Kiwi Farms NFT Discussion

Interest guage

  • Interested, and I have crypto

    Votes: 112 17.7%
  • Interested, but I don't understand crypto

    Votes: 82 12.9%
  • Not interested, and I have crypto

    Votes: 145 22.9%
  • Not interested, and I don't understand crypto

    Votes: 71 11.2%
  • Sneed

    Votes: 224 35.3%

  • Total voters
    634
My question is: why an NFT? Do you expect there to be any kind of secondary market for whatever you'll hand out? If there isn't, there's no point and you might as well just sell access to your birds-and-dogs JPG folder directly.

I say rather than going through the NFT rigmarole, just sell some novelty forum features for small crypto donations. (Yeah yeah, Lowtax blah blah blah, I know) After all, the forum itself is the one KF-related thing that we all use and has an inherent single point of control where you can introduce scarce resources on a per-user basis.
Maybe have extra themes for crypto donors, or a user banner that says "Crypto Fag", or have a little pixelated slobberdog replace the green "online indicator" dot for donors, I dunno.
 
I want an OG Chris Kiwi, Sonichu medallion & the fucking blue and red striped shirt
 
@Null you need to generate controversy and FOMO like stonetoss did. You whine "boo hoo nobody likes me" but just think for a second how you can use it to your advantage. Stonetoss' popularity shows how every seething and scathing post is only more advertisement to you. Unironically, there is no bad publicity, only bad marketing.

I'm spitballing here, but what if you did ask people who hate your guts to collab? A few will ignore you, few will tell you to fuck off, but most importantly some will talk about it publicly and make fun or ridicule you in front of their (sometimes sizable) audiences. There's your exposure. Could you somehow "leak" this to the Verge, Motherboard, Vice, etc? They'll be sure to write up articles about muh suicide causing nazi website. There's your controversy.

I'm no social media expert or marketing executive, but hey whatever.
My man here is running a site basically tailored for people who are stuck in a time loop in the early 2000's when social media didn't exist, all discourse on the internet happened on forums, and most of that discourse was calling each other nigger and making rape jokes. No shit we don't know how or want to know how to use crypto or NFT's or all this other postpostpostmodern faggotry. We're Luddites, dummy. Most of us probably don't even know how to use *Twitter* much less some e-coin exchange bullshit.
Why is this a bad thing? I'm here because I've had it with Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, etc. and pretty much all the chans are no longer the fun they used to be. Also, this is a site where you can call the admin a faggot and you know he'll read it.

Hey @Null! You're a faggot!
 
Last edited:
So it's stupid if I do it and a multi-million dollar idea if someone else does it. Does this just sum up my life?
people don't want you making money & be successful .

but if say you only going to put effort in few that does not break tos then

peope will buy, & do samething as stonetoss limited sale set date & time.

*if corpo going to be gay figs about this contract nft to someone else who will save transfer the money.

*people would like buy your avatar as super rare ,christ as legendary teir , ralph is questionable due him willing willing to DMCA it.

*we do expect a fed smoker kiwi or dog.
 
I like the idea of selling some form of NFT, However I don't know if the art route would be a smash hit.

I think that for Art NFTs to sell a lot, it has to come from an established artist and have a decent hypetrain behind it. I was close to getting a stone toss NFT because I do think that he is a up-and-coming artist and may be value in his NFTs. However I didn't buy it in the end because of all the e–celebrities shilling. Stonetoss basically did the Salvador Dalí thing of paying people with doodles on receipts and made it look like he cares more about quickly selling to retards who will never buy another NFT in the future because they have no money because they follow people like Ralph. If you’re r selling to killstream fans its a scam in my eyes.

I wouldn't get a Kiwi NFT unless it was pretty cheap, as I don't think there will be a huge collectors market for it. But, I don't know what the upfront cost of it would be so you could try, worse case is it doesn't sell big but gives you some crypto and xp in this.


⬇️WARNING, MY DUMB IDEAS ONLY BELOW THIS LINE ⬇️

Somebody earlier in the thread mentioned selling posts as NFT's. A dumb (but potentially lucrative) idea i had would be to put some of the internet famous threads up for auction. Let e-celebs get into a bidding war with their hater communities (and wealthy simps) for the rights to the thread. Its scummy but I hate 99% of the internet famous board so nothing of value would be lost in my eyes.
 
but why would I do that when everyone seems to prefer the avatar generator approach. I don't understand it as it is so why would I put a spin on it.
Maybe a hundred different original null doggy avatars?
 
Okay, I wouldn't buy an NFT, but maybe you and your merch artists could design a set of Kiwi Farms based Telegram stickers? We obviously have plenty of material to work with, and Telegram is an extremely popular platform. Make up a set of a dozen or so stickers, with full res images included, and sell it for a few bucks. Just compress it into a zip file and use the payment processor you did for the coins. Sell it cheap and lots of people will buy it en masse and make up the cost. Could make many Kiwis that resemble people with threads, so they can't sue, like Ralph or Melinda would instantly.

30 dollar nft, or 5 bucks for a Telegram sticker set you can use in any capacity you wish? The latter is easier to sell to people due to cost and actually having a use beyond novelty, and the cheaper price encourages purchase instead of simply screen capping or right clicking it.
 
Why bother having a discussion about NFTs at all?

The people that buy them are knuckle-dragging retards with more money than sense, trying to reason with them seems to just me a surefire way to make them less interested since FOMO and flavor of the month is what motivates their purchases.
I'm not saying do it or don't do it, but I think even things like cautiously gauging interest are going to lower interest in it if you do decide to. If this was some lofty and intricate business venture you'd be best testing the water, but it's not- it's getting retards to fork over some pocket change for literal screenshots of a randomly generated cartoon bird.
 
If I ever got one, I know what I would want it to be based on.
430full-kiwi!-screenshot.jpg
 
If you end up doing it probably dont host them on eth, use something with lower gas fees instead. I like solana, a lot of big nft projects use it and its decently fast/cheap.
Also, since the upfront cost/time investment to set it up is reasonably low, you could look at it in this way: instead of being a product you buy, they could be a free gift for people who donate crypto (essentially the same thing, but the merit on which success is measured is different)
I like this idea a lot. If you implemented a limited supply procedural kiwi NFT reward for donating $20 in crypto that was displayed on our profile, I would get T&H. I wouldn’t pick Ethereum at the moment because of the ludicrous gas price, maybe a layer 2 solution like Polygon or another chain where gas is super cheap like Solana or Harmony One. Put the focus on supporting the site with a little trinket as a reward for the first 5,000. That’s up to $100K, and your only upfront cost is the ~$200 it would cost to have an artist make the designs, and however long it would take to mint them, write a smart contract to dispense them to donators <$20, and embed in profiles when proof of ownership is provided. Fuck it, give KiwiNFT owners a few exclusive stickers and suddenly you’ve also captured the FOMO for a market that doesn’t care about NFTs.
 
Last edited:
It’s the lack of actual art that makes me have no interest in NFTs, if it was a well thought out piece of art and not a bunch of slapped together assets. None of them are worth having the only one of it because they’re ugly and lazy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wright
I wouldn't ever be interested in NFT's unless it was work done by artists I genuinely enjoyed. Probably a dumb oversimplification but I try not to get too wrapped up in the technical breakdowns of what NFT's are outside of "its basically a certificate of authenticity that's recorded on the blockchain"

Genuinely skilled artists like Paul Kwon and Peter Mohrbacher have expressed interest in selling their art as NFT's, pretty sure the former already does. But dumb meme shit can fuck off

peter-mohrbacher-03.jpg
Peter Mohrbacher
tumblr_p95d1f1Rxe1tz7tbfo1_640.jpg
Paul Kwon
 
Starved artist here and i came to promote my new hot NFT line that is gonna crash the nft market. Allow me to introduce you to the Evan Gunt NFT(tm) series
Get yours today at kisstream.gay !!
DISCLAIMER: any similarity to actual persons, living, gunted or soon to be dead, is purely coincidental
ev1.jpg
ev2.jpg
ev3.jpg
ev4.jpg
ev5.jpg
 
I'd like some cute kiwi NFTs. Having NFTs of threads and lolcows is just a huge potential lawsuit which I'm sure no one here wants to inflict on you. Have you ever actually thought of getting an ENS domain for the farms? Something like 🥝🥝🥝.eth ? This shit is going to become more integrated into Web3.0 in the next few years.

"We must secure the existence of our FORUM and a future for white KIWIS"

web-2812buikiwi.jpg
 
Back