Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I said all this earlier in the thread and I'll say it again here:

  • This entire thing was made about race, despite the fact that everyone involved was white, and ZERO evidence was ever brought up that would indicate Kyle is a white supremacist, except for the fact that he's a right winger, which automatically makes him the devil. But trust me, if they found ANYTHING that would paint Kyle as a racist, the media would have never let you forget it.
  • All the information that came up in the trial that CNN said was new information that came to light or TYT said made them have to post a correction has literally been available almost since the day of the incident. The footage was there. The information was there. Virtually nothing new that I can think of came up in the trial. It was all there. If more people stopped getting their news from the damn headlines (forget the fact that the articles are coming from shit sources. I truly believe people just read the headlines and form an opinion) then nobody would honestly think that Kyle was Guilty.
  • If this was a BLM Activist / ANTIFA member and he did this to MAGA Trump supporters with all the same circumstances applying, do you really think he would have been this heavily scrutinized by the media or even put before a judge and jury? I have my doubts. Fuck, he probably would have gotten the Presidential Medal of Honor shortly after Biden was sworn in. Had the situation been a reverse, I have no doubt there would have been some MAGA-tards trying to make the shooter out to be a mad man, but they wouldn't have had the media, celebs, or the government screaming it from on high and trying to push it as the truth.

Basically, fuck these people. They were wrong, and their really bad takes were either willfully ignorant at best or downright malicious at worst. I hope Kyle has made a list and checked it twice for all the people and organizations that are going to get sued.
 
Another rally in Kenosha by niggers and workers against "fascism" whatever the fuck that means at this point.

Fuck.

The crowd seems thin though.
Don't know if this was posted yet.View attachment 2738765
I remember a prosecutor that went after the mob always sat with his back against a wall. Just thinking Rittenhouse may want to adopt that policy.
The left losing the plot again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
47 comes back to Kenosha to wrap up some loose ends.
Rittenhouse Trial 25.png
 
I stumbled across this as I was organizing one of my unsorted archive folders. Obviously less relevant now, but it's a decent one to put in your folders.

View attachment 2738717
"The Truth in Eleven Minutes"
This right here is worth preserving. Multiple camera angles, timeline of Kyle as he runs down the street, the fear and violence in Kenosha that night. Good stuff.
 
More rando salt from insane Twitter folks.


View attachment 2738928

This is one of the dumbest talking points in the history of bullshit, possibly ever:

"Always put property above human life 😭"

It's a total lie in the context of Kyle, as they know. He used force to defend his life, not property. But there's nothing wrong with defending property either. People work hard to create or own things, and they have a right to protect them.

If somebody wants to burn you out of your livelihood or your home, they deserve everything that's coming to them. The alternative is living in some kind of gay Mad Max dystopia where cities go up in flames every time pedophiles claim to be angry about police brutality. Even a dog knows to defend its own property.
 
This is one of the dumbest talking points in the history of bullshit, possibly ever:

"Always put property above human life 😭"

It's a total lie in the context of Kyle, as they know. He used force to defend his life, not property. But there's nothing wrong with defending property either. People work hard to create or own things, and they have a right to protect them.

If somebody wants to burn you out of your livelihood or your home, they deserve everything that's coming to them. The alternative is living in some kind of gay Mad Max dystopia where cities go up in flames every time pedophiles claim to be angry about police brutality. Even a dog knows to defend its own property.
Plus the fact that Kyle and his friends / associates actually defended the property of people of color. A thing those leftist nutjobs conveniently leave out. Or the fact that the BLM/Antifa fascists actually rioted / burned down a community of mostly poor minorities. Fucking idiots.
 
Plus the fact that Kyle and his friends / associates actually defended the property of people of color. A thing those leftist nutjobs conveniently leave out. Or the fact that the BLM/Antifa fascists actually rioted / burned down a community of mostly poor minorities. Fucking idiots.
He's also part latino lol. He just looks really pasty.
 

I wish Purple Sun Goddess could please explain to me how Kyle is a white supremacist. I have seen no evidence to indicate that he is, and all these people can point to is that he's right wing, and all of them are automatically racist. Just because you hate someone, that doesnt make them racist.

Also, LOL at "White men don't get to decide what is and what isn't racist". Oh really? Because I've seen a whole shit load of them on the left in just the last 5-6 years that have made it their whole life's mission, including Sean King!
 
They don't want them, but want and need are two separate things. The ability to threaten riots, to in a broader sense use intimidation to get what they want is their most powerful tactic.

Give us the right verdict, or we will riot.
Give us the policy we want, or we will attack you.
Suck the girl dick, transphobe, or we will beat you.

It is everywhere if you consider it.

And with this verdict, their golem which enforces this intimidation now realizes it is vulnerable, that it can be hurt, that its members can be killed. And the person who did it will face no consequences. What is worse beyond that, now everyone they'd intimidate -sees the same thing-.

If they do not make good the threat, it utterly destroys their ability to intimidate. The threat was made, the bluff was called, and if they do not make it a reality the single most powerful, most omnipresent tactic of the Left is utterly, irreparably damaged.

This has always made me wonder: At what point did the establishment dems abandon the entire concept of consent of the governed? Yes, you can argue that the shitbirds at the top absolutely never believed in that, but I worked with enough people in my heyday that I know a ton of rank-and-file considered those concepts sacrosanct, and you'd assume some of that would translate into moral fiber at somepoint up the chain.

I harbor this notion that when the Left's more intelligent voices retired, or, more often, died, the people who replaced them were not their equals, but vastly less experienced, vastly less intelligent underlings who had been thoroughly indoctrinated in ways the previous generation couldn't even begin to understand. The old left could do some idiotic bullshit, but the rank-and-file at least believed they had a moral obligation to leave things better than how you found them. The new left is nothing like this: They don't actually give a hot fuck about anything they claim to care about: they want the good boy points for the performance. Nothing else matters.

"I believe rightthink, I'm on right side of history, praise me. I am good boy."

We fucking made fun of the neocons for that kind of idiocy, so it shouldn't surprise you when I tell you that oldschool dems were drummed from the party for making fun of these assclowns over shit like this.

Just think of how many people, here on the Farms alone, have told you some story of when they went separate ways from the party line and never looked back, or how many had family members who turned themselves mentally unrecognizable courtesy of this crap. It's kind of terrifying, in its own stupid way.
 
"As a white man he doesn't get to decide what's racist or not"

Okay, let's run with that. Who decides? What if two nonwhites disagree over a potentially racist word or action? Who decides then? From where do they derive authority on the matter?

Racism is a purely subjective system of measurement. I don't adhere to purely subjective systems of measurements which are used to bludgeon political opponents and elevate soapbox screamers' social status and bank accounts.

The reaction to the verdict demonstrates this concept beautifully, and how vicious these racebaiting liars are.
 
Rosenbaum - 5:00 - Reaching for the barrel of Kyle's gun because he thought he was someone else who had put out one of his fires (3:36)
Jump-Kick Man - 7:15 - Kyle fell to the ground and this was the first person to attack him.
Huber - 7:26 - Kyle is on the ground, attacked by a skateboard and tries to grab the rifle.
Grosskreutz - 7:40 - Advancing on Kyle and reached for a handgun but only wounded. This statement was brought up in court.
Unknown hands up person - 8:12 - Kyle has the guy in sight but isn't firing because said protester is backing off.
You take a look at the video, be in the situation he was in and then tell me it wasn't self-defense. It was. If Kyle had shot jump-kick man, he probably would still get off simply because he was attacked first.
 
Last edited:
This is one of the dumbest talking points in the history of bullshit, possibly ever:

"Always put property above human life 😭"

It's a total lie in the context of Kyle, as they know. He used force to defend his life, not property. But there's nothing wrong with defending property either. People work hard to create or own things, and they have a right to protect them.

If somebody wants to burn you out of your livelihood or your home, they deserve everything that's coming to them. The alternative is living in some kind of gay Mad Max dystopia where cities go up in flames every time pedophiles claim to be angry about police brutality. Even a dog knows to defend its own property.
They know it's a lie because they support things like the French revolution and riots over material disparity between the classes, its a slimy tactic to try and appeal to Christian ethic when even christ commented on material disparity in things like how much people give to charity or about how it was ok to eat priest only bread to survive
 
1637533818442.png
1637533847241.png


1637533870273.png
1637533894379.png


1637533917381.png
1637533945327.png


DURRR KYLE IS NOT JUDGE JURY OR EXECUTIONER
Yet the unhinged twitterfags are playing judge, jury, and executioner
1637529615051-png.2738927
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back