US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?

 

[Vaclav]

Booker is probably the best of that bunch in that he's a blank slate. Newsom might be able to shift blame to Gascon for the high crime rate while continuing to demand more COVID restrictions. Inslee is in similar circumstances.

Buttigieg has no chance due to having no idea how to deal with the supply chain crisis AND is a part of Biden's cabinet. Beta is Beta Gun Grabber.

The Republicans should absolutely turn California into a scapegoat. Largely because the state deserves it. Just be the opposite of every Californian policy.

Booker's most significant recent action has been to sponsor and pass a law banning the import of generic prescription drugs from Canada, which was a price-saving technique that helped elderly people on fixed incomes. I'd like to see him justify it in an age of skyrocketing inflation.

 

[Gehenna]

So we know it's quite unlikely to be Biden or Kamala running in 2024. They'll have to bring someone else in. Even if they're certain they have no chance to win, they won't run a vegetable Biden. If he continues to deteriorate at his current rate, he'll barely be able to speak and trying to make him run would make them look pathetic and more than a bit evil. If they're sure it'll be a loss for them they could put Kamala up in order to get rid of her.

So otherwise, who's the replacement likely to be? People have suggested Corey Booker, Gavin Newsom and Jay Inslee, and possibly Liz Warren,, Buttigieg or Beto. Has there been any research on match-ups between Trump and any of these hopefuls? I figure their best hope is to bring out someone who hasn't been in the national spotlight and puff them up with favorable news coverage. Newsom and Inslee could easily be attacked for allowing their states to degenerate into lawless hellholes covered with tent camps, even before 2020. It'd be great to watch Inslee getting grilled about CHAZ during a debate.

Biden's handlers had him announce he was running in 2024. So short of him dying... its Biden.

 

[Terrifik]

Exactly what the US should be doing

Instead we have the kind of riots that involve niggers and danglehairs and soyboys looting, destroying statues, and setting shit on fire.

only riot that mttered in USA was occupy wallstreet.

 

[Puff]

Biden's handlers had him announce he was running in 2024. So short of him dying... its Biden.

Why would they do this? I don't understand what the benefit is unless they PLAN on him dying. (not saying they'll assassinate him, but look at the guy. Keeling over is a good bet)

 

[Vyse Inglebard]

Planet Earth or 14,000 coal jobs. Guess which Sen. Joe Manchin picked?
It's no stretch to conclude that Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin is risking the planet's future to protect a dwindling pool of 14,000 coal mining jobs in his home state of West Virginia. As bad as that sounds, there are even more cynical explanations for Manchin single-handedly blocking crucial elements of President Joe Biden's climate action plan. Like money. Manchin owns about $1 million in Enersystems shares, his son's coal brokerage firm. And the senator raised $400,000 in campaign funds in the last quarter from oil and gas interests, even though he doesn't run for reelection until 2024.

Cutting greenhouse gas emissions​

Whatever the motivations, Manchin is working hard to kill something called the Clean Electricity Performance Program (CEPP), a core element of the climate legislation embedded in Biden's massive "human infrastructure" or Build Back Better bill that Democrats are struggling to negotiate in Congress. The legislation would be passed through a process called reconciliation that allows for simple majority approval in the Senate. That means every Democratic vote counts, and thus Manchin can play spoiler if he wants. Biden's goal is to cut America's greenhouse gas emissions by 50 to 52% by 2030, a necessary goal if the United States and other nations hope to attain net zero emissions by mid-century to prevent catastrophic increases in global warming. Dramatic steps must come this decade, scientists say, and Biden's plan goes a long way there with a combination of electrical vehicle transition investments; reductions in methane, the worst of greenhouse gases; stepped-up agricultural and forestry carbon removal efforts; and a transformed electrical power grid. The primary engine would be the $150 billion clean electricity program designed to use tax credits and penalties as carrots and stick to compel power companies to more rapidly shift from coal- and gas-fired plants to renewable energy.

The dirt on coal​

The dirtiest of fossil fuels by far is coal – so polluting that it's already on the decline in the United States and globally. "We need the CEPP to take on the climate crisis. It's just that simple," climate and energy police expert Leah Stokes tweeted. Manchin is saying no. He argues that electrical companies are already transitioning to renewable energy, so it isn't necessary to reward them for doing so. To the extent that's true, it's largely to meet new power demands. It's the hundreds of existing plants burning coal and gas that need to be replaced with renewable energy. The clean electricity program would have gradually increased pressure on power companies to make the transition. But that isn't all Manchin wants to cut. Word surfaced Monday that he wants to excise a provision that would levee a fine on oil and gas firms that allow methane to leak from wells and pipelines, one of the six most important elements of Biden's climate plan.

Global climate summit begins Sunday​

It's not impossible to fill the gaps Manchin is carving out of Biden's plan. The Rhodium Group, a nonpartisan analysis firm, argues that a patchwork of generous renewable energy tax incentives, along with tougher regulations from the Environmental Protection Agency and new restrictions by individual states, could recoup some of the lost reductions in greenhouse gases. "We think it's doable," Rhodium's John Larsen said. But he concedes there's plenty of risk that new EPA provisions could be blocked in court or reversed by a future administration (as happened with Donald Trump), or that not enough states will follow through.

The tragedy is that Manchin seized this moment to make his stand for West Virginia's dying coal industry. Biden's Build Back Better legislation, which once had a price tag of $3.5 trillion, is being trimmed to between $1.5 trillion to $1.9 trillion as Democrats race to produce a framework the president can show the world at a global climate summit that begins Sunday in Glasgow, Scotland. Time is running out, and future generations may look back at an opportunity lost and blame Joe Manchin. They'd be right.

Planet Earth or 14,000 coal jobs. Guess which Sen. Joe Manchin picked?

archived 24 Nov 2021 20:09:31 UTC

archive.md

________________________________________________________
You can practically feel the seething from this article. "How DARE Sen. Manchin create more jobs for his constituents instead of lining our pockets instead caring about the ENVIRONMENT?! REEEEEEEEEEEE"

 

[Drag-on Knight 91873]

only riot that mttered in USA was occupy wallstreet.

And proof gatekeeping against feminists and soyboys is necessary. Although in Occupy's case, that's every college student.

 

[Vaclav]

Biden's handlers had him announce he was running in 2024. So short of him dying... its Biden.

Is that for sure? They have to say he'll run, otherwise he's an instant lame duck and he loses whatever political leverage he might still have. They can maintain that he'll run for the time being, then in 2023 they can announce he has a health problem and won't be running and start the media blitz for their chosen candidate.

 

[Constellationzero]

Except these dumbasses forgot that internet archival sites exist. Once on the internet, always on the internet.

Jesus, this really is 1970s Part II: Child-Sniffer Boogaloo.

Have fun losing money, retards! Seriously, I'm a paying fucking customer. Either give me the full range of options, or don't let me on at all. This "privileges for the vaccinated only" bullshit is literally segregation 2.0. "bUT We'rE SAvInG livEs though!" No, you aren't. Stop lying. You're "saving people" from a slightly worse version of the common cold, a disease most healthy people bounce back from easily.

You ever notice on these articles, when it's fascist leftist repression shit like this, the COVID Thanksgiving bouncer article, and the related one written by the unhygienic leftist troon about relatives at Thanksgiving, that for all the LOVE/TOLERANCE/PEACE/ACCEPTANCE/EDUCATION/WISDOM/NO BOOLY not one of these articles allows comments??

Now why is that? Bloomberg here acknowledges that treating the unvaccinated like 2nd class is UNPOPULAR with the public, yet... no one is allowed the opportunity to freely express their thoughts and insights on this?

C'mon, MAAAAAAAAAAAAN!
Something something something rIgHt sIdE oF hIsToRy! something something eDuCaTe yOuRsElVeS! Education and discourse--things you attend collage for--involve opening yourselves up to DIFFERENT opinions and ideas. Now how can you even get a grasp on what policies and laws would be popular if you shut comments down?

 

[Gehenna]

Why would they do this? I don't understand what the benefit is unless they PLAN on him dying. (not saying they'll assassinate him, but look at the guy. Keeling over is a good bet)

Is that for sure? They have to say he'll run, otherwise he's an instant lame duck and he loses whatever political leverage he might still have. They can maintain that he'll run for the time being, then in 2023 they can announce he has a health problem and won't be running and start the media blitz for their chosen candidate.

Yes, because there was no reason for them to say it otherwise. An assumed second run is more than sufficient to maintain that illusion. The only thing gained by saying it out loud is more damage if he ends up not being able to run.

As to -why-.... I increasingly lean towards this being the cabal saying they won't run anyone, forcing the hand of the handler. Mainly because the cabal knows 2024 is looking -grim-, hellishly -grim- and they have no hope of pulling off another 2020 with how drained the coffers are and absolutely no way to fill it. So they are chalking it up to a loss, forcing Biden to run, and securing as much of their gains as they can before the hammer falls.

 

[The Big O]

Yes, because there was no reason for them to say it otherwise. An assumed second run is more than sufficient to maintain that illusion. The only thing gained by saying it out loud is more damage if he ends up not being able to run.

As to -why-.... I increasingly lean towards this being the cabal saying they won't run anyone, forcing the hand of the handler. Mainly because the cabal knows 2024 is looking -grim-, hellishly -grim- and they have no hope of pulling off another 2020 with how drained the coffers are and absolutely no way to fill it. So they are chalking it up to a loss, forcing Biden to run, and securing as much of their gains as they can before the hammer falls.

Biden is being held together by balsa wood, toothpicks and glue and we're just shy of a year in under his despotic administration. His handlers would need to pump him with an unholy cocktail of designer drugs just to keep him lucid for another three. I cannot see that ghoul lasting otherwise on his own without some very public spectacles of physical and mental rot taking place.

 

[DicksOutForKiwigglers]

Whatever the motivations, Manchin is working hard to kill something called the Clean Electricity Performance Program (CEPP), a core element of the climate legislation embedded in Biden's massive "human infrastructure" or Build Back Better bill that Democrats are struggling to negotiate in Congress. The legislation would be passed through a process called reconciliation that allows for simple majority approval in the Senate. That means every Democratic vote counts, and thus Manchin can play spoiler if he wants.

Wow, wow. The BBB can't be fillibustered? That's actually frightening. They only need one RINO to get it through.

 

[Thomas Talus]

Booker is probably the best of that bunch in that he's a blank slate.

I get the impression that blank slate is actually a closet door.

 

[tehpope]

So we know it's quite unlikely to be Biden or Kamala running in 2024. They'll have to bring someone else in. Even if they're certain they have no chance to win, they won't run a vegetable Biden. If he continues to deteriorate at his current rate, he'll barely be able to speak and trying to make him run would make them look pathetic and more than a bit evil. If they're sure it'll be a loss for them they could put Kamala up in order to get rid of her.

So otherwise, who's the replacement likely to be? People have suggested Corey Booker, Gavin Newsom and Jay Inslee, and possibly Liz Warren,, Buttigieg or Beto. Has there been any research on match-ups between Trump and any of these hopefuls? I figure their best hope is to bring out someone who hasn't been in the national spotlight and puff them up with favorable news coverage. Newsom and Inslee could easily be attacked for allowing their states to degenerate into lawless hellholes covered with tent camps, even before 2020. It'd be great to watch Inslee getting grilled about CHAZ during a debate.

The dems have nobody. Corey, Jay, Liz, and Buttboy all ran in 2020. Lost to Biden. Bootyedge would get roasted over not clearing up the ports and what not. Beto is posion. All the opposition has to do is play the "Hell Yes we're coming after your guns" clip over and over. Gavin is also poison, but could possibly work. As long as the GOP shows how California ended up a failure under him, its over.

The Dems salted the grounds after obama and have no one else. They could find a randy but would probably have them push their agenda. Maybe Yang and Tulsi. They still have some dnc talking points, but are less posion. But who knows if Yang wants to run again. And Hillary et. al would rather have the earth destroyed than have Tulsi be their front runner.

They could win if Trump croaks between now and 2024. Maybe. But I could still see a Rino run and still win. Which would be a win for the uniparty anyways.

 

[Gehenna]

Wow, wow. The BBB can't be fillibustered? That's actually frightening. They only need one RINO to get it through.

Uuuuhm, don't get ahead of yourself there. The democrats keep -trying- to shove stuff in the reconciliation process. And keep being told to go fuck themselves.

 

[Some Badger]

Meant to post this yesterday, but Campus Reform managed to do a live Q&A in Washington, D.C. talking to college students as to what they think about the rising costs of inflation and the students were not even aware of the higher costs of it.

They even admitted that a few years ago, Thanksgiving dinners were much better to buy and get while Trump was President.

Leave it to a an age group with zero real world experience and a largely near-nonexistent concept of managing a budget to not realize how fucked prices are for everyone else. The worst part is they'll still blame Trump for it.

 

[Ponderous Pillock]

The dems have nobody. Corey, Jay, Liz, and Buttboy all ran in 2020. Lost to Biden. Bootyedge would get roasted over not clearing up the ports and what not. Beto is posion. All the opposition has to do is play the "Hell Yes we're coming after your guns" clip over and over. Gavin is also poison, but could possibly work. As long as the GOP shows how California ended up a failure under him, its over.

The Dems salted the grounds after obama and have no one else. They could find a randy but would probably have them push their agenda. Maybe Yang and Tulsi. They still have some dnc talking points, but are less posion. But who knows if Yang wants to run again. And Hillary et. al would rather have the earth destroyed than have Tulsi be their front runner.

They could win if Trump croaks between now and 2024. Maybe. But I could still see a Rino run and still win. Which would be a win for the uniparty anyways.

Surfer Mommy's being shoved into DINO territory by simply saying shit which wasn't out of place 6 years ago in the DNC. She'll probably wind up jumping parties at some point.

 

[CrippleThreat]

The dems have nobody. Corey, Jay, Liz, and Buttboy all ran in 2020. Lost to Biden. Bootyedge would get roasted over not clearing up the ports and what not. Beto is posion. All the opposition has to do is play the "Hell Yes we're coming after your guns" clip over and over. Gavin is also poison, but could possibly work. As long as the GOP shows how California ended up a failure under him, its over.

The Dems salted the grounds after obama and have no one else. They could find a randy but would probably have them push their agenda. Maybe Yang and Tulsi. They still have some dnc talking points, but are less posion. But who knows if Yang wants to run again. And Hillary et. al would rather have the earth destroyed than have Tulsi be their front runner.

The Democratic Party will need a complete overhaul between literally as I post this and 22-24 in order to salvage anything.

Their base's floor is cracking thanks to the believers autistically jumping up and down to block out criticisms. Biden is never going to be That Nigga.

Seriously, get Trump and Rethuglikkkans out of their mouths, and they'll run for the hills first than openly admit Biden sucks and they should have stayed home Nov. 2020.

 

[jspit2.0]

Wow, wow. The BBB can't be fillibustered? That's actually frightening. They only need one RINO to get it through.

You rang?

(I'm joking, she's on the record saying she'll vote against it).

 

[Oxous]

So we know it's quite unlikely to be Biden or Kamala running in 2024. They'll have to bring someone else in. Even if they're certain they have no chance to win, they won't run a vegetable Biden. If he continues to deteriorate at his current rate, he'll barely be able to speak and trying to make him run would make them look pathetic and more than a bit evil. If they're sure it'll be a loss for them they could put Kamala up in order to get rid of her.

So otherwise, who's the replacement likely to be? People have suggested Corey Booker, Gavin Newsom and Jay Inslee, and possibly Liz Warren,, Buttigieg or Beto. Has there been any research on match-ups between Trump and any of these hopefuls? I figure their best hope is to bring out someone who hasn't been in the national spotlight and puff them up with favorable news coverage. Newsom and Inslee could easily be attacked for allowing their states to degenerate into lawless hellholes covered with tent camps, even before 2020. It'd be great to watch Inslee getting grilled about CHAZ during a debate.

Biden is the only choice they really have, every other potential candidate as you mention is either so unpopular they'll never be elected, discredited due to their behavior during this administration or quite obscure. Obscurity isn't a non-starter but it might be discouraging to replace Biden with a no-name. Maybe the primaries in 2023/2024 will bring in some new faces but I think we can expect more of the same.

If Biden dies before 2024 I think a Governor would most likely be tapped for the role, simply because Democratic Governors offer a pool of candidates that all already have experience governing and probably aren't that controversial. IMO Cuomo would have been an excellent alternate for Biden, he's been in a Presidential cabinet before and actually has a lot of previous experience in D.C. Unfortunately for him nobody in the party will ever want to touch him again because he got busted for sexual assault. The likes of Newsom and Inslee as you mentioned would also be options.

Why would they do this? I don't understand what the benefit is unless they PLAN on him dying. (not saying they'll assassinate him, but look at the guy. Keeling over is a good bet)

The Democrats have completely attritioned themselves of any talented people. Say what you will about Trump, or his choices of people, but he dragged a lot of people who weren't career politicians or were politically obscure into the big boy leagues. Giving Congressional seats to people like Blake Masters, Madison Cawthorn, Tom Cotton, Josh Hawley, that's how you prevent your party from becoming politically stagnant like the Dems are now.

 

[Gehenna]

Biden is being held together by balsa wood, toothpicks and glue and we're just shy of a year in under his despotic administration. His handlers would need to pump him with an unholy cocktail of designer drugs just to keep him lucid for another three. I cannot see that ghoul lasting otherwise on his own without some very public spectacles of physical and mental rot taking place.

And yet, they have no other choices. The cabal likely sees this as a loss to begin with and they are focused on securing their ill-gotten gains as much as possible against the coming backlash. They have bigger problems.

And the handlers? They never had power to begin with that wasn't derived from the cabal backing.
In the end, bring on the spectacle.