Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
There's a lot of jewish progressives and jews in positions of power (in Hollywood, the government, ivy league schools, banks, etc) and some people assume it means jews are conspiring to destroy whites. It's a theory based on half truths, not unlike the stuff some black people believe about white supremacy.

View attachment 2735815

It's impossible to deny that jews hold a lot of power, though.
What half truths?
 
Is it true he plans to sue all the people who slagged him off, or is he strictly "Fuck this shit, I'm out?"
 
Yeah I personally don't understand the Jewspiracy sperging.
Like I'll chuckle at the old "watcha doing there, Rabbi?" or "wars for Israel" meme - as well as mock leftoid & journoroach attempts to label anything and everything as "antisemitism"; but I just can't follow the whole "Jews are trying to destroy muh preshus whyte culture!" sperging.
It's just people who don't understand that Jews are mad at God, not gentiles. He made it pretty clear they fucked up and lost His favor so they're lashing out at creation and trying to prove him wrong.
 
Some actual useful information to offset the edgy Zoomers who think they invented racism.
This is on the status of Kenosha Kyle's bail money. The grifters are out to profit and get their cut of the loot.


This story has been updated to include a comment from John Pierce.
The next battle in the Kyle Rittenhouse case is likely to be over money.

Rittenhouse, 18, was free on $2 million bond since last November, the money raised by donors and posted by former Rittenhouse attorney John Pierce with a cashier’s check from his law firm Pierce Bainbridge. Another early Rittenhouse attorney, Lin Wood, has stated the money was provided by the FightBack Foundation, which he operates. Wood has issued statements indicating that the money should come back to him.

On Friday, at a press conference after the jury returned a not guilty verdict, Rittenhouse defense attorney Mark Richards took a shot at Pierce and Wood and indicated there would be a fight over the money.

Asked by a reporter about the turning point in the criminal case, Richards said, “Getting rid of the first two lawyers.”

Pierce and Wood began representing themselves as Rittenhouse’s attorneys days after the Aug. 25, 2020, shooting, and began using his case for fundraising. Among the donors to the FightBack Foundation and Rittenhouse’s cause were MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell and former child actor Ricky Schroder.

Pierce began talking about bringing on a “SEAL team” of criminal defense attorneys, and began shopping out Rittenhouse and his mother for interviews as they sought to raise the teenager’s profile as a conservative cause.

But Wood left the Rittenhouse case shortly after the bond was posted, and Pierce was fired by the Rittenhouse amily, with angry statements coming out on social media from the Rittenhouse camp about Pierce’s handling of money.

On Friday, asked about the bond money, Richards said that was in dispute.

“I suspect there will be a fight over that,” Richards said. “John Pierce is the person who posted the bond. All that money was raised on behalf of Kyle. Lin Wood and FightBack say they are entitled to it. There was half a million dollars I think that came directly from Wendy Rittenhouse from money she raised. So there’s going to be a fight over that, and I’m just thankful there will be a fight over that.”

Under normal circumstances, at the close of trial, bond money is returned to the person who posted it.
In September, Kenosha-based attorney Xavier Solis sent a letter to the court on the behalf of Wood demanding that the money be returned to FightBack.

“Money makes people do silly things,” a Twitter account associated with the Rittenhouse family posted after the letter was sent to the court. “While we’re busting our humps trying to raise money and see Kyle acquitted, Lin Wood is sending letters to the court DURING Kyle’s hearing to demand $2M in donations FOR KYLE be given to HIM.”

Pierce said in a statement Friday: “Unfortunately, manufactured controversy, such as the social media speculation about the bail money is nothing more than a distraction designed to discredit me, as I prepare to defend many more people who are being abused for political gain.”
Richards said all of that in the interview given right after the verdict that I posted yesterday
 
Jews basically figured out how much America runs on nepotism and oligarchy. They wormed their way into positions of powers and favor jews over non-jews. They'll trip over themselves to help other jews get ahead and keep others, especially whites, down.

But it's a systemic problem. I could wave my magic Hitler wand and get rid of all the jews tomorrow and nothing's stopping the Chinese from moving in to do the exact same thing, or Cubans or Russians or whatever. It's frustrating the alt-right sees all this and thinks that jews are the source of the problem and not the system itself that allowed jews to amass so much power and use it against the American people.
I would agree but real life and the news has convinced me that as a group, jews must be damned by G-d to be evil or something. I dont particularly like the Chinese either, but their entire existence and culture isn't built around rebellion against their (perception of) God. This is especially true for the powerful jews who dropped the religious laws completely and use jewishness as a mechanism for their own lust for power.
 
Eurofag here so bully me, but I have a question. As one user has pointed out before, doesn’t President Biden‘s statement on Kyle Rittenhouse’s veredict violate the separation of powers? Is there no type of legal impediment that prevents a member of the executive from ruling a decision of the juridiary? It doesn’t seem correct to me that a member of the government can rule on judicial decisions.
No, it's not. It is kind of a breach of decorum by having the President comment on what is legally a local jurisdiction matter, but they haven't cared about that since Obama.
 
I would agree but real life and the news has convinced me that as a group, jews must be damned by G-d to be evil or something. I dont particularly like the Chinese either, but their entire existence and culture isn't built around rebellion against their (perception of) God. This is especially true for the powerful jews who dropped the religious laws completely and use jewishness as a mechanism for their own lust for power.
Certainly, my point is that the utterly broken system in America that runs on nepotism and the question of whether or not jews are the manifestation of evil are separate issues. The far right tends to get to the JQ and just stay there.
 
This makes me so homesick for North Carolina. Southern Appalachia is a special place.

Goddamn I feel so bad for what Kyle has had to go through and what he'll carry with him for the rest of his life. I'm happy the jury saw sense and made the right decision but it still is just so fucked up, I can't help but feel maternal towards the kid. This should never have gone to trial.
Do they have "decoration" where you live now? I try to explain it to people and everyone agrees that it's a wonderful tradition, but that they've never heard of it.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Matt Damon
So in downtime this goes from yellow fever to handwriting to eugenics. This place really is /pol/ lmao

Race differences just keep people who aren't at the top at each other's throats. Haves vs the have nots, and even among the haves they are ruled by their fear of the have nots by the have mores. It's the world against the .01 percent. OWS was right about that.
 
Honestly, you Americans should be proud that your right to self defense has been cemented in a (even though it should not have been) highly controversial trial. You actually are allowed to protect yourselves if someone tries to injure or take your life. In shithole Eurocuck land we are not allowed to defend ourselves, we are not allowed to use more force than what is being used against us. In other words, regardless of me having a weapons-license and the aggressor not having one, they have to shoot me for me being allowed to shoot them. God bless the united states of America! I hope you guys can work past your differences and once again be a model country for the rest of the world. You are the hope of the western world.
 
What half truths?
There's no evidence that there's a large group of jews conspiring to throw white people under the bus. There's powerful jews, there's loxists, there's progressive jews spewing anti-white propaganda (like their progressive white friends) but those categories don't always overlap. Most jews are just normal people.
 
This case has been mentioned before, but it bears repeating. Here's your black Kyle.


Killed police with an illegal firearm (that he's facing separate charges for), still got off on self-defense, on the same day no less. I guess he's lucky he didn't cross state lines.
My understanding is that he didn't even kill any cops, it's that cops killed the girlfriend but they put the blame on him for shooting at them, sort of a "look at what you made us do!" case.
 
1637440683156.png

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back