Waukesha, WI, Parade Vehicle Attack - Suspect is Darrell Edward Brooks, currently in custody.

Who's responsible?

  • Glowies

    Votes: 196 9.4%
  • Incel

    Votes: 57 2.7%
  • Truck of Peace

    Votes: 222 10.6%
  • BLM

    Votes: 708 34.0%
  • Retaliation for Kyle's Acquittal

    Votes: 539 25.9%
  • Minceraft

    Votes: 128 6.1%
  • Alt-Right Nazi Gamergater Chud

    Votes: 108 5.2%
  • Other (please specify)

    Votes: 127 6.1%

  • Total voters
    2,085
Charlottesville was brewing with tension between White supremacists and protestors in a tight space. Do remember that White men surrounded people with tiki torches to incite fear. Over statues.

Shit was bound to kick off. Fields was one to light the fire by plowing through a street of protestors and able to leave with no consequences THAT day because the city handled it all poorly.

Now, contrast that with this parade. The parade was planned and handled by the city. A peaceful event to celebrate the holidays. Now, what we KNOW currently, Brooks came out of nowhere plowing several people during this parade. The city handled this promptly hours after that event.

I'm hesitant to call THIS terrorism at this point in time as there's not enough evidence to say that Brooks intended this as a medicated attack based on politics. Now, a hate crime, I agree with based on his Facebook. I know it sounds like I'm contradicting myself, but the aspect I'm looking for to 100% agree without a doubt of this being "terrorism" is it being planned and premeditated.

As many people here pointed out, this appears to be yet another case of sadistic violence by a low life criminal who happens to be a racist rapist with a rap sheet older than me. Think about it, based on what you've seen about him: you think he's intelligent enough to PLAN anything of that magnitude beyond his typical method of crime?

And I cannot stress this enough: THIS IS NOT TO UNDERMINE OR DOWNPLAY THE HORRIFIC EVENTS I'VE AND MANY OTHERS WITNESSED THAT DAY. It's merely an argument of semantics at this point of time.
iirc didnt those evil whites have permits and those saintly protestors were allowed to take pot shots without the crowd being dispersed followed by the police leading the one group directly into the other and did next to nothing to keep things from popping off and the kid hitting the walking heart attack (not saying she died of one just pointing out she was fat) after getting circled up on then flees in the chaos for his life. not ya know let escape.
 
I'm hesitant to call THIS terrorism at this point in time as there's not enough evidence to say that Brooks intended this as a medicated attack based on politics. Now, a hate crime, I agree with based on his Facebook. I know it sounds like I'm contradicting myself, but the aspect I'm looking for to 100% agree without a doubt of this being "terrorism" is it being planned and premeditated.
Can I use you as a hypothetical? I hope so. I don't sincerely mean any of this. Hypothetical.

So let's say I'm driving down the street in my Ford and I see you on the sidewalk. I scream "NIGGERCUNT BITCH!" and run over you. That's a hate crime. I targeted you out of nowhere based on your race, sex, religion, etc and nothing else.

If I stalk you for months and hang out near your local political party headquarters then scream "JOAN CRAWFORDARIAN PARTY MEMBERS MUST DIE!" then run over you. That's terrorism. I'm now trying to influence the government and policy through terrorizing people.

With this guy's socials he would land in the former, not the latter, category. It can be both. It is as you said just missing the evidence to qualify for the latter at this moment.

If anyone is thinking with the whole Antifa thing why aren't they going after them for the rioting and violence on terrorism charges? That is an extremely good question. I have no fucking clue. They should.
 
It's suspected that the commie cocksucker group known as Redneck Revolt threatened and
scared a Neonazi into plowing into the crowd at Charlottesville.
Radical Liberals tend to brainwash people, and then cause 'incidents' to happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: z0mb0
My lax reaction to whether or not this is considered "terrorism" stems to his already prior criminal history, stunned shock of an event during a time of celebration and inability to be distracted so easily.

As I said before, we're arguing sematics which is a lengthy discussion as proven. Granted, it's better than the "race war" glowing that I've seen lately. I see your supporting argument. I'm just not invested enough in THAT when I already know everything else I need to know about Brooks.


One, it's a bit of bias from that event. Two, I don't remember much from it.

In that case, I would be accepting the sentiment that parents against CRT and trans policies in public schooling are considered terrorists and ANTIFA are peaceful protesting.

Disagree with me, sure. Say my logic is flawed, sure. But one thing I'm not is an NPC. I can think for myself despite popular consensus that would dictate me to think based on principles, research, free thought and independent perspective.

Do I think it's terrorism? Admittingly, I've been going back and forth on the fence with that.

View attachment 2743982

Now, here's a more pressing matter: could you check my tire pressure before I drive off to the next thread?
This country has danced around with this race supremacy bullshit in the past, from all angles and it never resulted in anything good except for a few select elites. I don't think I'm alone in thinking everyone is at risk at being manipulated. The ruling class is lashing out and using everything they can think of to force us to do as they want. Scarcity and rising prices of food, gas, goods and utilities combined with social and racial unrest? And of course the ridiculous coof mandates. It's deliberate.

Lady, you are not driving an electric car, which is in violation of Comrade Bai Den's proclamation. I'm going to have to take you in. Please turn off the engine, step out of the vehicle and keep your hands where I can see them.
 
Can I use you as a hypothetical? I hope so. I don't sincerely mean any of this. Hypothetical.

So let's say I'm driving down the street in my Ford and I see you on the sidewalk. I scream "NIGGERCUNT BITCH!" and run over you. That's a hate crime. I targeted you out of nowhere based on your race, sex, religion, etc and nothing else.

If I stalk you for months and hang out near your local political party headquarters then scream "JOAN CRAWFORDARIAN PARTY MEMBERS MUST DIE!" then run over you. That's terrorism. I'm now trying to influence the government and policy through terrorizing people.

With this guy's socials he would land in the former, not the latter, category. It can be both. It is as you said just missing the evidence to qualify for the latter at this moment.

If anyone is thinking with the whole Antifa thing why aren't they going after them for the rioting and violence on terrorism charges? That is an extremely good question. I have no fucking clue. They should.
Antifa isn't considered a mature political movement yet.
Academics and leftists expect them to evaporate like a bad Silicon Valley startup selling you juicers that only work when connected to wifi.
The definition of terrorisim is so loose, you could call anything a terrorist.

I'd say being a black nationalist, and plowing down white people in a car, after posting shit about it online is enough to qualify the fucker.
Send him to Diego Garcia and Waterboard him for the rest of his life.
 
Can I use you as a hypothetical? I hope so. I don't sincerely mean any of this. Hypothetical.

So let's say I'm driving down the street in my Ford and I see you on the sidewalk. I scream "NIGGERCUNT BITCH!" and run over you. That's a hate crime. I targeted you out of nowhere based on your race, sex, religion, etc and nothing else.

If I stalk you for months and hang out near your local political party headquarters then scream "JOAN CRAWFORDARIAN PARTY MEMBERS MUST DIE!" then run over you. That's terrorism. I'm now trying to influence the government and policy through terrorizing people.

With this guy's socials he would land in the former, not the latter, category. It can be both. It is as you said just missing the evidence to qualify for the latter at this moment.

If anyone is thinking with the whole Antifa thing why aren't they going after them for the rioting and violence on terrorism charges? That is an extremely good question. I have no fucking clue. They should.
bette-hmm.gif


Okay, I'm taken aback with me used in such an example so give me a minute.

...

Okay.

If you mug me, that's a mugging.
If you mug me with racial remarks, that's a hate crime. It's proven that I'm targeted because of my race.
If you commit a crime against me in public or on private property because I have X political belief, that's terrorism. It's politically motivated.

Hate crime and terrorism are not mutually exclusive. They can intersect.

Lady, you are not driving an electric car, which is in violation of Comrade Bai Den's proclamation. I'm going to have to take you in. Please turn off the engine, step out of the vehicle and keep your hands where I can see them.
Bullshit. You're harassing her because she's a woman driving a car in the 20th century. Take your sexism elsewhere. Give me your name and badge number.
 
Antifa isn't considered a mature political movement yet.
Academics and leftists expect them to evaporate like a bad Silicon Valley startup selling you juicers that only work when connected to wifi.
The definition of terrorisim is so loose, you could call anything a terrorist.

I'd say being a black nationalist, and plowing down white people in a car, after posting shit about it online is enough to qualify the fucker.
Send him to Diego Garcia and Waterboard him for the rest of his life.
He isn't part of a group or ideology. If he's swearing loyalty to Donald DeFreeze and publishing his manifesto and did this, I'd be totally on board. Totally terrorism.

But it's all just generic woke BLM slacktivist horseshit. Like most criminally-inclined people he's just adopting the SJW patina because it allows him to get away with more criminal shit.
 
This country has danced around with this race supremacy bullshit in the past, from all angles and it never resulted in anything good except for a few select elites. I don't think I'm alone in thinking everyone is at risk at being manipulated. The ruling class is lashing out and using everything they can think of to force us to do as they want. Scarcity and rising prices of food, gas, goods and utilities combined with social and racial unrest? And of course the ridiculous coof mandates. It's deliberate.
So you're saying you're calling it terrorism TO prove a point? Okay then, I abstain then.

In the 20th century, it was literal White supremacy. Which had more social influence than even the MAFIA.

In Current Year, it's WOKE supremacy. Based on the same principles and playbook, only with having the Internet to spread it.

But it's all just generic woke BLM slacktivist horseshit. Like most criminally-inclined people he's just adopting the SJW patina because it allows him to get away with more criminal shit.
That same organization which enables and attracts criminality.
 
Can I use you as a hypothetical? I hope so. I don't sincerely mean any of this. Hypothetical.

So let's say I'm driving down the street in my Ford and I see you on the sidewalk. I scream "NIGGERCUNT BITCH!" and run over you. That's a hate crime. I targeted you out of nowhere based on your race, sex, religion, etc and nothing else.

If I stalk you for months and hang out near your local political party headquarters then scream "JOAN CRAWFORDARIAN PARTY MEMBERS MUST DIE!" then run over you. That's terrorism. I'm now trying to influence the government and policy through terrorizing people.

With this guy's socials he would land in the former, not the latter, category. It can be both. It is as you said just missing the evidence to qualify for the latter at this moment.

If anyone is thinking with the whole Antifa thing why aren't they going after them for the rioting and violence on terrorism charges? That is an extremely good question. I have no fucking clue. They should.
I thought that would qualify as coercion, not Terrorism.
Maybe terroristic threats.
I thought physical attacks with an ideological motive were considered terrorism.
 
If anyone is thinking with the whole Antifa thing why aren't they going after them for the rioting and violence on terrorism charges? That is an extremely good question. I have no fucking clue. They should.
There is the very real concern of sending extremists to prison since they tend to yammer on and on and while most of what they say is lost in translation the most extreme parts stick and are spread by people who barely grasp the concepts which is how you get things like 5%s, the aryan brotherhood believing whites have alien dna that gives them super powers and that a chilean is the same as a peruvian. they may be worried sending them in en mass will turn an already shitty situation worse.
 
In Current Year, it's WOKE supremacy. Based on the same principles and playbook, only with having the Internet to spread it.
Not just the internet, although that's definitely where it's most professed. There's also the electric J--I mean, television. So many channels that discuss political topics, yet very few of them care to speak of what's not on the leftist agenda. The way they push their ideas on the populace assigns those concepts a false sense of plurality and credibility.

A legitimate news source shouldn't need to declare itself "the most trusted name in news".
 
Last edited:
Got arrest footage. NBC found it from a house he was probably trying to get into to lay low.

EDIT: Found one with audio from their youtube page, NBC cut a part of it and are saying it's an accident. He goes up to the door and says he's homeless and that he's waiting for an Uber. And best part, he doesn't seem upset about just running over 50 people.
EDIT 2: Found an article to go along with this:
These lines:
>In an interview, Rider, who'd been away on a hunting trip and was watching football when the crash occurred, said he had no idea about what had just happened blocks away.
>He said he invited Brooks inside and gave him a jacket, made him a sandwich and let him use his phone.
A literal good Samaritan, only becoming spooked when the cops showed up.

For comparason, here's the house on 338 Maple where the car was ditched. Not sure where the above is though, probably somewhere on Dunbar. Should also be noted that Brooks was the only perp in this, the two black men reported fleeing from where the car was parked on Maple wern't involved and were probably picked up, questioned and released by police once they knew Brooks was the sole culprit.
Untitled2.png


More media

Roads are now open.
Untitled.png


1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg
Ha ha sticker machine go brrrr t. Fed
 
Last edited:
Antifa isn't considered a mature political movement yet.
Academics and leftists expect them to evaporate like a bad Silicon Valley startup selling you juicers that only work when connected to wifi.
The definition of terrorisim is so loose, you could call anything a terrorist.

I'd say being a black nationalist, and plowing down white people in a car, after posting shit about it online is enough to qualify the fucker.
Send him to Diego Garcia and Waterboard him for the rest of his life.
I mostly agree with you, but Antifa has been around for a good minute. Of course I'm not saying the old group and the new group are completely related, but the 'old Antifa', the group which modern Antifa takes its inspiration, icons, symbols, etc from first formed in 1932 in Germany. That's one of the reasons why those dismissing them as 'just an idea' [to include the current POTUS] look fucking retarded. They were organized then and they are organized now. Infact I would wager that Antifa is better organized than most of the militia groups [Three Percenters, Oathkeepers, etc] are, especially so in Portland. They have demonstrated their ability and resources quite well, especially last year, making it clear that they are an organized group likely with some form of hierarchy [even if it's just uppers to tell the lowers what to do] and while all the different 'cells' aren't necessarily in constant contact they do coordinate and cooperate.

That 'just an idea' shit and the notion that they're just some ragtag band of disorganized, retarded tankies are lies to cover the asses of people who utilize them as attack dogs and finance their ops. Who you think those people are is up to you to decide. While BLM and Antifa most certainly cooperated in 2020, and both orgs are absolutely writhing with Marxist maggots, this guy is probably distinct from that. If anything I would throw him in the category of Black Panther/NFAC, with a side dish of that Hotep 'an evil scientist made white people in a lab we built da pyramids cuh' shit. All retards, but distinct flavors of retard.

Oh, and for the record, I doubt he was officially affiliated with any group. I'd peg him as a lone wolf type, inspired by those groups and their rhetoric but unaffiliated. If the rumors of two other individuals being in the car with him were true, or turn out to be true, then I would be more willing to consider that he may have been affiliated.
 
That 'just an idea' shit and the notion that they're just some ragtag band of disorganized, exceptional tankies are lies to cover the asses of people who utilize them as attack dogs and finance their ops.
Most tankies ive talked to actually despise the antifa types and fully admit that if the cops used live rounds not tear gas theyd fold in a heartbeat which they should. tankies are an interesting type of autist.
 
bette-hmm.gif


Okay, I'm taken aback with me used in such an example so give me a minute.

...

Okay.

If you mug me, that's a mugging.
If you mug me with racial remarks, that's a hate crime. It's proven that I'm targeted because of my race.
If you commit a crime against me in public or on private property because I have X political belief, that's terrorism. It's politically motivated.

Hate crime and terrorism are not mutually exclusive. They can intersect.
In hindsight I should have used a funnier name of a car company. I'd rather be hypothetically run over by a Studebaker, personally.

Also, terrorism is a little bit more than just violence against a political affiliation. It's smashing up rallies or protests or counter-protests (which is why James Fields caught the charge) and smashing up party headquarters. Following around and intimidating party members. Something that would influence the course of government. The shit the KKK got up to would 100% be both terrorism and hate crimes in the modern context.
 
View attachment 2743995

Okay, I'm taken aback with me used in such an example so give me a minute.

...

Okay.

If you mug me, that's a mugging.
If you mug me with racial remarks, that's a hate crime. It's proven that I'm targeted because of my race.
If you commit a crime against me in public or on private property because I have X political belief, that's terrorism. It's politically motivated.

Hate crime and terrorism are not mutually exclusive. They can intersect.


Bullshit. You're harassing her because she's a woman driving a car in the 20th century. Take your sexism elsewhere. Give me your name and badge number.
OK ma'am, that's very funny. I get that you are up in years but I have to write you up for assuming my gender, which is a felony under Comrade Bai Den's Second Posthumous Proclamation. Exit the vehicle or I will have to drag you out.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Archivist Archon
Back