Cronut
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2021
Fuentes has lost so much clout that he's no longer the biggest dog in the yard. A year ago he would have said Doyle is a cucked zionist and that heck of comie is cringe (which it is). But he can't do that anymore cause hes not the biggest (((optical))) right winger anymore and wouldn't win a war against Doyles better reputation and bigger audience. So now he has to pretend that he likes Doyle just as he pretends to like Ethan Ralph. Pathetic display from Nick "the knife" Fuentes.
The response to being called out as inferior by John Doyle's fans is as telling as could be that the AF movement with young right wingers is over. I thought they lived for online drama and it's so fun? When AF went against wignats they didn't care about stopping infighting, till this day they dont' care. Nick built his brand by the division he caused with the alt-right, he publically states he loves the online drama. But as AF crumbles, him and his remaining lackies beg for unity and "stop sowing division", and "Let Fuentes be Fuentes, let Doyle be Doyle" lmao. Whilst Nick cries that his talking points are being stolen (lol) it's as plain as day that the AF movement is haemorrhaging followers and influence, hence the need to protect what's left from the heir apparent.
Such a good time to change his tune, where was this rhetoric previously with Spencer or those who wanted to leave AF amicably like Casey? Right. The fact is Nick is an idiot with decent speaking skills, who didn't understand what the optics position he pushed means in practice and was forced to change his tune once he failed, and yet now wants to use being banned off everything as "well actually" a good thing. Who would have known the SPLC wasn't going to fall for "it was just a joke bro" strategy. From Tucker to the GOP everyone knows Nick had said enough to be unsalvageable. Now that someone else understands what sacrifices you would have to make in rhetoric to play an optics position, and the limits that place you in, he wants extra brownie points for 'naming them'.
He wants credit for 'naming them' so that he can tell everyone their best choice is to vote for the president so owned by Israel he publically cries that Israel doesn't have enough power over America right now. I don't watch Doyle but Im sure he has a similar position that you have to get Trump back in power - so in the end what exactly is the point of saying "well I name them", pushing an extreme anti-women agenda, even to the point that little girls are being killed and all your side sees it as is something to mock, going to achieve? oh but you name them!!! then tell your audience to go vote for the person who would empower them the most. Based!
AF is literally nothing more than the right-wing version of the shit-lib AOC left movement. Extreme, divisive rhetoric just to channel people on the far right back to voting for some representative in a mainstream party. Just they have even less to show for it. And if that's what your going to do, then what value does AF have over Doyle's movement which is actually succeeding in the optics space instead? hence the sudden pleading for 'unity'. pathetic