Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe Binger wasn't just handed this case; no surprise, given that he's an activist, as reported in 2016.
Kenosha — One of the first cases to test a lesser-known aspect of Wisconsin's 2011 concealed weapons law came before a judge Monday.
The issue is whether you can drive with a loaded handgun within reach, even without having a concealed carry permit.
Guy A. Smith, a 52-year-old commercial truck driver from Merrill, believes, as does a gun rights organization, that you can. That's why he said he made no effort to hide his revolver when inspectors entered his big rig at a weigh station in Pleasant Prairie in June.

Inspectors saw it on the floor of his cab via an overhead camera, then approached Smith and cited him for carrying a concealed weapon, a misdemeanor, and seized his gun.
Smith's case was set for a jury trial Monday, but the prosecutor seemed ambushed by the defense claim that a different Wisconsin law seems to specifically allow Smith's actions. The statute on transport of weapons says,
" ... no person may place, possess, or transport a firearm, bow, or crossbow in or on a vehicle, unless one of the following applies: 1. The firearm is unloaded or is a handgun."

Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger said that's a question of law that Smith's attorney should have brought up before trial.
The defense position "would suggest anyone without a permit can drive around with a loaded weapon in the vehicle," Binger said. "I decline to read the statute so broadly." He said Wisconsin's concealed carry law, Act 35, would have no meaning.

"No meaning in cars," Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder clarified. Smith's attorney, John Monroe, raised a second possible defense: that for a truck driver like Smith, his cab is at times his place of business and his residence. In either place, people who are legally entitled to possess a gun can have one for self-defense without a concealed carry permit, according to state law.

Binger argued that Smith could easily have gotten a permit, which would allow him to carry the gun in his truck. "We still have a law against concealed carry without a permit, despite the efforts" of gun rights advocates.
After the hearing, Smith said he didn't get a permit because he didn't need to.
"I'm just a trucker trying to stay alive," he said. "I want my gun back, and I don't want a record, and I'm not paying a fine. I didn't do anything wrong."

Schroeder agreed with Monroe that Act 35 was part of "a revolution" in the law concerning guns. "People have different views," he said. "Some feel more protected with firearms, and it used to be an opposite view" that prevailed among lawmakers.
The judge agreed with Binger that it would have been more convenient for Monroe to raise his defenses in pretrial discussion or motions but noted Monroe was not obligated to do so. Binger had indicated that if Schroeder was inclined to agree with Monroe and dismiss the case, the state would appeal.

Schroeder instead decided to adjourn the case a few months to allow both sides to brief the issues of the possibly conflicting statutes.
Wisconsin Carry Inc., a gun rights group, is providing Smith's defense. Monroe, his attorney, has won numerous other gun-related cases on behalf of the group.
"As the Wisconsin Legislature attempts to restore freedoms in Wisconsin like other states have already done, we cannot have rogue DAs and courts imposing their legacy approach to gun rights, which is no longer supported by statute," said Nik Clark, president of Wisconsin Carry.

He said the group chose to help Smith because his case was "clean," without any clouding issues of alcohol, traffic infractions or a related crime scene and would be a good way to clarify the Legislature's intent to allow people to transport loaded handguns in their vehicles without a concealed carry license.
 
To do it without the copypasta, I dunno either. It was one of those cyclical memes that comes around every few years, but it's stuck around this time when it coincided with The Frontier fiasco, and it's become an alternative to the cope/seethe/dilate combo.
I guess it's fair to say right leaning memes are alot like swear words, extremely versatile and can take on whole new meanings based on context.


While the left thinks essays are how you meme.
 
Yikes, why would a university need to release a statement on the verdict?

View attachment 2736136


That fucking campus is majority slants, gooks, chinks, japs, bad drivers and femoids with sideways pussies.

The coverage just to recap, is just pure bullshit here over the trial, and a news anchor described his rifle as an "AK style" rifle last night plus some small protest in Oakland but no one cares because its Oakland and there is nothing left to steal there.
 
I feel like the rittenhouse trial did a great job of publicizing that in Wisconsin there are very robust self defense laws, which is why there was not rioting anywhere to be seen this weekend yet. If I was in the state legislature I would work on putting that Kyle Rittenhouse self-defense bill into law and penalize prosecutors who abuse the process.
 
I know it was discussed earlier on how the left is trying to spin it as “if Kyle were black than..”, but has anyone else heard them talk about how abuse victims who killed their abuser are jailed, but not Rittenhouse? My mom was sharing that FaceBook meme last night.
 
MasonicJudge.jpg


meds.jpg


Some good ol' off his meds Mason stuff on /pol/
 
Glad Kyle is free

Does this mean its open season on Antifa during riots? I have some rubber bullets for my glock but i never used them last year because i was worried about consequences...but a couple of times i found myself in the shit. In Tampa me and some other dudes had to fist fight our way out of a crowd of lunatic Antifa types. We were followed for almost a mile down Fowler Avenue with shit thrown at us and cops had totally just retreated and did nothing.

I literally had people's faces on the barrel of my gun in some of the riots in Orlando and Tampa screaming at me at times.

So can I shoot them now?

What sort of precedent does this set?

God I want to shoot these people. Somebody tell me its OK to shoot these faggots and ill shoot them. It seems like its ok now after this trial
 

I would like to take this moment to remind everyone that Alabama has this thing called an anti mask law. It means that everyone would have to have their faces visible while threatening to burn down the area.

Alabama also has an anti-arson law, IIRC where if you try to commit arson, shooting you is self defense. Also, there is a credible threat clause for self defense. All of this is due to the KKK I believe. In other words, due to their history of burning places to the ground while masked, literally everyone can load up and defend their properties, just because of the threat they pose with this combo.

Imagine if every state had laws like this. Would you be seeing this? No. No you would not.

Just pointing this out because a “backwoods” Southern state has solved this problem for decades while New York, a “bastion of civilization” doesn’t.
 
Kyle is the most baby-faced motherfucker. The pictures of him in the fire fighter and police outfits look photoshopped because he has such a baby face. Are we sure he's not just three babies stacked on top of each other?
Ah, now we see the alternate timeline where Kyle was unarmed legal defence of the child rapist.
"It looked like three babies, what else could he do?"
 
Glad Kyle is free

Does this mean its open season on Antifa during riots? I have some rubber bullets for my glock but i never used them last year because i was worried about consequences...but a couple of times i found myself in the shit. In Tampa me and some other dudes had to fist fight our way out of a crowd of lunatic Antifa types. We were followed for almost a mile with shit thrown at us and cops had totally just retreated.

I literally had people's faces on the barrel of my gun in some of the riots in Orlando and Tampa screaming at me at times.

So can I shoot them now?

What sort of precedent does this set?

God I want to shoot these people. Somebody tell me its OK to shoot these faggots and ill shoot them. It seems like its ok now after this trial
A trial verdict in Wisconsin doesn't change a single damn thing about the law in Florida.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Merrick
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back