Waukesha, WI, Parade Vehicle Attack - Suspect is Darrell Edward Brooks, currently in custody.

Who's responsible?

  • Glowies

    Votes: 196 9.4%
  • Incel

    Votes: 57 2.7%
  • Truck of Peace

    Votes: 222 10.6%
  • BLM

    Votes: 708 34.0%
  • Retaliation for Kyle's Acquittal

    Votes: 539 25.9%
  • Minceraft

    Votes: 128 6.1%
  • Alt-Right Nazi Gamergater Chud

    Votes: 108 5.2%
  • Other (please specify)

    Votes: 127 6.1%

  • Total voters
    2,085
"... They say that there's some belief that this wasn't intentional, that he didn't mean to hit some of these people, because when you look at the video, it seems like he avoided a number of people."

The guy drove down a massive street with numerous intersections along the way. If he wanted to avoid running over people, he had numerous options to choose from. The fact that he did not is pretty telling.

The sheer faggotry of this media slimeball makes me pretty MATI.
If this guy has taught us anything, it's that the media has turned themselves into the enemy of the people with shit like that.

Don't consume media 24/7 lest you end up like some lunatic.
 
What do you mean "we", white man?

The entire concept of racial identity (i.e. I should treat randos different from other randos because I share skin color) is trash. I call niggers, niggers because of behavior, not skin color.

They have a fair argument that it's because of white supremacy that they got that designation. It's still on them that they chose to keep it.
 
Fair enough, but you can still make at least some guesses based on experience. When a jogger runs a bunch of people over, it's usually because they've just committed an unrelated crime and don't care who they hit. When a person fresh off the boat from the middle east does, it's STILL usually not terrorism but there's a much higher chance of it.

In fact I'd argue that, when you don't count elderly fucks who shouldn't have licenses, white people are more likely to use cars as tools of terrorism than black people.
I don't care if people want to speculate, "what if" is why we have computers and websites.
"It must be X" when people have no way of knowing is just spastic and extremely damaging to society.
 
To be honest, I don’t understand how the “fleeing from a crime” narrative is somehow better in anyone’s eyes.

I mean, I don't know about you guys, but I'd say being out on bail for two whole days before stabbing someone, fleeing the scene, and then driving straight down a parade route ramming into children and the elderly is pretty much right up there with intentional terrorism via Truck of Peace in terms of being a menace to society.
It's ass-covering for their stochastic terrorism.
 
And there's a bit more about the SOB DA.

Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm bragged about eliminating cash bail in the county, a policy decision many have criticized following revelations surrounding the criminal history of arrested Waukesha suspect Darrell E. Brooks.

Brooks had been released from the Milwaukee County Jail just two days before the ramming attack at a Christmas parade. The career criminal is already facing charges of being in possession of a weapon as a convicted felon, already possessing felony sex crimes, strangulation, assault and drug convictions.

Brooks had proved capable of leaving jail with little more than a $1,000 bond, an astonishingly low price for a career criminal with plethora of violent convictions.
 
The only thing we'll see in the press about this is how Wisconsin needs to make it illegal for the police to chase fleeing criminals.

They'll stand on the bodies of these people and say "If the cops didn't chase him, he wouldn't have ran over the crowd!"

Otherwise, the MSM will bury this shit as deep as they can.
And there is zero evidence so far that he was being pursued at all. I think the "fleeing the scene of a crime" language is intentionally misleading to make you think he was being chased and panicked.
 
Among those hurt were members of the Milwaukee Dancing Grannies -

f21478e1d8b89d588f181af4a274333ee38705c1.avif
This motherfucker, I swear to God.

What did those women ever do anybody to deserve that?
 
What do you mean by hot? As in chambered? What in the hell is the point of carrying it unchambered? If you are going to carry, always do it with the gun ready to be fired as you draw it. It's not an emotional support object, you are carrying it for worst case scenario.
You'd be surprised how many people think they have time to rack it first.

After what almost 5 years of Charlottesville obsession and "angry white men" hatred, we can't let the media just memory hole this.
It would be an even further sickening disservice to those poor souls lost forever and their families.
 
Also if he was doing this for terror related motives, he’d be screaming about it. Most terrorists aren’t very smart and want to send a message with their actions. This dude isn’t some 300 IQ giganigga, he’s just a complete fucktard sociopath.
Yes, with terrorism there would be a manifesto, he would be a member of an extremist group, this would have had some level of premeditation. So far, none of that. Sperging out about people not wanting to instantly label it terrorism when there is zero evidence of it is just as retarded as instantly labeling it terrorism.
 
Short of putting up concrete bollards, or covering every single possible entry way with a cop car, you’re not stopping shit. Putting up temporary guardrail stuff requires a lot of time and money, for a 2 or 3 hour event. Putting cop cars everywhere takes less time but also requires more cars, which can’t be elsewhere. They might also not have enough cars. And why the hell are you assuming there’s going to be some crazy guy targeting a parade in a town in Wisconsin? Security plans take into account likely risk, and that likely wasn’t a high risk at all.
Rittenhouse got acquitted Friday, there was always a chance of something like this happening. The Nice Truck attack happened years ago, you can make contingency plans. Having cop cars parked at all the entranceways (there were cops already standing by the barricades with the car right there) and having them with rifles would’ve potentially stopped this. Pistols won’t do shit against a speeding vehicle you aren’t expecting.
 
Yes, with terrorism there would be a manifesto, he would be a member of an extremist group, this would have had some level of premeditation. So far, none of that. Sperging out about people not wanting to instantly label it terrorism when there is zero evidence of it is just as exceptional as instantly labeling it terrorism.

You’re no fun
 
Yes, with terrorism there would be a manifesto, he would be a member of an extremist group, this would have had some level of premeditation. So far, none of that. Sperging out about people not wanting to instantly label it terrorism when there is zero evidence of it is just as exceptional as instantly labeling it terrorism.

On the other hand, this nigga wasn't fleeing, he was actively swerving into people.

Seems intentional, imo. And the only reason for that would primarily be political.
 
Yes, with terrorism there would be a manifesto, he would be a member of an extremist group, this would have had some level of premeditation. So far, none of that. Sperging out about people not wanting to instantly label it terrorism when there is zero evidence of it is just as exceptional as instantly labeling it terrorism.


I actually disagree. This seems like an impulsive reaction to the Rittenhouse trial, usually the big terrorist acts that have manifestos are calm, cold, and calculated and are planned weeks/months in advance. Those people aren't acting in an emotional response. This happened two days after Kyle was acquitted and the driver was openly talking about how angry he was about it on Facebook.

Plus, you know... nigger. Not exactly known for their outstanding abilities to read or write.
 
And there is zero evidence so far that he was being pursued at all. I think the "fleeing the scene of a crime" language is intentionally misleading to make you think he was being chased and panicked.

You don’t have to be followed to be fleeing the scene of a crime.
And there wasn't any fleeing the scene claim until well after he drove through the parade.
 
Never waste an opportunity to blame things on Trump
View attachment 2741770View attachment 2741772View attachment 2741773
Also, Trump’s criminal justice reform was in reference to non-violent crime, but those are inconvenient facts for this guy
The dude was being held for non-violent crime. disregard, I suck cocks -- the news reported he was out on a RECKLESS DRIVING charge, not RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT and resisting This whole distinction between violent and non-violent chronic offenders is BS, anyway. It's the same way they claim X percent of the prison population is there for non-violent drug crimes.

Chronic offenders are chronic offenders. Gaige Grosskreutz had simple (extreme) DUIs before he pointed a gun at a kid during a riot. These behaviors are all part and parcel of an anti-social personality disorder and they need to be treated as the dangerous individuals they are.
 
Last edited:
Back