Actions speak louder than words, Kyle killed two and a half Jews, he did more to solve the JQ on that day than Spencer ever did in his life.
Jokes aside, I would say I support BLM in that situation too, or at least “I support peoples right to protest against perceived injustice” or so. Give him a break, he’s essentially still just a kid and antifa and bluechecks want to see him dead, does he really have to prove he’s one of us by saying “fuck niggers” on live TV to pour even more gasoline on the fire and endanger himself further?
Actions speak louder than words, Kyle killed two and a half Jews, he did more to solve the JQ on that day than Spencer ever did in his life.
Jokes aside, I would say I support BLM in that situation too, or at least “I support peoples right to protest against perceived injustice” or so. Give him a break, he’s essentially still just a kid and antifa and bluechecks want to see him dead, does he really have to prove he’s one of us by saying “fuck niggers” on live TV to pour even more gasoline on the fire and endanger himself further?
He isn't "one of us." He is just some normie libertarian or maybe cuckservative. By supporting BLM, he is pouring gasoline on the moderate fire and dragging out this culture war. If he would come out and say he was wrong persecuted because he was a white male, that would advance the movement. Any black person or non white in his shoes would easily complain about a "racist" DA. Kyle is a cuck and while I feel bad for his experience, he isn't a true hero. He isn't /ourguy/. He is just some normie caught in the crossfire.
He is just a young man like Sandmann who was persecuted solely for his race and sex. Of course he goes to the side he subconsciously knows is the least anti-white in the US. He's a victim of the system and doesn't know better, that's why he goes the GOP and Fox News.
He is just a young man like Sandmann who was persecuted solely for his race and sex. Of course he goes to the side he subconsciously knows is the least anti-white in the US. He's a victim of the system and doesn't know better, that's why he goes the GOP and Fox News.
Which then grants the Right the massive propaganda win of knowing that kid is not actually bad guy because he's not actually an evil racist. He's a good Catholic, he loves Black people! Those gosh darn crazy liberals are at it again!
And we look like jerkoffs suppporting this charade.
He isn't "one of us." He is just some normie libertarian or maybe cuckservative. By supporting BLM, he is pouring gasoline on the moderate fire and dragging out this culture war. If he would come out and say he was wrong persecuted because he was a white male, that would advance the movement. Any black person or non white in his shoes would easily complain about a "racist" DA. Kyle is a cuck and while I feel bad for his experience, he isn't a true hero. He isn't /ourguy/. He is just some normie caught in the crossfire.
Since the mods took away my ability to edit. Kyle Rittenhouse was attacked by the liberal DA because he was a white male protecting against BLM. For him to go on National TV and say, "I support BLM" and there was "prosecutorial misconduct" misdirects people. By not mentioning race he is ignoring the core issue and selling copium to colorblind moderates. I don't need him to say 1488 but I hold it against him for not saying he was attacked for being white.
Or... it was because he was never that way in the first place and dummies on both sides gave motive and belief to him that he never had.
But anyways, this is Richie the Nazi neo-Roman LARPer's thread. Not Kyle's. So how badly did he fuck up his own defense, besides the usual things. Did he just spend most of his efforts crying out to the snobs to save him rather than argue on 1st Amendment interpretations and prior cases or something?
Since the mods took away my ability to edit. Kyle Rittenhouse was attacked by the liberal DA because he was a white male protecting against BLM. For him to go on National TV and say, "I support BLM" and there was "prosecutorial misconduct" misdirects people. By not mentioning race he is ignoring the core issue and selling copium to colorblind moderates. I don't need him to say 1488 but I hold it against him for not saying he was attacked for being white.
Nobody cares what you hold against anybody, you neet half-white loser. The wignat 'community' is full of the most abject losers in America and anyone who thinks that they (and you in particular) have anything at all to offer to anyone with anything to offer is absolutely delusional. Kyle RIttenhouse isn't going to snuggle up to actual nazis or white supremacists. He hasn't in the past and he won't in the future.
Or... it was because he was never that way in the first place and dummies on both sides gave motive and belief to him that he never had.
But anyways, this is Richie the Nazi neo-Roman LARPer's thread. Not Kyle's. So how badly did he fuck up his own defense, besides the usual things. Did he just spend most of his efforts crying out to the snobs to save him rather than argue on 1st Amendment interpretations and prior cases or something?
I can find twitter posts of people calling him a white supremacist. People went after him because he was a white male standing up against black lives matter.
Nobody cares what you hold against anybody, you neet half-white loser. The wignat 'community' is full of the most abject losers in America and anyone who thinks that they (and you in particular) have anything at all to offer to anyone with anything to offer is absolutely delusional. Kyle RIttenhouse isn't going to snuggle up to actual nazis or white supremacists. He hasn't in the past and he won't in the future.
I didn't say he needs to become a neo-nazi or even white supremacist, just admit that he was attacked for being white. The fact that felt comfortable killing 3 people while being afraid to speak about his race (or half race) says everything about this situation, It's harder to say that whites are under attack and are being mistreated than it is to kill people in the street.
According to Kessler, Dickie Spencer either intentionally or through sheer incompetence sabotaged the trial during jury selection. I still don't get how he has fan boys when his judgment is so bad.
According to Kessler, Dickie Spencer either intentionally or through sheer incompetence sabotaged the trial during jury selection. I still don't get how he has fan boys when his judgment is so bad.
If this is true, I can't tell which scenario is more likely: Spencer being a moron, or Spencer deliberately throwing the trial so he can not only get back at the other defendants he has a grudge against but also so he can continue playing victim about how persecuted he is.
If this is true, I can't tell which scenario is more likely: Spencer being a moron, or Spencer deliberately throwing the trial so he can not only get back at the other defendants he has a grudge against but also so he can continue playing victim about how persecuted he is.
He isn't "one of us." He is just some normie libertarian or maybe cuckservative. By supporting BLM, he is pouring gasoline on the moderate fire and dragging out this culture war. If he would come out and say he was wrong persecuted because he was a white male, that would advance the movement. Any black person or non white in his shoes would easily complain about a "racist" DA. Kyle is a cuck and while I feel bad for his experience, he isn't a true hero. He isn't /ourguy/. He is just some normie caught in the crossfire.
According to Kessler, Dickie Spencer either intentionally or through sheer incompetence sabotaged the trial during jury selection. I still don't get how he has fan boys when his judgment is so bad.
Oh wow. You're supposed to dismiss jurists who you think might actually not give fair decisions due to certain details you pick up. This stupid asshole on the other hand chose to babble liberal talking points online to beg for the elites to take him back in, he's one of them! Don't treat him like a dirty poor and send him to prison!
He was more focused on trying to go "senile man good" to rebuild a bridge he fucking can't due to losing the material needed when he did his Nazi LARP than he was trying to make sure he had a jury that could maybe ensure he's not nailed to the wall.
If this is true, I can't tell which scenario is more likely: Spencer being a moron, or Spencer deliberately throwing the trial so he can not only get back at the other defendants he has a grudge against but also so he can continue playing victim about how persecuted he is.
If he nuked his own finances, especially since it seems like he got cut off from his trust funds when he did this Nazi LARP shit, just to spite a couple of other guys then holy shit.
I think he just thought he was entitled to special treatment and thought appealing to the elites and social clubs he burned his bridges with online might magically make this go away myself.
Oh wow. You're supposed to dismiss jurists who you think might actually not give fair decisions due to certain details you pick up. This stupid asshole on the other hand chose to babble liberal talking points online to beg for the elites to take him back in, he's one of them! Don't treat him like a dirty poor and send him to prison!
All of Spencer's elite and liberal simp posts are hilarious because it shows that Spencer doesn't understand what attracted media attention to him. Spencer, if you have been setup as an evil neo-nazi and paraded around television as such why would the elites want you getting behind their causes? You are meant to serve as a detriment to causes or people that they view as a threat to their interests. Getting behind people and causes that they want doesn't benefit them.
He was expecting that pandering to them would make them want to save him. His simp posts probably did more to turn the elites against him because now he wasn't doing what they want him to do.
He isn't "one of us." He is just some normie libertarian or maybe cuckservative. By supporting BLM, he is pouring gasoline on the moderate fire and dragging out this culture war. If he would come out and say he was wrong persecuted because he was a white male, that would advance the movement. Any black person or non white in his shoes would easily complain about a "racist" DA. Kyle is a cuck and while I feel bad for his experience, he isn't a true hero. He isn't /ourguy/. He is just some normie caught in the crossfire.
And isn’t it Spencer’s responsibility as the intellectual vanguard of the identitarian movement to uplift whites like Kyle - who have seen ZOG laid bare but don’t entirely understand the power structure - to a higher plane of racial awareness? Spencer has failed in every way to do this.
Charlottesville was just some delusional retards thinking that Trump was literally Hitler, and that they suddenly had some institutional backing. They were big enough fools to believe all the lies used car salesman Donald told them. Every time Hitler 2 failed them, they just formulated copes and adjusted their world views accordingly. The lack of understanding of how politics work was their downfall.
The torchlight parade looked pretty cool IMO. The high water mark of a movement that almost happened except we fell into an elaborate merchant devised trap.
I actually agree that Spencer is toxic, in the true sense. I fully agree. Though I do like him somewhat based on his debate with Sargon and other certain moments he's had. I actually do kind of get why people bash him now.
That said I do still ultimately have to stand on the side of Spencer in this trial. It's hard to do, because it's a complicated situation given all the confusing factors at play.
But if you zoom out and just disregard the people involved and see the case in purely abstract sense, this trial is essentially "Should people who are Racist, White Nationalist, or Neo-Nazi be extended less rights by a jury than others"
They're trying to set a moral precedent. That matters even if you despise Spencer for whatever reason. You need to realize that you could be tomorrow's Spencer. That's why they do this. They want to set a precedent that if you have the wrong ideas about race, white identity, or "muh Nazis" or anything like that, that the justice system can deny you a fair trial and openly treat you with total disregard for your rights as a citizen. That's extremely dangerous and it seems very likely that this trial will successfully set that precedent.
That's why I'm not joining the point and laugh at Spencer thing. This isn't fucking about Spencer. The right wing has a real issue where it's basically terrified and ashamed of daring to defend its "extreme" side. The left doesn't shy down from defending literal pedophiles and terrorist communists. But the right wing shies away from getting dirty by having to defend "muh neonazis."
Then right wingers or conservatives tell themselves that the reason they're not defending "muh neonazi" is because said neonazi is a fed, or a bad person, or a glowie. The reality is that said conservatives and right wingers are psychologically and politically repressed by the social apparatus and moral system of the current regime.
It's a pretty big uphill battle to defend these guys. Just the cold reality of the situation. Still, we shouldn't normalize the idea that we needn't defend such people in these situations. The right wing needs to have a broader sense of moral duty to recognize that these things are not about our personal relationships and details along those lines. I fucking despise Heimbach and always have. It's absolutely not about that.
The question is this: Why would we cede even an inch of territory to the enemy, ever? Fuck the enemy. Fuck antifa. I say these men are innocent. I dont give a fuck if saying that makes me a "nazi sympathizer" or something. Maybe I myself am a White Supremacist Racist Nazi. Oh no, not that! Anything but that! Commie, child rapist, Bolshevik, pedophile, murderer... but not White Supremacist Racist Nazi!
I sometimes think you could really just do a skit about these people fighting some kind of extremely brutal, genocidal war basically all stopping fighting and then unanimously joining together to "kill a neoNazi" like Spencer. It's like a Hollywood trope kind of thing you see a lot. Pulp Fiction, even Falling Down has a similar scene. It's in thousands of films, probably. The message is basically that whenever racism or Nazis enter the film, the normal rules of morality and narrative break down completely. Suddenly the audience, the main characters, and even the villain of the film who may be a mass murdering child rapist, all somehow become unanimous moral allies and then murder or obliterate the "racist" or the "white supremacist Nazi" from the film. This is modern religious indoctrination essentially programming the population to equate "White Racism" with "Pure Evil" or "Satanic Evil" in the same way that old religions might have done. There is nothing more morally abhorrent, more untouchable, more taboo, more Evil and Demonic, than white racism. It is this long term brainwashing that has resulted in the modern world and these kinds of situations.
A lot of us have a shame-response that tells us you can't even consider defending "neo-nazis" or "white racists." You're supposed to grovel. You're supposed to feel bad. You're supposed to shamefully and submissively let the Jew destroy whatever and whichever neo-nazi she decides must be destroyed on the altar of sacrifice. Well fuck that. Fuck their shame. I don't answer to leftist moral principles. I don't subscribe to the leftist moral order. That moral order is destroying everything I love. That moral order has caused my own personal life untold misery and pain that should never have happened. These are the people fucking the world up.
So no, I don't feel any shame. You don't disproportionally and unfairly punish or assault somebody because they're racist or a skinhead. It's not complicated. It's easy to understand. Reject leftist moral shame that is used to drive you into psychological and political submission. There's no other way to win.
See, the only thing with this attitude is that knowing the level and length of deep cultural conditioning/brainwashing that permeates across just about all of the population/politics of this nation, and every eceleb party involved was very much more aware of it than most, why would they throw all pragmatism and best chances for success away, by openly embracing or associating with irl in public the very actions and aesthetics that they know would trigger the very extreme "you get btfo'ed" reactions they all had talked about years prior leading to the rally/protest? And it would've been fine if talking about these things in a theoretical way, and discussing their validity as tools towards achieving their so-called ends, had been the limit to where they took things publicly. And that's not the only extremely blindly suicidal aspect of it either, there was also the fact of how'd they'd talk about how evil n ruthless the actual Zog political apparatus and it's media is in those same years prior, and how that media would only give positive/beneficial coverage to protests and rallies for issues they endorsed. What was there for them to ever even gain politically by doing these "street activism" events? Why did they suddenly forget all the long talks about how evil, conniving, capable and willing to trap n fuck over innocents the Zog powers that be are?
Also, sooo many more normies these days are actually close to our wavelength after 2020 and Rittenhouse, just think of how much more/many there could be without the obviously bad characters and morons amongst the grift-right poisoning wells and providing justifications all this time
