Jim Sterling / James "Stephanie" Sterling / James Stanton/Sexton & in memoriam TotalBiscuit (John Bain) - One Gaming Lolcow Thread

Original:
Archive (480p):
View attachment 2702186
Here's what pisses me off. This entire video could be boiled down to him looking at the camera and saying "game as shit" and I would still have an equally good understanding of why this game is shit. If you're going to make a video reviewing a game, especially as a "critic" like Jim, actually explain what is(n't) good about the game. Jim doesn't know what he's doing anymore. I don't mean that in a "he's incompetent" way, because I've read Jim's reviews long before he was making videos and up until the end. No, he knows how to review a game.

What he doesn't know is if he is trying to inform the viewer and critique the game, or if he is trying to entertain the viewer. There is a gradient between these two points of game reviews, critique and commentary, but he needs to know where he falls on it. He doesn't know anymore. He's just spouting out shit. He doesn't know if he's Skill Up, who gives fairly dry but informative reviews, or if he's Max0r, who "reviews" games by giving you an epileptic seizure leaving you foaming at the mouth as he memes on you for 10-30 minutes while telling you why he does or does not like the game, explaining more than you'd expect about the game itself, and still somehow being more intelligent about it than Jim.

There are people in between these two points as well too, Mandalore is closer to Skill Up, but still entertaining and likes to sneak in discreet jokes and memes (there is a moment in his System Shock 2 review where an enemy says "silence the discord" and the discord message beep plays in a blink and you miss it joke), and is very aware of the memes around him, playing off them such as when he occasionally deadpan references and plays off the associations between him and SsethTzeenach and the meme of them being the same person but on or off of their meds respectively. Speaking of him, there is SsethTzeentach who is mostly memes, but actually leaves you understanding the game he just reviewed and you know whether or not you'd want to play it by the end, though he isn't as meme heavy as Max0r. There are other YouTubers who cover that space between dry yet informative and pure entertainment reviews such as TheRussianBadger, RagnarRox, Shammy, and Raycevick. They are all in different places along the line, all of them have different goals as reviewers and YouTubers, but they all know what they are trying to do. I also can use the tastes of any of them as a barometer to know my opinion of a game, I've figured out what their respective likes and dislikes are and even if I don't agree with their opinions, I know how I will agree or disagree.

Jim's opinions are non-existent. He says whatever will get the most ass pats. I can't judge if I will or will not like something based on them, nor the footage he uses as he cherry picks his footage and most of it is disconnected and random. I can't tell what the fuck he's aiming for, what his actual thoughts and opinions are, what the point is beyond a platform for him to bitch about unrelated crap and get views.

Personally I like the entire spectrum of dry to funny review content, so long as the person has opinions to share and a passion for the subject matter or the art form in general, yet Jim doesn't have either.
I know I'm pretty late in responding to this, but Jim's criticism of the game falls apart completely when you consider one fact: that it's clearly an attempt at a 3D remake of the NES game.


With that added context, the problems Jim has with the game (its simplicity, its repetitiveness, etc.) become irrelevant. I don't know if he didn't mention this because he genuinely didn't know, or if he realised that bringing it to the viewer's attention would expose the fact he has nothing to really complain about and he's grasping at straws for content.
 
I know I'm pretty late in responding to this, but Jim's criticism of the game falls apart completely when you consider one fact: that it's clearly an attempt at a 3D remake of the NES game.


With that added context, the problems Jim has with the game (its simplicity, its repetitiveness, etc.) become irrelevant. I don't know if he didn't mention this because he genuinely didn't know, or if he realised that bringing it to the viewer's attention would expose the fact he has nothing to really complain about and he's grasping at straws for content.


it was probably also made with like no budget too.
 
it was probably also made with like no budget too.
It's so blatantly no-budget that most people's immediate reaction was just making shitposts entirely comprised of that fucking death animation. if not for that trend Jim probably wouldn't have caught wind of it in the first place, this is his way of riding a trend.
 
His "I've seen some bad games, but man this is bad" speech at the end seems overblown, and if that wasn't him calling it a damn scam certainly is. Not saying it's great, not even saying it's good, but I've seen far worse. Like 90 percent of the shit he covered on his Steam Greenlight commentaries is easily worse. Also there's a shit ton of license games that came out back in the day which were comparable in depth to Popeye, and in a lot of those cases they would be full priced retail games, while this game's only 12 bucks. Hell, we just had the GTA3 remasters happen, and honestly you might be better off with goddamn Popeye than those at the moment.
 
Next time Jim brings up how the UK is literally genociding trans people in the streets, point him to this thread, which he can't ignore as they're trying and failing to virtue signal.


0 killed in the UK in the last 3 years. According to that, 375 trans people were killed worldwide last year, against a total rate of around 464,000


So roughly 0.08%. I'm surprised he even leaves the house. Oh wait, he doesn't.
 
I know I'm pretty late in responding to this, but Jim's criticism of the game falls apart completely when you consider one fact: that it's clearly an attempt at a 3D remake of the NES game.


With that added context, the problems Jim has with the game (its simplicity, its repetitiveness, etc.) become irrelevant. I don't know if he didn't mention this because he genuinely didn't know, or if he realised that bringing it to the viewer's attention would expose the fact he has nothing to really complain about and he's grasping at straws for content.
I should compare the new game to the NES sometime for fun. I didn't bother to even check if it was some remake of some ancient game, I didn't think anyone would bother with shovelware.
 
I'd forgotten Jim Sterling existed until I saw this thread, I guess he no longer exists since he seems to have been possessed by an autogynephilic demon called Stephanie.

The YouTube algorithm used to always his videos into my feed and I don't ever think I watched more that a few minutes of one as he always seemed too autistic for my tastes.

Now that he's LARPing as a woman I'm surprised YouTube doesn't have him as every second video on my main page.
 
I don't see Jim as having a solid sexuality. Just as someone who needs attention from any source. I honestly buy him as base bisexual since he may lust over women but as Mr. Mint pointed out he's been bicurious in the past but couldn't express it due to already having a wife then but who knows.

His main sexuality is ego stroking, followed by attention, agp, and whatever is at the core of his sexuality, straight or bi.
I think you're dead on with your assessment, except for him being bisexual. I think he's whatever the emotional validation equivalent of 'gay for pay' would be. I don't buy for a minute he's actually attracted to men because whenever he talks about how gay he is it comes across extremely insincere and performative; like girls who pretend to be lesbian to rebel against their parents.

That's not to say Jim wouldn't get it on with dudes though. Unlike the coward Kevin Gibes, I have no doubt Jim would and has jumped at any opportunity for relations with anyone willing, but I think it's purely to sate his need to be wanted, rather than out of any actual genuine attraction or physical desires.
 
This might be an extremely stupid idea but funny enough I think Jim Sterling could have had a better career if he pursued something like Marketing or Business- or even being a Fraud Analyst- considering the fact the videos he produces on the "shady business" aspects of the Video Game Industry and admittedly very well-researched- especially due to the fact that alot of the business models propped up by companies like EA in regards to loot-boxes is somewhat experimental due to the fact it blurs the legal "line in the sand" between Gambling and Entertainment.
 
I think you're dead on with your assessment, except for him being bisexual. I think he's whatever the emotional validation equivalent of 'gay for pay' would be. I don't buy for a minute he's actually attracted to men because whenever he talks about how gay he is it comes across extremely insincere and performative; like girls who pretend to be lesbian to rebel against their parents.

That's not to say Jim wouldn't get it on with dudes though. Unlike the coward Kevin Gibes, I have no doubt Jim would and has jumped at any opportunity for relations with anyone willing, but I think it's purely to sate his need to be wanted, rather than out of any actual genuine attraction or physical desires.
I think it goes deeper than just faking his attraction to dick, but also his kinks.

There's a term in certain kink circles "attention sub". Jim fits the type. He displays a bunch of submissive kinks in hopes of getting attention from doms. I doubt he really had them to start before he Stockholm'd himself into them. It's a common phenomenon, and they are generally avoided because they make very dangerous partners. Likely to never speak up if things go too far or they hide injuries that need attention just so as to prolong things to get more attention. They are safety hazards. Most doms don't want to harm (hurt yes, but not harm) their subs, even on accident, the thought is mortifying for them, but attention subs often don't speak up, afraid they will stop getting attention and so will let things go too far.

Afterwards during aftercare it gets revealed the line was crossed, and the attention seeking sub said nothing. This violates trust and often leaves the dom quite upset, as anyone would be if they found out they harmed someone unintentionally.
This might be an extremely stupid idea but funny enough I think Jim Sterling could have had a better career if he pursued something like Marketing or Business- or even being a Fraud Analyst- considering the fact the videos he produces on the "shady business" aspects of the Video Game Industry and admittedly very well-researched- especially due to the fact that alot of the business models propped up by companies like EA in regards to loot-boxes is somewhat experimental due to the fact it blurs the legal "line in the sand" between Gambling and Entertainment.
He's incredibly surface level. Having read the research papers on how exploit the human psyche for lootbox sales, Jim doesn't even begin to realize how awful it is. Jim doesn't research that much, he could go deeper, but he doesn't. He's lazy and doing more would take work.
 
Next time Jim brings up how the UK is literally genociding trans people in the streets, point him to this thread, which he can't ignore as they're trying and failing to virtue signal.


0 killed in the UK in the last 3 years. According to that, 375 trans people were killed worldwide last year, against a total rate of around 464,000


So roughly 0.08%. I'm surprised he even leaves the house. Oh wait, he doesn't.
I wish
 
This might be an extremely stupid idea but funny enough I think Jim Sterling could have had a better career if he pursued something like Marketing or Business- or even being a Fraud Analyst- considering the fact the videos he produces on the "shady business" aspects of the Video Game Industry and admittedly very well-researched- especially due to the fact that alot of the business models propped up by companies like EA in regards to loot-boxes is somewhat experimental due to the fact it blurs the legal "line in the sand" between Gambling and Entertainment.
Jim's 'research' is reading the first paragraph of a Kotaku article on whatever he wants to be angry about this week, maybe skimming the wiki, and then filling the gaps with hot takes and cherry-picked 'evidence' from his Twitter echo chamber.

He puts more effort into looking like a woman than he does into any topic he covers for the JQ, and that is absolutely not a compliment.
 
Next time Jim brings up how the UK is literally genociding trans people in the streets, point him to this thread, which he can't ignore as they're trying and failing to virtue signal.


0 killed in the UK in the last 3 years. According to that, 375 trans people were killed worldwide last year, against a total rate of around 464,000


So roughly 0.08%. I'm surprised he even leaves the house. Oh wait, he doesn't.
Ah but you're using the stats of bigotted police who are at the forefront of the transgender genocide! Clearly this data is fake and you're just another alt-right transphobe boomer who wants to cover up how literally hundreds, maybe even thousands and possibly millions of transpeople are being cut down in the street every year.
 
That's not to say Jim wouldn't get it on with dudes though. Unlike the coward Kevin Gibes, I have no doubt Jim would and has jumped at any opportunity for relations with anyone willing, but I think it's purely to sate his need to be wanted, rather than out of any actual genuine attraction or physical desires.
Yes, he does remind me of that "only gay in the village" from Little Brittain, and somehow manages to look worse, by comparison. And the one from Little Brittain is supposed to be a parody.
 
Next time Jim brings up how the UK is literally genociding trans people in the streets, point him to this thread, which he can't ignore as they're trying and failing to virtue signal.


0 killed in the UK in the last 3 years. According to that, 375 trans people were killed worldwide last year, against a total rate of around 464,000


So roughly 0.08%. I'm surprised he even leaves the house. Oh wait, he doesn't.
His feelings do not care about your facts. The police are probably lying anyway.


I think with Jim and bringing up he is trans, it is not so much as he talks about it too much, and he does, but he goes off into too many tangents. Now the Jimquisition was always Jim's soapbox but he used to do a far better job of staying on topic.

When I watch a video about lootboxes I want to hear about what is going on with them, not get a lecture on the evils of capitalism. His eye goes off the ball.

Now you can talk about how Capitalism plays a part in allowing businesses to get so exploitative with the lootboxes but he changes the topic to ranting about Capitalism and lootboxes just becomes the example of how bad Capitalism is.

See where am I getting here? He changes the focus of his videos too much off of the advertised topic. He does this with bringing in trans issues as well. You can bring it in, but you need to connect it the advertised topic and not allow it to take focus away from the subject matter at hand.

Then there is him shoehorning in the wrestling crap.
 
Back