- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh shit sanctions if further motions are filed in bad faith? Kinda weird that was directed at both parties but that's gotta be making Mel go apeshit.ORDER denying Motion for Reconsideration Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones
Judge Jones probably wishes to remain beyond any suspicion of bias against one side.Oh shit sanctions if further motions are filed in bad faith? Kinda weird that was directed at both parties but that's gotta be making Mel go apeshit.
I wouldn't think that'd countJudge Jones probably wishes to remain beyond any suspicion of bias against one side.
Just the account, or her IP address? I can see her creating an alt account and coming back to pick another fight.After some deliberation I've banned Melinda. I will be setting up a poll about what to do with the thread.
Then I'll nuke that.Just the account, or her IP address? I can see her creating an alt account and coming back to pick another fight.
Oh shit sanctions if further motions are filed in bad faith? Kinda weird that was directed at both parties but that's gotta be making Mel go apeshit.
I disagree. I'd bet he's actually pretty frustrated with both sides in this case, regardless of the obvious lack of merit in Melinda's claims. It's self-explanatory why Melinda's filings would piss off the court. However, instead of accepting the magistrate's order for a minor redaction, Hardin filed an objection that the court had to read (and most certainly would rather not). This is after filing dozens of pages of classical Greek homages and exhibits that mostly boil down to Melinda schizoposting about Jewish supremacy and Marshall's dong. All of this makes sense to us, but Judge Jones (an 81-year-old man in semi-retirement) is likely just seeing a white-trash feud monopolizing court time with hundreds of pages of filings.Judge Jones probably wishes to remain beyond any suspicion of bias against one side.
It's a "Fucking knock it off you two," order.ORDER denying Motion for Reconsideration Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones
Jesus, the judge's earlier filing sounded much like "oh will each and every one of you just shut the fuck up and get out of my sight", and she decides to pour more paper on their desk? She must be hell-bent on making sure everyone hates her guts.PRO SE MOTION for Order to Show Cause by Melinda Scott.
PRO SE Response re MOTION for Reconsideration
PRO SE MOTION for Injunction by Melinda Scott.
In her defense this was likely put in mail before the judge's order.Jesus, the judge's earlier filing sounded much like "oh will each and every one of you just shut the fuck up and get out of my sight", and she decides to pour more paper on their desk? She must be hell-bent on making sure everyone hates her guts.
True, didn't cross my mind when I wrote that post - still, wouldn't want to be involved in any of this mess. Going to pour out one for our nigga Null tonight.In her defense this was likely put in mail before the judge's order.
Most of Hardin's filings are in response to Melinda's filings. Lack of response already caused some problems for Null so I would assume it's reasonable that he responds.However, instead of accepting the magistrate's order for a minor redaction, Hardin filed an objection that the court had to read (and most certainly would rather not)
It was just one reference - not sure how appropriate that was but certainly made it more entertaining to read than dry legal language. And submitting the posts is not without merit when they contradict statements she made in her filings.This is after filing dozens of pages of classical Greek homages and exhibits that mostly boil down to Melinda schizoposting about Jewish supremacy and Marshall's dong.
Melinda's proof that I am Hardin:PRO SE MOTION for Order to Show Cause by Melinda Scott.
PRO SE Response re MOTION for Reconsideration
PRO SE MOTION for Injunction by Melinda Scott.
I am apparently an exhibit in this mess (multiple times. She seems really upset that I post docs here as well as my pointing out where you can get unredacted version of the exhibits (legally) ). @talk talk talk , @TheSockiestSock, @DSP's Tax Lawyer , @ConSluttant are all exhibits too
View attachment 2741235
View attachment 2741236
View attachment 2741237
View attachment 2741238
View attachment 2741239
View attachment 2741240
View attachment 2741241
View attachment 2741242
View attachment 2741243
View attachment 2741244
View attachment 2741245
View attachment 2741247
View attachment 2741248
View attachment 2741249
View attachment 2741250
View attachment 2741251
View attachment 2741252
View attachment 2741253
View attachment 2741254
View attachment 2741255
View attachment 2741257
View attachment 2741258
View attachment 2741259
EDIT: Hardin uploaded a doc to the appellate court
I can't tell if she's doing this on purpose or not but it hurts.doxx
I'll be Hardin for you, baby~Admit it, admit the terrible truth of your real identity!
She's not, I'd guessI can't tell if she's doing this on purpose or not but it hurts.
What's wrong with using protonmail? I use it for business since they don't have bots reading your emails like Google has with GMail and have actual security features. I guess I'm also Hardin.Melinda's proof that I am Hardin:
View attachment 2741366
Amazing. Completely insane, of course, but amazing nonetheless.
Btw, I completely deny any attempts on my part to "circumvent the court's order" (which only applied to Hardin), and I completely deny "post[ing] an unredacted copy...on November 16th" (considering I did not post that document on November 16th). Needless to say, I am not Hardin either, despite Mel's delusions.