Georgia 'LYNCHING' citizen fatally shoots unarmed black man ... Video Emerges, Grand Jury to Convene

The fatal shooting of Ahmaud Arbery -- a 25-year-old black man out for a jog when he was chased and killed -- was caught on video, prompting a call for a grand jury to review the case.

Arbery's death is being referred to as a modern-day lynching, as he was unarmed when he was gunned down in Brunswick, GA on February 23 by a white citizen named Travis McMichael ... who has not been arrested or charged. He also happens to be the son of a former district attorney investigator.

As you can see in the video, Arbery was jogging when he was stopped by McMichael and his father in a white pickup truck. McMichael was armed with a shotgun. Arbery appears to attempt to run around the truck before he and McMichael start grappling.

After at least 2 shots, the men continued struggling over the gun ... until Arbery stumbles away, shot in the mid-section, and then collapses to the ground. He was later pronounced dead.

McMichael has not been charged in the shooting ... reportedly because he and his father, who was in the back of the truck, claim they were trying to make a citizen's arrest. They claim Ahmaud fit the description of a suspect in a string of recent break-ins in the area.

After the emergence of the video, D.A. Pro Tempore Tom Durden has decided the case "should be presented to the grand jury of Glynn County for consideration of criminal charges against those involved in the death of Mr. Arbery.”

Ahmaud's family says the use of deadly force was unnecessary.

Video Shows Fatal Shooting of Ahmaud Arbery, Unarmed Black Man in Georgia

The fatal shooting of Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year-old unarmed black man, was caught on video and has prompted a grand jury investigation.

www.tmz.com

Here's the statement from the district attorney who was brought in to oversee the case and decide how and whether the case should be prosecuted.

Attorney Lee Merritt, who represents Arberys mother, claims "The series of events captured in this video confirm what all the evidence indicated prior to its release— Ahmaud Arbery was pursued by three white men that targeted him solely because of his race and murdered him..."

==============

Imagine being hunted by two fat hillbillies in a truck.

 

[mr.moon1488]

View attachment 2749505
@Shamash with a few clarifications. But still holy shit, what a nigger.


View attachment 2749524
EDIT: So ass blasted he just won't stop.

@Shamash Might be a glowing faggot, but you've been consistently dishonest throughout this entire thread.

 

[Bunny Tracks]

One of them was a former sheriff's deputy and there had already been scores of reports of a prowler in the area, as well as multiple robberies. That's why the local police contacted them and asked them to be on the lookout for Arbery. Why do you have so much of an opinion on this case that you're spitting paragraphs when you don't know even the basic facts?

Then they should've called the police after they saw him instead of screaming at him, chasing him down in a pick-up truck, and pulling a shotgun on him.

Why is this so fucking hard to understand?

 

[Secret Asshole]

One of them was a former sheriff's deputy and there had already been scores of reports of a prowler in the area, as well as multiple robberies. That's why the local police contacted them and asked them to be on the lookout for Arbery. Why do you have so much of an opinion on this case that you're spitting paragraphs when you don't know even the basic facts?

How is any of this relevant? This doesn't change anything.

"Guys went out armed, chased a guy down, cornered him with guns drawn, shot him." The suspect wasn't Aubrery. He was never one. He was just randomly there. They had no business playing cop. This changes absolutely nothing about what they did and they could have easily started a shoot-out in a suburban neighborhood for no fucking reason at all.

And all that shit just makes it worse. When cops ask citizens to 'be on the lookout' it means CALL THEM IF YOU SEE THEM. It has always meant that. Not 'get in your white trash mobile with your shotgun and drive around looking'. And a former deputy? A power tripping asshole without a badge, golly. Yeah, that's who I want, someone with no authority pretending they still have authority.

 

[Techpriest]

I disagree. He had as much of a right as anyone else there to be there. Protests by and large are stupid in my opinion but if you want to stand around and yell by all means.

Sure, but that’s sticking around during the day and sticking with a nice big group if you’re still around when shit starts to go fully out of control once it’s dark. He’s got the right to be there, yes, but it doesn’t mean that everyone who was still out after curfew wasn’t being stupid to some degree, including Kyle.

The main point though is that Arbery had every right to resist an unlawful and felonious attempt to detain him for unspecified reasons by those not even wearing a badge.

 

[The Last Stand]

How does one properly do a citizen's arrest without it being kidnapping?

 

[Techpriest]

How does one properly do a citizen's arrest without it being kidnapping?

Very specific criteria have to be met. The key one? You have to see the crime happening, or they have to admit to the crime. This is the Georgia law. The McMicheals did not witness a crime in progress. This means it isn’t a citizens arrest.

 

[N’egger]

>Be me, running
>Chased by 3 white dudes who are armed
>wtf.jpg
>continue running, they try to stop me
>Decided to turn around

Here's the pick your own adventure part

>Shoot them with your AR-15
OR
>Reach for the shotgun and die

>you are known for robbing a neighborhood multiple times in the past and are currently in the commission of another robbery
>people chasing me? WHITE PEOPLE?!
Truly a "wtf.jpg" moment, right?

 

[Dyn]

I'm not considered white by the traditional definition anyway. I'm a spaghetti nigger.

How do you make your pasta e fagioli?

 

[Hyperbolic Steroids]

>you are known for robbing a neighborhood multiple times in the past and are currently in the commission of another robbery
>people chasing me? WHITE PEOPLE?!
Truly a "wtf.jpg" moment, right?

He was just looking at the wares crown molding at the house.

 

[big ups liquid richard]

Aged like milk.

I had the wealth so my parents could pay for it yes.

Never had to work a part time job. Did you?

I’m guessing you did. Congratulations you just admitted to being poorer than me.

So you're a silver spoon trust fund baby who just is coasting on their ancestors laurels. You think you are better than everyone else. People like you are going to get what they deserve.

 

[Lurk McDurk]

I read through the last 20 pages of this thread before my brain couldn't take anymore...

1) Dipshit #3 (video guy) specifically used the word "assist" in his statement about what he was doing leaving his house to join the fray (DUMBASS). He had every opportunity to tell the cop on scene that he wasn't in on this shit and was just trying to see what the commotion was about, but he readily admitted being part of the altercation (DUMBASS)

2) Dipshit #3 (video guy) turned over the video without watching it and making sure it didn't implicate him (DUMBASS)

3) Dipshit #2 (poppa smurf) admitted to being the first one to threaten to shoot (DUMBASS)

4) Dipshit #1 would still be getting his ass kicked if he didn't have that shotgun and another guy with a gun to back him up. He initiated the physical confrontation when the dead jogger tried to go around the truck away from him (DUMBASS)

Hey, I think I'm seeing a pattern here, what's the problem with all of these idiots? The funny thing is, someone said there were trace amounts of weed in the victim's blood but these three dumbasses were high as a kite on rah rah "support the cops, support the troops" bullshit. So high in fact, that they convinced themselves it would be a good idea to chase down a petty thief and put themselves in prison for life.

Maybe they'll get put on the VFW license plate work detail so they can keep "supporting the cops" over beans and cornbread for the rest of their miserable lives. Fucking losers.

 

[mr.moon1488]

I read through the last 20 pages of this thread before my brain couldn't take anymore...

1) Dipshit #3 (video guy) specifically used the word "assist" in his statement about what he was doing leaving his house to join the fray (DUMBASS). He had every opportunity to tell the cop on scene that he wasn't in on this shit and was just trying to see what the commotion was about, but he readily admitted being part of the altercation (DUMBASS)

2) Dipshit #3 (video guy) turned over the video without watching it and making sure it didn't implicate him (DUMBASS)

3) Dipshit #2 (poppa smurf) admitted to being the first one to threaten to shoot (DUMBASS)

4) Dipshit #1 would still be getting his ass kicked if he didn't have that shotgun and another guy with a gun to back him up. He initiated the physical confrontation when the dead jogger tried to go around the truck away from him (DUMBASS)

Hey, I think I'm seeing a pattern here, what's the problem with all of these idiots? The funny thing is, someone said there were trace amounts of weed in the victim's blood but these three dumbasses were high as a kite on rah rah "support the cops, support the troops" bullshit. So high in fact, that they convinced themselves it would be a good idea to chase down a petty thief and put themselves in prison for life.

Maybe they'll get put on the VFW license plate work detail so they can keep "supporting the cops" over beans and cornbread for the rest of their miserable lives. Fucking losers.

Frankly, one thing I'm seeing in common with this and the Rittenhouse trial are arguments that ultimately amount to "it's stupid to take actions to promote a law-abiding society." These arguments obviously lead to some questions that people deliberately try to avoid asking or answering.

Firstly, why is it stupid to try and support a law-abiding society?
The answer to this is always the same which is "you'll be punished by the US government."

The second question that should naturally follow from this but seldom ever does is "why will you be punished by the US government?"
The only logical answer to this question is that the US is a criminal, and thus illegitimate government.

 

[Lurker]

Frankly, one thing I'm seeing in common with this and the Rittenhouse trial are arguments that ultimately amount to "it's stupid to take actions to promote a law-abiding society." These arguments obviously lead to some questions that people deliberately try to avoid asking or answering.

Firstly, why is it stupid to try and support a law-abiding society?
The answer to this is always the same which is "you'll be punished by the US government."

The second question that should naturally follow from this but seldom ever does is "why will you be punished by the US government?"
The only logical answer to this question is that the US is a criminal, and thus illegitimate government.

1. vigilantism is dangerous and can get innocent people killed. you also likely do not know enough about the law to take it into your own hands as a citizen. i realize that apparently cops don't necessarily need to know the law, either, which is troubling, but they at least received training for it, whereas you, a citizen, did not.
2. because when "trying to support a law-abiding society" ends up meaning "chase down and murder black people in your redneck mobile because they were being black while outside", i could see why you would end up punished by the government.

you did it, you discovered the true conspiracy. the US was the criminal the entire time!

 

[mr.moon1488]

1. vigilantism is dangerous and can get innocent people killed. you also likely do not know enough about the law to take it into your own hands as a citizen. i realize that apparently cops don't necessarily need to know the law, either, which is troubling, but they at least received training for it, whereas you, a citizen, did not.
2. because when "trying to support a law-abiding society" ends up meaning "chase down and murder black people in your redneck mobile because they were being black while outside", i could see why you would end up punished by the government.

you did it, you discovered the true conspiracy. the US was the criminal the entire time!

But can vigilantism even exist when the laws are actually enforced? Also, what separates a vigilante from "proper" law enforcement?

More direct to your argument.
>innocent people killed
An innocent person was not killed.
>apparently cops don't necessarily need to know the law, either
Then what really separates them from the common man?
>at least received training for it
Yes, and they go to prison regularly when they use that training to enforce the law
>chase down and murder black people in your redneck mobile because they were being black while outside
That simply wasn't the case here though, and you can prove that it's not in the video that's in the OP of this very thread
>i could see why you would end up punished by the government
Why not punish the person who created this situation to begin with?
>you did it, you discovered the true conspiracy. the US was the criminal the entire time!
Lol that's not really a conspiracy. Democracies are inherently criminal forms of government. They decide legality and morality based on popular opinion which assumes that most people are lawful and moral when unrestrained, which they are not.

Edit:
You're basically arguing that the US legal system should be the ultimate arbiter of the law even when in cases where it, through dereliction of this duty, created the violation of the law that it is now supposed to arbitrate on.

 

[Lurker]

But can vigilantism even exist when the laws are actually enforced? Also, what separates a vigilante from "proper" law enforcement?

More direct to your argument.
>innocent people killed
An innocent person was not killed.
>apparently cops don't necessarily need to know the law, either
Then what really separates them from the common man?
>at least received training for it
Yes, and they go to prison regularly when they use that training to enforce the law
>chase down and murder black people in your redneck mobile because they were being black while outside
That simply wasn't the case here though, and you can prove that it's not in the video that's in the OP of this very thread
>i could see why you would end up punished by the government
Why not punish the person who created this situation to begin with?
>you did it, you discovered the true conspiracy. the US was the criminal the entire time!
Lol that's not really a conspiracy. Democracies are inherently criminal forms of government. They decide legality and morality based on popular opinion which assumes that most people are lawful and moral when unrestrained, which they are not.

what. also, gee, i dunno, the fact that the police are specifically educated and certified to enforce the law, and vigilantes are not. doesn't matter if you were a former cop, you no longer are certified, thus you are a citizen.
- er, no, arbery was definitely innocent in this situation. i know he's black and therefore guilty, but i'm not a racist.
- already answered this
- oftentimes police that go to prison are doing their jobs wrong. some try to claim they are trained in such-and-such way, but usually those people are liars.
- it would seem the courts thought differently, as there is a murdered black man and three retard rednecks in prison.
- you mean the rednecks who chased arbery?
- sure jan

edit: literally wtf are you on about. through what dereliction of duty?

 

[Slimy Time]

This is one of the few cases where I think BLM may have had a point, but they ruined it by deifying Arbery and making it out to be “white supremacy” and not people overstepping their boundaries as citizens. Then again, BLM pretty much ruins everything they touch and make cases like these way more racially charged than they should have been in the first place

BLM could have also made a dynamite point out of the Rittenhouse trial by pointing out all the corrupt and bent shit the prosecution did to try and nail the kid on murder charges, and then argue that what the prosecution does is done behind closed doors. That is something everyone can get behind, a justice system where prosecutors don't get away with the slimy shit displayed in that trial. Instead, they fumble and make it about white privilege that got him off.

Again, for this case they could have made it about citizens arrest and overstepping boundaries as you said. It's Zimmerman gone wrong again, except in this case there were 3 people chasing after one guy armed and it ended with him going for the gun and getting shot for it. Even Zimmerman had the benefit of being punched and having his head slammed repeatedly into concrete before defending himself. Here its pretty hard to empathise with the 3 guys doing the citizens arrest, when there were numerous ways for them to handle it without it going hot.

 

[Neil]

"it's stupid to take actions to promote a law-abiding society."

>break the law to promote a "law abiding society"
buddy i think you just might be on the cusp of realizing why Rittenhouse was charged and why the McMichaels + their accomplice are going to prison for life.

Breaking the law is illegal

 

[mr.moon1488]

what. also, gee, i dunno, the fact that the police are specifically educated and certified to enforce the law, and vigilantes are not. doesn't matter if you were a former cop, you no longer are certified, thus you are a citizen.
- er, no, arbery was definitely innocent in this situation. i know he's black and therefore guilty, but i'm not a racist.
- already answered this
- oftentimes police that go to prison are doing their jobs wrong. some try to claim they are trained in such-and-such way, but usually those people are liars.
- it would seem the courts thought differently, as there is a murdered black man and three retard rednecks in prison.
- you mean the rednecks who chased arbery?
- sure jan

> i know he's black and therefore guilty, but i'm not a racist.
He's guilty because a stolen item literally fell out of his pocket while he was running down the road, and we have video footage of him unlawfully entering a construction site.
>already answered this
>oftentimes police that go to prison are doing their jobs wrong. some try to claim they are trained in such-and-such way, but usually those people are liars.
That's not usually the case though, and it's aside from the point anyway. Society does not want to accept that there are risks involved when apprehending a criminal so it tells the "legitimate" law enforcement to do nothing. When the natural outcome of this is realized, society then attacks those who seek to fill the natural void left behind by this inaction.
>it would seem the courts thought differently, as there is a murdered black man and three retard rednecks in prison.
I don't care what the courts think because they don't care either. Like every other apparatus in the US government, they gauge the political winds and make their decisions on what is justice from there.
>you mean the rednecks who chased arbery?
Once again, can a vigilantly even exist when the law is properly enforced?

 

[Wy4M]

In the cases of Ahmaud Arbery, George Floyd, Jacob Blake and a few others I forgot MSM did an amazing job in turning them into saints.
They also knew the motivations and the verdicts before the facts came out: racism and guilty!
A lesser verdict would not be acceptable because it would be a miscarriage of justice and it would show again how deeply racism is still rooted in society and in the whole justice system. Just look at the chimpout when Kyle was acquitted.

In all these cases MSM turned those 'evil perpetrators' one by one into white supremacists. If you weren't convinced of that or just questioned this then you were part of the problem and probably a white supremacist/racist yourself.

Can somebody please give me any evidence that the McMichaels their motivation was racism? Not the 'they look like rednecks so they probably are'-bullshit but facts.
- An investigator mentioned there was a video of Travis standing above Arbery's body shouting: Damn Nigger! but this video was never shown
during the trial. The investigator also didn't want to repeat that statement under oath. Believe me, if this video exists it would be blasted on MSM 24/24
- The McMichaels mentioned that Arbery was black when they described him. Really? Does that make you a racist?

Also for Chauvin and Rittenhouse, can somebody please show me they were racists? Some footage, social media posts, ...?

Just like MSM is not willing to even show these posts and calls it an incident:

 

[Lurker]

> i know he's black and therefore guilty, but i'm not a racist.
He's guilty because a stolen item literally fell out of his pocket while he was running down the road, and we have video footage of him unlawfully entering a construction site.
>already answered this
>oftentimes police that go to prison are doing their jobs wrong. some try to claim they are trained in such-and-such way, but usually those people are liars.
That's not usually the case though, and it's aside from the point anyway. Society does not want to accept that there are risks involved when apprehending a criminal so it tells the "legitimate" law enforcement to do nothing. When the natural outcome of this is realized, society then attacks those who seek to fill the natural void left behind by this inaction.
>it would seem the courts thought differently, as there is a murdered black man and three retard rednecks in prison.
I don't care what the courts think because they don't care either. Like every other apparatus in the US government, they gauge the political winds and make their decisions on what is justice from there.
>you mean the rednecks who chased arbery?
Once again, can a vigilantly even exist when the law is properly enforced?

- i mean it sounds to me like you're trying to discredit the dead nigger because if he got murdered, he must have had it coming.
- sure, dude
- THE GOVERNMENT IS EVIL REEEE
- *vigilante i don't understand what you are attempting to convey here? are you trying to say that vigilantism and proper law enforcement can't exist at the same time? because even if all laws were enforced, you would still have actual literal retards going out and "trying to catch da bad guys", either in some misguided sense of justice, or because they have ulterior, and often malicious, motives.