Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

ORDER denying Motion for Reconsideration Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones

image-000001.png
image-000002.png
 

Attachments

After some deliberation I've banned Melinda. I will be setting up a poll about what to do with the thread.
Just the account, or her IP address? I can see her creating an alt account and coming back to pick another fight.
 
Oh shit sanctions if further motions are filed in bad faith? Kinda weird that was directed at both parties but that's gotta be making Mel go apeshit.

Judge Jones probably wishes to remain beyond any suspicion of bias against one side.
I disagree. I'd bet he's actually pretty frustrated with both sides in this case, regardless of the obvious lack of merit in Melinda's claims. It's self-explanatory why Melinda's filings would piss off the court. However, instead of accepting the magistrate's order for a minor redaction, Hardin filed an objection that the court had to read (and most certainly would rather not). This is after filing dozens of pages of classical Greek homages and exhibits that mostly boil down to Melinda schizoposting about Jewish supremacy and Marshall's dong. All of this makes sense to us, but Judge Jones (an 81-year-old man in semi-retirement) is likely just seeing a white-trash feud monopolizing court time with hundreds of pages of filings.

There's plenty of reasons that >90% of cases settle before going to trial: a big one is that lawyers know that judges want litigants to fuck off.

A nice quote: "The best way to improve as a lawyer is to remember this: every single person that reads what you write (whether a supervising partner, the opposing counsel, the client, or a judge) hates you and resents every word that you make them read. Don't make them read more than is absolutely necessary."
 
PRO SE MOTION for Order to Show Cause by Melinda Scott.

PRO SE Response re MOTION for Reconsideration

PRO SE MOTION for Injunction by Melinda Scott.

I am apparently an exhibit in this mess (multiple times. She seems really upset that I post docs here as well as my pointing out where you can get unredacted version of the exhibits (legally) ). @talk talk talk , @TheSockiestSock, @DSP's Tax Lawyer , @ConSluttant are all exhibits too

image-000001.png
image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png
image-000005.png
image-000006.png
image-000007.png
image-000001.png
image-000001.png
image-000001.png
image-000001.png
image-000001.png
image-000001.png
image-000001.png
image-000001.png
image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png
image-000005.png
image-000001.png
image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png


EDIT: Hardin uploaded a doc to the appellate court

image-000001.png
image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png
 

Attachments

Last edited:
PRO SE MOTION for Order to Show Cause by Melinda Scott.

PRO SE Response re MOTION for Reconsideration

PRO SE MOTION for Injunction by Melinda Scott.
Jesus, the judge's earlier filing sounded much like "oh will each and every one of you just shut the fuck up and get out of my sight", and she decides to pour more paper on their desk? She must be hell-bent on making sure everyone hates her guts.
 
Jesus, the judge's earlier filing sounded much like "oh will each and every one of you just shut the fuck up and get out of my sight", and she decides to pour more paper on their desk? She must be hell-bent on making sure everyone hates her guts.
In her defense this was likely put in mail before the judge's order.
 
However, instead of accepting the magistrate's order for a minor redaction, Hardin filed an objection that the court had to read (and most certainly would rather not)
Most of Hardin's filings are in response to Melinda's filings. Lack of response already caused some problems for Null so I would assume it's reasonable that he responds.

This is after filing dozens of pages of classical Greek homages and exhibits that mostly boil down to Melinda schizoposting about Jewish supremacy and Marshall's dong.
It was just one reference - not sure how appropriate that was but certainly made it more entertaining to read than dry legal language. And submitting the posts is not without merit when they contradict statements she made in her filings.
 
PRO SE MOTION for Order to Show Cause by Melinda Scott.

PRO SE Response re MOTION for Reconsideration

PRO SE MOTION for Injunction by Melinda Scott.

I am apparently an exhibit in this mess (multiple times. She seems really upset that I post docs here as well as my pointing out where you can get unredacted version of the exhibits (legally) ). @talk talk talk , @TheSockiestSock, @DSP's Tax Lawyer , @ConSluttant are all exhibits too



EDIT: Hardin uploaded a doc to the appellate court

Melinda's proof that I am Hardin:
Screenshot 2021-11-22 181531.png

Amazing. Completely insane, of course, but amazing nonetheless.

Btw, I completely deny any attempts on my part to "circumvent the court's order" (which only applied to Hardin), and I completely deny "post[ing] an unredacted copy...on November 16th" (considering I did not post that document on November 16th). Needless to say, I am not Hardin either, despite Mel's delusions.
 
Melinda's proof that I am Hardin:
View attachment 2741366

Amazing. Completely insane, of course, but amazing nonetheless.

Btw, I completely deny any attempts on my part to "circumvent the court's order" (which only applied to Hardin), and I completely deny "post[ing] an unredacted copy...on November 16th" (considering I did not post that document on November 16th). Needless to say, I am not Hardin either, despite Mel's delusions.
What's wrong with using protonmail? I use it for business since they don't have bots reading your emails like Google has with GMail and have actual security features. I guess I'm also Hardin.
 
Back