- Joined
- May 25, 2021
will the wokels ever turn on him for not deleting and therefore probably still monetizing his former fashy SS officer aesthetic or will xe get a free pass?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They can barely remember what they were supposed to be outraged about yesterday, you think they'll actually remember thatwill the wokels ever turn on him for not deleting and therefore probably still monetizing his former fashy SS officer aesthetic or will xe get a free pass?
i mean they still remember Gamergate so anything is possibleThey can barely remember what they were supposed to be outraged about yesterday, you think they'll actually remember that
Is this why Jim keeps making the same video over and over, to ensure he never forgets?They can barely remember what they were supposed to be outraged about yesterday, you think they'll actually remember that
I know I'm pretty late in responding to this, but Jim's criticism of the game falls apart completely when you consider one fact: that it's clearly an attempt at a 3D remake of the NES game.Here's what pisses me off. This entire video could be boiled down to him looking at the camera and saying "game as shit" and I would still have an equally good understanding of why this game is shit. If you're going to make a video reviewing a game, especially as a "critic" like Jim, actually explain what is(n't) good about the game. Jim doesn't know what he's doing anymore. I don't mean that in a "he's incompetent" way, because I've read Jim's reviews long before he was making videos and up until the end. No, he knows how to review a game.
What he doesn't know is if he is trying to inform the viewer and critique the game, or if he is trying to entertain the viewer. There is a gradient between these two points of game reviews, critique and commentary, but he needs to know where he falls on it. He doesn't know anymore. He's just spouting out shit. He doesn't know if he's Skill Up, who gives fairly dry but informative reviews, or if he's Max0r, who "reviews" games by giving you an epileptic seizure leaving you foaming at the mouth as he memes on you for 10-30 minutes while telling you why he does or does not like the game, explaining more than you'd expect about the game itself, and still somehow being more intelligent about it than Jim.
There are people in between these two points as well too, Mandalore is closer to Skill Up, but still entertaining and likes to sneak in discreet jokes and memes (there is a moment in his System Shock 2 review where an enemy says "silence the discord" and the discord message beep plays in a blink and you miss it joke), and is very aware of the memes around him, playing off them such as when he occasionally deadpan references and plays off the associations between him and SsethTzeenach and the meme of them being the same person but on or off of their meds respectively. Speaking of him, there is SsethTzeentach who is mostly memes, but actually leaves you understanding the game he just reviewed and you know whether or not you'd want to play it by the end, though he isn't as meme heavy as Max0r. There are other YouTubers who cover that space between dry yet informative and pure entertainment reviews such as TheRussianBadger, RagnarRox, Shammy, and Raycevick. They are all in different places along the line, all of them have different goals as reviewers and YouTubers, but they all know what they are trying to do. I also can use the tastes of any of them as a barometer to know my opinion of a game, I've figured out what their respective likes and dislikes are and even if I don't agree with their opinions, I know how I will agree or disagree.
Jim's opinions are non-existent. He says whatever will get the most ass pats. I can't judge if I will or will not like something based on them, nor the footage he uses as he cherry picks his footage and most of it is disconnected and random. I can't tell what the fuck he's aiming for, what his actual thoughts and opinions are, what the point is beyond a platform for him to bitch about unrelated crap and get views.
Personally I like the entire spectrum of dry to funny review content, so long as the person has opinions to share and a passion for the subject matter or the art form in general, yet Jim doesn't have either.
I know I'm pretty late in responding to this, but Jim's criticism of the game falls apart completely when you consider one fact: that it's clearly an attempt at a 3D remake of the NES game.
With that added context, the problems Jim has with the game (its simplicity, its repetitiveness, etc.) become irrelevant. I don't know if he didn't mention this because he genuinely didn't know, or if he realised that bringing it to the viewer's attention would expose the fact he has nothing to really complain about and he's grasping at straws for content.
It's so blatantly no-budget that most people's immediate reaction was just making shitposts entirely comprised of that fucking death animation. if not for that trend Jim probably wouldn't have caught wind of it in the first place, this is his way of riding a trend.it was probably also made with like no budget too.
I should compare the new game to the NES sometime for fun. I didn't bother to even check if it was some remake of some ancient game, I didn't think anyone would bother with shovelware.I know I'm pretty late in responding to this, but Jim's criticism of the game falls apart completely when you consider one fact: that it's clearly an attempt at a 3D remake of the NES game.
With that added context, the problems Jim has with the game (its simplicity, its repetitiveness, etc.) become irrelevant. I don't know if he didn't mention this because he genuinely didn't know, or if he realised that bringing it to the viewer's attention would expose the fact he has nothing to really complain about and he's grasping at straws for content.
I think you're dead on with your assessment, except for him being bisexual. I think he's whatever the emotional validation equivalent of 'gay for pay' would be. I don't buy for a minute he's actually attracted to men because whenever he talks about how gay he is it comes across extremely insincere and performative; like girls who pretend to be lesbian to rebel against their parents.I don't see Jim as having a solid sexuality. Just as someone who needs attention from any source. I honestly buy him as base bisexual since he may lust over women but as Mr. Mint pointed out he's been bicurious in the past but couldn't express it due to already having a wife then but who knows.
His main sexuality is ego stroking, followed by attention, agp, and whatever is at the core of his sexuality, straight or bi.
I think it goes deeper than just faking his attraction to dick, but also his kinks.I think you're dead on with your assessment, except for him being bisexual. I think he's whatever the emotional validation equivalent of 'gay for pay' would be. I don't buy for a minute he's actually attracted to men because whenever he talks about how gay he is it comes across extremely insincere and performative; like girls who pretend to be lesbian to rebel against their parents.
That's not to say Jim wouldn't get it on with dudes though. Unlike the coward Kevin Gibes, I have no doubt Jim would and has jumped at any opportunity for relations with anyone willing, but I think it's purely to sate his need to be wanted, rather than out of any actual genuine attraction or physical desires.
He's incredibly surface level. Having read the research papers on how exploit the human psyche for lootbox sales, Jim doesn't even begin to realize how awful it is. Jim doesn't research that much, he could go deeper, but he doesn't. He's lazy and doing more would take work.This might be an extremely stupid idea but funny enough I think Jim Sterling could have had a better career if he pursued something like Marketing or Business- or even being a Fraud Analyst- considering the fact the videos he produces on the "shady business" aspects of the Video Game Industry and admittedly very well-researched- especially due to the fact that alot of the business models propped up by companies like EA in regards to loot-boxes is somewhat experimental due to the fact it blurs the legal "line in the sand" between Gambling and Entertainment.
I wishNext time Jim brings up how the UK is literally genociding trans people in the streets, point him to this thread, which he can't ignore as they're trying and failing to virtue signal.
0 killed in the UK in the last 3 years. According to that, 375 trans people were killed worldwide last year, against a total rate of around 464,000
So roughly 0.08%. I'm surprised he even leaves the house. Oh wait, he doesn't.
Jim's 'research' is reading the first paragraph of a Kotaku article on whatever he wants to be angry about this week, maybe skimming the wiki, and then filling the gaps with hot takes and cherry-picked 'evidence' from his Twitter echo chamber.This might be an extremely stupid idea but funny enough I think Jim Sterling could have had a better career if he pursued something like Marketing or Business- or even being a Fraud Analyst- considering the fact the videos he produces on the "shady business" aspects of the Video Game Industry and admittedly very well-researched- especially due to the fact that alot of the business models propped up by companies like EA in regards to loot-boxes is somewhat experimental due to the fact it blurs the legal "line in the sand" between Gambling and Entertainment.
Ah but you're using the stats of bigotted police who are at the forefront of the transgender genocide! Clearly this data is fake and you're just another alt-right transphobe boomer who wants to cover up how literally hundreds, maybe even thousands and possibly millions of transpeople are being cut down in the street every year.Next time Jim brings up how the UK is literally genociding trans people in the streets, point him to this thread, which he can't ignore as they're trying and failing to virtue signal.
0 killed in the UK in the last 3 years. According to that, 375 trans people were killed worldwide last year, against a total rate of around 464,000
So roughly 0.08%. I'm surprised he even leaves the house. Oh wait, he doesn't.
Yes, he does remind me of that "only gay in the village" from Little Brittain, and somehow manages to look worse, by comparison. And the one from Little Brittain is supposed to be a parody.That's not to say Jim wouldn't get it on with dudes though. Unlike the coward Kevin Gibes, I have no doubt Jim would and has jumped at any opportunity for relations with anyone willing, but I think it's purely to sate his need to be wanted, rather than out of any actual genuine attraction or physical desires.
I bet that’s the kind of thing they keep as backup in case he ever slips up and says the wrong thing or supports the wrong person.will the wokels ever turn on him for not deleting and therefore probably still monetizing his former fashy SS officer aesthetic or will xe get a free pass?
His feelings do not care about your facts. The police are probably lying anyway.Next time Jim brings up how the UK is literally genociding trans people in the streets, point him to this thread, which he can't ignore as they're trying and failing to virtue signal.
0 killed in the UK in the last 3 years. According to that, 375 trans people were killed worldwide last year, against a total rate of around 464,000
So roughly 0.08%. I'm surprised he even leaves the house. Oh wait, he doesn't.