES THEM CHOOSE BETWEEN VANDALIZE AND MURDER.
I don't understand.

It's weasel words trying to justify them being shit human beings. Ignore it for the mewling idiocy it is.

When someone breaks into your home to help themselves to property you may have worked your whole life for, they made a conscious decision that the risks involved were worth the possibility of personally enriching themselves. You and any means you choose to use are just the other side of that transaction when that possibility comes up short.

If you don't want to get killed by people who don't want you stealing their shit, not stealing their shit is the easiest possible solution and costs absolutely nothing. Anyone telling you otherwise is just fishing for a fucking excuse.
 
screencapture-twitter-search-2021-11-20-06_36_55.png
screencapture-twitter-search-2021-11-20-06_36_56.png
asdf.png
SEETHE
 
One of the things that baffles me about this case is that all these brainlets look at Rittenhouse and unironically believe he is a “right wing death squad dork.” You don’t have to be an expert at reading people to immediately recognize how absurd that is, it’s absurd on its face (or, in this case, on his face). He doesn’t have the eyes of a man who would kill for sport, nor even for politics. I don’t think I’m delusional for saying this, I’m sure other people understand what I mean
He was a dumb kid who was arguably in the wrong place at the wrong time, but that's just a prudence consideration. He had every legal and moral right to be there, he had every legal and moral right to have the gun he had, and when terrorists tried to murder him, he had every legal and moral right to shoot the motherfuckers.

The opposite legal argument is basically the same one hurled at every rape victim that she shouldn't have been skimpily dressed in a dark alley. She'd still have the right to shoot the rapist.
 
View attachment 2734920
View attachment 2734921
I've seen that "argument" today and yesterday alot and I don't understand it. All of them love to justify their chimpouts by saying that shit, but NOONE MAKES THEM CHOOSE BETWEEN VANDALIZE AND MURDER.
I don't understand.
you're supposed to simply lay down and allow the mob to brutalize you, your home, your car and your business to their hearts content. that's racial justice.
 
View attachment 2734920
View attachment 2734921
I've seen that "argument" today and yesterday alot and I don't understand it. All of them love to justify their chimpouts by saying that shit, but NOONE MAKES THEM CHOOSE BETWEEN VANDALIZE AND MURDER.
I don't understand.
That's how they justified those two black girls that tried to steal the Asian man's car for a joy ride, which ended with his death and them getting off relatively scot free.

Easy to say that when it's not your property (and means of supporting family) on the line.
 
you're supposed to simply lay down and allow the mob to brutalize you, your home, your car and your business to their hearts content. that's racial justice.
That's more or less the core argument of "Critical Racial Theory," which these assholes will claim doesn't even exist when called out on it.
 
Arguably further because a bunch of leftoids now have to come to terms that they can't initiate violence with impunity while expecting normal citizens to just roll over and get beaten/raped/killed.

She kind of looks like Julia Maxwell but with glasses and a slightly sharper nose:
View attachment 2734342
(who is age appropriate, so go wild thirsty bois & coomers)
Imagine getting not Guilty and look up a New Zealand Agriculture forum thirsting over one of your sisters.
 
A person who is right next to an "active shooter" will have a fight or flight response. Its a primal instinct. They will either run away or attack. But when Rittenhouse started defending himself, several of his attackers stopped and put their hands up. Proving they did not believe he was an "active shooter."
 
When someone breaks into your home to help themselves to property you may have worked your whole life for, they made a conscious decision that the risks involved were worth the possibility of personally enriching themselves. You and any means you choose to use are just the other side of that transaction when that possibility comes up short.
There's a slight difference in that even in non-"Castle Doctrine" states, you are generally presumed to have the fear of deadly harm when encountering a person in your own home, and to treat such intruders appropriately.
 
One of the things that baffles me about this case is that all these brainlets look at Rittenhouse and unironically believe he is a “right wing death squad dork.” You don’t have to be an expert at reading people to immediately recognize how absurd that is, it’s absurd on its face (or, in this case, on his face). He doesn’t have the eyes of a man who would kill for sport, nor even for politics. I don’t think I’m delusional for saying this, I’m sure other people understand what I mean
Pure political brainwashing imo. You don't need to be an expert to look at someone's body language and have a good estimation of what they are like/thinking. It's a built in survival/social mechanic to read someone's behavior and make a snap judgement about it.

These are the same people who can watch him have a panic attack/break down when he got to the part where Rosenbaum attacked him in his direct and believe he's faking tears like a psychopath, but equally think that Gage's sole Hollywood style single tear is 110% super legit.
 
Riot declared in Portland LMFAO


Update (Saturday 0715 ET): The reports turned out to be correct. Protests were seen in multiple cities, and a riot was declared in Portland, Oregon, hours after Kyle Rittenhouse’s acquittal.
 
A person who is right next to an "active shooter" will have a fight or flight response. Its a primal instinct. They will either run away or attack. But when Rittenhouse started defending himself, several of his attackers stopped and put their hands up. Proving they did not believe he was an "active shooter."

That and he broke the mob's feeling of invulnerability.

Once the first guy went down the morons around them realised it was no longer a LARP to go set empty buildings and gas stations on fire and their actions had now very serious consequences. Most of them do tend to cuck out when actually given a threat, or when they try and go up against others (as we saw in the Seattle Street battles) it wasn't going to be like when most of these black bloc goons go against the police, where you get tackled and a cup of coffee while waiting in a holding cell to be released because fucking clown world.

No, instead it was full blown "oh I could be actually fucking hurt doing this shit." and is why the majority put their hands up.

They're bullies and cowards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back