Waukesha, WI, Parade Vehicle Attack - Suspect is Darrell Edward Brooks, currently in custody.

Who's responsible?

  • Glowies

    Votes: 196 9.4%
  • Incel

    Votes: 57 2.7%
  • Truck of Peace

    Votes: 222 10.6%
  • BLM

    Votes: 708 34.0%
  • Retaliation for Kyle's Acquittal

    Votes: 539 25.9%
  • Minceraft

    Votes: 128 6.1%
  • Alt-Right Nazi Gamergater Chud

    Votes: 108 5.2%
  • Other (please specify)

    Votes: 127 6.1%

  • Total voters
    2,085
This makes sense.



But it's good political strategy to spin it, just to expose some hypocrisy. Not of blacks in general but of a certain clique of the MSM.

I'm so glad that Rittenhouse didn't shoot 3 blacks... Their desperation to turn it into a racial thing exposed them and this will rip their underwear from them.
What about if your plan is to deny this piece of shit agency in a really extremely crude way and force them to go "nononono, he smart. he was forced to do it because of his total lack of moral decency and respect for the value of life which was caused by whitey somehow."

I fully adopted this position last night when people were glowing fucking hard. Don't play their game by going to the predictable opposite position. Lean in. Make them die on this hill (figuratively). I'm already up here. It's been fun. This sociopath POS killed grammas and crippled children because his lifestyle and culture demanded it. Rather than overcome these adversities he was compelled to run over people with a car because of how mentally crippled, socially dysfunctional, and morally bankrupt he is as a person.

Considering how BLM et. al. blow kisses towards antisocial shitbags being awful, it is the worst kind of lose-lose situation for them.

Any decent moral person would push back and denounce this guy and be done with it. Burn in Hell, fucker. But they can't. He must be perpetually an oppressed victim who did no wrong. They must do the mental gymnastics. IDGAF because I don't subscribe to their bullshit IdPol ideology and so I make sure to fuck up the landing. Like I said, it's been fun.
 
Here's one part that you missed:



Not a random act of violence, that was methodically planned out down to the date, location and purpose. Eight people dead because of that POS. There are levels of evil. One key fact about this compared to Brooks was that his was planned. Whether that's "better" or "worse," what have you. People still suffered because of his ideology. Thank God he's serving life in prison.

I would like the same fate to be met with Brooks.
That's was always up for debate, he didn't tell anyone about his grand plan to strike at the heart of the Zionist infidels in NYC. Not a single person. The consensus among law enforcement is he was just bragging about having a sandnigger moment. Compare him to Ramzi Yousef or his uncle Khalid Sheikh Mohammed; not only are they not on the same level (not even close), they would have laughed him out of Al Qaeda if he had shown up before dispatching him to hell.
 
Okay, im understanding your position clearer..(partly due to me being fixated on it being a Hate crime) you're caught up on "planning" angle correct? If so then please elaborate on how Fields planned to drive a car into a crowd and kill a nonblack fauxcommunist?
Charlottesville was brewing with tension between White supremacists and protestors in a tight space. Do remember that White men surrounded people with tiki torches to incite fear. Over statues.

Shit was bound to kick off. Fields was one to light the fire by plowing through a street of protestors and able to leave with no consequences THAT day because the city handled it all poorly.

Now, contrast that with this parade. The parade was planned and handled by the city. A peaceful event to celebrate the holidays. Now, what we KNOW currently, Brooks came out of nowhere plowing several people during this parade. The city handled this promptly hours after that event.

I'm hesitant to call THIS terrorism at this point in time as there's not enough evidence to say that Brooks intended this as a medicated attack based on politics. Now, a hate crime, I agree with based on his Facebook. I know it sounds like I'm contradicting myself, but the aspect I'm looking for to 100% agree without a doubt of this being "terrorism" is it being planned and premeditated.

As many people here pointed out, this appears to be yet another case of sadistic violence by a low life criminal who happens to be a racist rapist with a rap sheet older than me. Think about it, based on what you've seen about him: you think he's intelligent enough to PLAN anything of that magnitude beyond his typical method of crime?

And I cannot stress this enough: THIS IS NOT TO UNDERMINE OR DOWNPLAY THE HORRIFIC EVENTS I'VE AND MANY OTHERS WITNESSED THAT DAY. It's merely an argument of semantics at this point of time.
 
Anecdotally, between this, CRT, the media lying through their teeth about Rittenhouse, and a whole bunch of other shit, I've seen a ton of people float towards the right. Hell, powerlevel, but myself included. A little over a year ago I was canvassing for Sanders and now I want absolutely nothing to do with the left, even despite considering myself more economically left.
Same, never thought I'd morph into someone like Christopher Lasch in the last two years.
 
Daily Beast article downplaying the BLM connection. They have an axe to grind against Andy for reporting on this and other Antifa thugs.
Not much out right now, Americans are sleeping and most of the footage from the parade is already posted.
You gotta love how journos do these hit pieces: always in the opinion column, so they can limit their responsibility. The fact that it is an opinion piece is easily missed by the reader, and someone's opinion doesn't need a basis in truth.
 
That's was always up for debate, he didn't tell anyone about his grand plan to strike at the heart of the Zionist infidels in NYC. Not a single person.
Why is that "up for debate" when what I quoted has his admission of that act of terrorism?

Hell, why is THIS up for debate right when the bodies are still cold?

All the information this thread has complied about this guy right down to his criminal history, social media presence, attributes as a "person", angles of said event before and during, many people here, yourself included are accepting a spin of this being "terrorism." While it's plausible that it can be considered terrorism, that's up to the prosecutors to officially decide.

There are criminals with a high IQ and there are those with a low IQ but in the end they are all criminal scum. Intelligence is really not a factor in crime.
None of us are denying that he's a criminal and POS for what happened during that parade. Again, that's why information has been provided of his lengthy criminal history while the media conveniently ignores it.
 
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury,
We have heard a whole lot of fancy words these couple of days, 'stochastic terrorism', 'consequences of firmly held beliefs' and, heh - 'Yakub'.
Experts testified about the 'Anti-white equation' and just what medium and how many words a manifesto must contain to make one a terrorist.
But on this day I appeal to your sense of racism, and conclude that niggas be niggas and it's all a wash. The defense rests."
 
Experts testified about the 'Anti-white equation' and just what medium and how many words a manifesto must contain to make one a terrorist.
If that turns into a meme or copypasta, I'll eat my hat.

226206269_4840314729318616_8632479132140458716_n.jpg
 
Why is that "up for debate" when what I quoted has his admission of that act of terrorism?

Hell, why is THIS up for debate right when the bodies are still cold?

All the information this thread has complied about this guy right down to his criminal history, social media presence, attributes as a "person", angles of said event before and during, many people here, yourself included are accepting a spin of this being "terrorism." While it's plausible that it can be considered terrorism, that's up to the prosecutors to officially decide.


None of us are denying that he's a criminal and POS for what happened during that parade. Again, that's why information has been provided of his lengthy criminal history while the media conveniently ignores it.
It's not a debate as much as it was acknowledged Saipov was a few cards short of a full deck; he likely said that to appear like a bad ass ISIS terrorist as opposed to a loser unemployed truck driver whose own family barely tolerated his ranting and violence. I don't have it handy due to a hosed HD but he underwent several medical and psychiatric exams and it was clear he was a full blown psycho with a touch of schizophrenia, ie delusions of grandeur, rather than the real deal Islamic martyr and ISIS loyalist he claimed to be.

Why are you letting the government define what an act of terrorism is, when it was this very same government that created the conditions that allowed him to roam free as well as the toxic atmosphere that excuses his behavior, in the name of revisionist black history, reparations and black supremacy? I mean, its like you aren't paying attention.
 
Charlottesville was brewing with tension between White supremacists and protestors in a tight space. Do remember that White men surrounded people with tiki torches to incite fear. Over statues.

Shit was bound to kick off. Fields was one to light the fire by plowing through a street of protestors and able to leave with no consequences THAT day because the city handled it all poorly.
Sure, but how exactly is there distinction between planning of these two occurrences?

Did fields wake up 6 weeks prior saying Imma do it or was it too also just a spur of the moment reaction to his car getting surrounded and bashed in?

See this is where the distinction between the two events differ for me. I see one event, 2017 you have two antagonistic groups attacking each other, yeah? One group decided to surround and hit their opposition singled out in a car, he punched the gas and tried to drive away, probably shitting bricks. (Not minimizing his actions at all, he just seems to be the type you know.)

2021 you have two sides, one completely devoid of agitators who are just being evil white devils dancing for their Gods sons birthday, yeah? Then you have a guy they drove a specific route to this specific event, no one chasing him. At any time he could have turned and drove back to Nevada to chase all the underage girls he could dream of but he chose to continue his path, he got to a queue you guys said? That even gives more time to for him contemplate his act, he gets to the barricade, makes the deliberate choice to floor it. Shots open out at the speeding car, still he keeps speeding ignoring the bullets.

Sorry guy, I'm just not seeing your distinction between the two. How is the lesser, legitimate spur of the moment reaction to a mob swarm a terroist act yet this guy who had plenty of time to consider what he was about ot do, encountering how many stop signs, street lights, obstacles and time to contemplate on what action he should take.

As many people here pointed out, this appears to be yet another case of sadistic violence by a low life criminal who happens to be a racist rapist with a rap sheet older than me. Think about it, based on what you've seen about him: you think he's intelligent enough to PLAN anything of that magnitude beyond his typical method of crime?
I worked for Texas Department of Criminal Justice and with that Iearned not to underestimate anyones capabilities. Much less making the folly of underestimating my perceived enemy. He is a career criminal who has managed get one over the system how many times and for how long? Clearly he is intelligent enough to game the system. I do infact think he is intelligent enough to contemplate an act within a span of a drive.
 
Last edited:
Report of an actual combat vet looking after his niece.

Nine News from Aus has an actual journo on the ground. Heh "Warkashaw." That does sound Aus.

Southpark has a promo for a special out on a streaming service that was put up 4 days ago. Red vehicle driven by a dark man going through a crowd.
FE3LXddUUAEANC9.jpg

And MSNBC don't mention race, just that an SUV smashed into the crowd.
 
Why are you letting the government define what an act of terrorism is, when it was this very same government that created the conditions that allowed him to roam free as well as the toxic atmosphere that excuses his behavior, in the name of revisionist black history, reparations and black supremacy? I mean, its like you aren't paying attention.
My lax reaction to whether or not this is considered "terrorism" stems to his already prior criminal history, stunned shock of an event during a time of celebration and inability to be distracted so easily.

As I said before, we're arguing sematics which is a lengthy discussion as proven. Granted, it's better than the "race war" glowing that I've seen lately. I see your supporting argument. I'm just not invested enough in THAT when I already know everything else I need to know about Brooks.

How is the lesser, legitimate spur of the moment reaction to a mob swarm a terroist act yet this guy who had plenty of time to consider what he was about ot do, encountering how many stop signs, street lights, obstacles and time to contemplate on what action he should take.
One, it's a bit of bias from that event. Two, I don't remember much from it.
Why are you letting the government define what an act of terrorism is
In that case, I would be accepting the sentiment that parents against CRT and trans policies in public schooling are considered terrorists and ANTIFA are peaceful protesting.

Disagree with me, sure. Say my logic is flawed, sure. But one thing I'm not is an NPC. I can think for myself despite popular consensus that would dictate me to think based on principles, research, free thought and independent perspective.

Do I think it's terrorism? Admittingly, I've been going back and forth on the fence with that.

1637654887861.jpeg


Now, here's a more pressing matter: could you check my tire pressure before I drive off to the next thread?
 
Okay, im understanding your position clearer..(partly due to me being fixated on it being a Hate crime) but more on terrorism angle: you're caught up on "planning" angle correct? If so then please elaborate on how Fields planned to drive a car into a crowd and kill a nonblack fauxcommunist?
I believe you're talking about Heather Heyers. I'll break my own rule here. In retrospective, I don't care about her and what happened to her that day.

170814-heather-heyer-mother-njs-1031a.jpg


The mother appears to be a redneck fatty.

Charollesville was a clusterfuck.

Hell, I consider the Dallas BLM sniper more of a terrorist than Brooks based on his premedication and planning to outright KILL police officers during a voliate time of political unrest. And I don't use that term lightly. And they share similar beliefs.
 
Back