Waukesha, WI, Parade Vehicle Attack - Suspect is Darrell Edward Brooks, currently in custody.

Who's responsible?

  • Glowies

    Votes: 196 9.4%
  • Incel

    Votes: 57 2.7%
  • Truck of Peace

    Votes: 222 10.6%
  • BLM

    Votes: 708 34.0%
  • Retaliation for Kyle's Acquittal

    Votes: 539 25.9%
  • Minceraft

    Votes: 128 6.1%
  • Alt-Right Nazi Gamergater Chud

    Votes: 108 5.2%
  • Other (please specify)

    Votes: 127 6.1%

  • Total voters
    2,085
Yes, rap music is terrorism.
This thread is exceptional. even for me.

I would argue his rap music is terrorism. It is just that fucking bad.

Hell, I consider the Dallas BLM sniper more of a terrorist than Brooks based on his premedication and planning to outright KILL police officers during a voliate time of political unrest. And I don't use that term lightly. And they share similar beliefs.
The reason people are all in on the Terrorism possibility is that the times it was CLEARLY terrorism it got downplayed and memory-holed. Every fucking news organization refused to tie a fucking SNIPER KILLING COPS during a protest against cops, to the ideology that said cops fucking suck and needed to die. The same shit is happening here.

And I don't think this actually was terrorism, but definitely a hate crime, by their own definitions. Again, if this murderous piece of shit had been a white dude with similar shit on his Facebook, and an album full of racist country music, it wouldn't even be a question as to why he did what he did. They would say it was all showing how horrible and racist America is.

But this sex-offending neanderthal saying run over white people? His hatred? It is acceptable and considered normal. Because he has been oppressed and is lashing out at a bullshit society. He did a wrong thing, and it had nothing to do with any of his hate speech (their definition, not mine)

Let's be honest the anti white shit in his posts and songs is no worse than what a million Karens a day post on Twitter, or what endless brainwashed white people actually believe about themselves.

They don't want to see it as a hate crime, because it would mean their beliefs could lead to a fucking hate crime against their own people... and they don't see WHITE PEOPLE (like those dirty Drumpf voters) as the same as them.

Doesn't fucking matter anyway. This thing is already getting memory-holed by the MSM. It'll be gone within another day or two, tops.

"It’s not that any of the information Ngo strung together about Brooks appears to be wrong. But it is framed in bad faith to lead a casual reader to the entirely unfounded conclusion that this was a racial attack of some sort."
Fuck the Daily Beast.

Entirely unfounded? Fuck that. Words mean shit you commie fuckers. There IS foundation for it, the subhuman filth said he hated white people and wanted to run them over. It might be wrong, but it has foundation.
 
Fuck the Daily Beast.

Entirely unfounded? Fuck that. Words mean shit you commie fuckers. There IS foundation for it, the subhuman filth said he hated white people and wanted to run them over. It might be wrong, but it has foundation.
The argument is entirely based on disconnecting his clearly stated views from his actions. Since Andy can't provide a definitive "I'm gonna run over White people" statement in his posts, then there is no reason to make the association and doing so implies a dishonest motive on Ngo's part.

It's ridiculous and ignores basic inference and common-sense reasoning but it's the sort of talmudic sophistry the Daily Beast is good at.
 

The Daily Beast has come out to explain how this actually wasn't what it is.

"Well like its bad faith editing man"

Even they have to acknowledge what he said is true.

"It’s not that any of the information Ngo strung together about Brooks appears to be wrong. But it is framed in bad faith to lead a casual reader to the entirely unfounded conclusion that this was a racial attack of some sort."

Ah yes, but there was an attack against Whites by someone for whom we have social media records discussing his hatred of White people, but that's not evidence of racial animus we swear!
Hahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahaha

"Yeah everything he said is true but we don't like it's true so please disregard"
 
They don't want to see it as a hate crime, because it would mean their beliefs could lead to a fucking hate crime against their own people... and they don't see WHITE PEOPLE (like those dirty Drumpf voters) as the same as them.
If they start to see the cracks in what they spout out then the thing that gives them the feeling of moral superiority, the only time they can feel better than anyone is gone. then theyd have to face being failures and bad people.
 
The reason people are all in on the Terrorism possibility is that the times it was CLEARLY terrorism it got downplayed and memory-holed. Every fucking news organization refused to tie a fucking SNIPER KILLING COPS during a protest against cops, to the ideology that said cops fucking suck and needed to die. The same shit is happening here.

Whether we're calling this "terrorism" or a hate crime, the propensity for some people on this website of all places to attempt to downplay the obvious race-based hatred and degenerate freak left radicalization of the perpetrator is mind-blowing.
 
If they start to see the cracks in what they spout out then the thing that gives them the feeling of moral superiority, the only time they can feel better than anyone is gone. then theyd have to face being failures and bad people.
We've quite literally seen countless examples of these kind of people being CLEARLY wrong and being proven wrong, all they do is delete the tweet/post and lock down their social media for 24 hours , then block anyone who brings it up
 
We've quite literally seen countless examples of these kind of people being CLEARLY wrong and being proven wrong, all they do is delete the tweet/post and lock down their social media for 24 hours , then block anyone who brings it up
Yeah, and if its gone it didnt happen your a right wing liar and i will fuse any unrelated thing to this to distance it and make it too complex so i dont need to think about it.
t-some journo who will never write for the new york times
 
Whether we're calling this "terrorism" or a hate crime, the propensity for some people on this website of all places to attempt to downplay the obvious race-based hatred and degenerate freak left radicalization of the perpetrator is mind-blowing.
I've seen them unironically comparing his social media footprint to that of a "white Karen".
 
The reason people are all in on the Terrorism possibility is that the times it was CLEARLY terrorism it got downplayed and memory-holed. Every fucking news organization refused to tie a fucking SNIPER KILLING COPS during a protest against cops, to the ideology that said cops fucking suck and needed to die. The same shit is happening here.

And I don't think this actually was terrorism, but definitely a hate crime, by their own definitions. Again, if this murderous piece of shit had been a white dude with similar shit on his Facebook, and an album full of racist country music, it wouldn't even be a question as to why he did what he did. They would say it was all showing how horrible and racist America is.

But this sex-offending neanderthal saying run over white people? His hatred? It is acceptable and considered normal. Because he has been oppressed and is lashing out at a bullshit society. He did a wrong thing, and it had nothing to do with any of his hate speech (their definition, not mine)

Let's be honest the anti white shit in his posts and songs is no worse than what a million Karens a day post on Twitter, or what endless brainwashed white people actually believe about themselves.

They don't want to see it as a hate crime, because it would mean their beliefs could lead to a fucking hate crime against their own people... and they don't see WHITE PEOPLE (like those dirty Drumpf voters) as the same as them.

Doesn't fucking matter anyway. This thing is already getting memory-holed by the MSM. It'll be gone within another day or two, tops.
And that's what Yuri calls "normalization."
 
I think calling this situation terrorism is extreme
guy who calls himself a black terrorist sees hes about to get locked up and says fuck might as well before getting arrested drives a car into a crowd of the people his ideaology labels evil. i'll grant we've debased words so much it feels hard to know if you and another person are having the same convo at times but no. this fits. extend him the same good will and mercy he'd show you
 
This sentence:
>In an interview, Rider, who'd been away on a hunting trip and was watching football when the crash occurred, said he had no idea about what had just happened blocks away.
>He said he invited Brooks inside and gave him a jacket, made him a sandwich and let him use his phone.
>"All of a sudden, I look outside my street and I see a few cop cars drive by and I'm getting extra nervous," he said.
A good Samaritan. Imagine if Brooks was armed. Jesus.

View attachment 2744092
Should have followed the advice of Massad Ayoob:
 

The Daily Beast has come out to explain how this actually wasn't what it is.

"Well like its bad faith editing man"

Even they have to acknowledge what he said is true.

"It’s not that any of the information Ngo strung together about Brooks appears to be wrong. But it is framed in bad faith to lead a casual reader to the entirely unfounded conclusion that this was a racial attack of some sort."

Ah yes, but there was an attack against Whites by someone for whom we have social media records discussing his hatred of White people, but that's not evidence of racial animus we swear!
As if any of these journoswine can talk about bad faith reporting when the Daily Beast has likely smeared Kyle as a white supremacist with even less evidence over his actions last year. Seriously, what did the MSN have to go on other than he had a gun on him and shot 2 riotous scumbags to claim he's a racist white nationalist? The most one could say was that video of him saying he wished he had his gun to shoot at looters and that meeting with the proud boys, and that didn't even come out until months after the shooting when they already defamed him.

How about Brooks, he has posted a bunch of tweets that reference black nationalist beliefs, wrote a fuck Donald Trump song, expressed support for BLM, and probably said fuck whitey at least several times. By their own standards, Brooks should be characterized as a militant black supremacist that had racial motives. It's infuriating how they can just slither away from this with their kike trickery and get no real repercussions. This blatant hypocrisy just pisses me off, either the standards are applied equally or don't fucking apply them at all.

ETA: For the record, I don't believe Brooks is a terrorist, just a psychopathic tard that has no value for human life other than his own. It just pisses me off that the label applies to whitey so easily but if it's a black guy you can't do that.
 
Back