Science More women are giving birth after uterus transplants — and experts say they could even be put in men


When Chelsea Jovanovich was 15, she learned that she didn't have a uterus.

That was a result of her having Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) Syndrome, a rare congenital disorder that is estimated to occur in 1 in every 4,500 females. Such a diagnosis meant she'd never be able to carry a pregnancy on her own; her only options would be adoption or surrogacy. Jovanovich said it wasn't until she got married and started thinking about having a family of her own that really came to terms with the reality of not having a uterus and started to investigate other options. Jovanovich and her husband, Jake, considered a gestational carriers. They even approached a close friend about it, but ultimately realized the arrangement likely wouldn't work.

"It was a lot harder on me emotionally as I got into my child-bearing years," Jovanovich said. "Your friends are having babies, and you can't. It was pretty hard and I went through some rough patches."

Nearly out of options, Jovanovich learned about the possibility of a uterus transplant, which is when a person receives a uterus transplant from a living or deceased donor. The surgery of a transplant from a living person remains rare and is still in early clinical trial stages; to date, only 20 have been performed in the United States as of April 2021. Fifty had been performed around the world through April 2019.

Unphased by the experimental nature of the surgery, Jovanovich decided to try her luck, and applied to Penn Medicine's Uterus Donation program which began in 2017. To her surprise, she was accepted and matched with a donor. In February 2020, she successfully received a uterus from a woman named Cheryl Cichonski-Urban, who had already given birth to two healthy babies. After a successful transplant, Jovanovich underwent in vitro fertilization. In a uterus transplant, the fallopian tubes of the donor are part of transplantation— and it all paid off. On May 18, 2021, Jovanovich gave birth via a C-section to a healthy baby boy thanks to Urban's uterus.

Her son, Telden, was the first baby to be born from a live donor at the Penn State program. Of the 70 uterus transplants that have ever occurred globally, only a handful of babies have been born from both living and deceased donors. Despite the rarity of the procedure now, it could be a process that becomes more common in the future for women who have Uterine Factor Infertility (UFI), which is a form of female infertility that affects as many as 5 percent of reproductive-aged women worldwide. Those with UFI cannot get pregnant because, like Jovanovich, they either lack uteri or their uterus doesn't function properly.

"[A] uterus transplant is the only option that allows women with UFI the opportunity to carry and deliver their own babies," said Kathleen E. O'Neill, MD, MTR, co-principal investigator of Penn Medicine's Uterus Transplantation for Uterine Factor Infertility (UNTIL) trial. "Women with UFI have limited pathways to parenthood."

Dr. Aimee Eyvazzadeh, a reproductive endocrinologist based in the San Francisco Bay Area, told Salon despite recent successes, the world is likely still "far away" from a uterus transplant to be offered as an option at a fertility clinic.

"It's cost-prohibitive and most people won't have the funds to pay out of pocket for a uterine transplant," Eyvazzadeh said. "Given the risks associated with transplants, I don't see fertility clinics adopting this as a new procedure they will offer; it's a high risk procedure with a lower rate of live birth compared to IVF with a gestational carrier with a much higher cost."

Indeed, uterus transplants are costly because they are long and invasive processes that can require around 100 medical professionals (as happened with Jovanovich's transplant). If a transplant is successful and the recipient gives birth, the uterus is removed after child-bearing is complete. Doctors estimate a uterus transplant would cost up to $200,000, and are not apt to be covered by insurance — and then there are the risks to consider. As with many organ transplants, the recipient must take immunosuppressive medications to help the body accept the new organ, which can cause diabetes or renal damage in the long-term. There is also no guarantee that such a transplant will lead to a successful pregnancy.

"Graft failure is also a complication of uterine transplants," Eyvazzadeh said. "A little less than one-third experience graft failure; the transplant doesn't 'take' in a little less than a third of transplant recipients."

Eyvazzadeh said she was basing this number on a study published in February, 2021, in the peer-reviewed journal Obstetrics & Gynecology. In 2019, the Washington Post reported on one woman's journey to getting a uterus transplant who nearly died from a life-threatening Candida infection. It turned out that the uterus implanted in her body came from a Candida infection in her donor's bladder.

Eyvazzadeh added that the risks and cost do not mean the transplant won't become a more common operation in the future. Surprisingly, she thinks uterus transplants could become an option for an unexpected population: men.

"I predict with our aging population, and the rise of infertility, we will need men to share the burden of growing our population," Eyvazzadeh said. "While some people may think this is far-fetched, it is not for the near future; I predict in maybe 200 years from now, it will be a reality."

Transgender female patients will also be another group of people to benefit from the research into uterus transplants.

"Transgender females are also good candidates," Eyvazzadeh said. "I am not aware of a transgender female having a uterine transplant yet."

Indeed, many doctors believe a uterus transplant could work for a transgender woman.

However, as with most surgeries and procedures that involve a uterus, Eyvazzadeh said to "absolutely" expect many future debates.

"Anytime a treatment involves a woman's uterus, there will definitely be a debate especially when it involves IVF," Eyvazzadeh said. "As with all new technology, they will get safer and more effective and ultimately more cost effective."
 
I'm all for this. Once enough men start shitting out their organs and dying in the middle of the street because their body actively rejects this new foreign, very much incompatible body implanted in them, people might start to wonder if biology does, in fact, real.

Unfortunately, I don't see people coming to that realization without a horrific spectacle shocking them out of their stupor. The first (and only) brave transwomxn to turn their lower halves into the Ouroboros from Resident Evil 4 will be doing a service to the rest of humanity by reminding them why we don't play God, and for that, we salute them :semperfidelis:
 
“We need to fix this birth rate issue!”
>stop putting garbage in everyone’s bodies
>fix the catastrophe that is worsening pair bonding culture
>fix the steady strangling of wages so people can afford to have kids without considering it the end of comfortable living
>stop attempting to disenfranchise conservative Americans, one of the only groups still trying to have them in the first place

“I’ve got it! Crimes against nature!”
 
Transgender female patients will also be another group of people to benefit from the research into uterus transplants.

"Transgender females are also good candidates," Eyvazzadeh said. "I am not aware of a transgender female having a uterine transplant yet."

If this comes to pass I will no longer be an organ donor. I don't want my uterus going into some troon who will likely just die of a massive infection because male bodies are not meant to carry female organs. Miscarriages that cannot be expelled without surgery are likely to kill off a few troons if pregnancy is even possible in the first place.
 
If this comes to pass I will no longer be an organ donor. I don't want my uterus going into some troon who will likely just die of a massive infection because male bodies are not meant to carry female organs. Miscarriages that cannot be expelled without surgery are likely to kill off a few troons if pregnancy is even possible in the first place.
Think about it though- you will be responsible for taking one out?
I might sign up AS an organ donor because of this.
 
I'm all for this. Once enough men start shitting out their organs and dying in the middle of the street because their body actively rejects this new foreign, very much incompatible body implanted in them, people might start to wonder if biology does, in fact, real.
I wouldn't count on it. Look up the history of gender-delusions.
They've been killing insane faggots on the operating table for nearly a hundred years, and are none the wiser.
 
LMAO more troon uterus horseshit. You can't put a foreign organ into a mans body and expect it to work. That's absolutely insane. You also can't force this foreign organ to work.

Everyone who thinks this is going to happen and/or is scared of this happening is absolutely delusional. You know nothing about how pregnancy and the human body works and that's really embarassing.

Don't get fooled by the mad screechings of troons and their r.etarded supporters. "Hurr durr trans women totally could get pregnant soon!!1"
No, they can't and just because some braindead troon loving "scientist" or activist says it still doesn't make it true. Quite the opposite, everything these people say should be disregarded because it's just troon cult bullshit.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't count on it. Look up the history of gender-delusions.
They've been killing insane faggots on the operating table for nearly a hundred years, and are none the wiser.
Actually, the last time they tried this was in Weimar Germany (surprise!) and it had the effect of scaring everyone away from the tranny death cult for a good 90 years. "Her" name was Lili Elbe, and he got a uterus transplant in 1931 and died a horrific, very public death almost immediately afterward. It only took two years after that for Germany to go on a tranny-slaying crusade and transexuality was taboo the world over until just a decade or so ago.

People can swallow a lot of bullshit, but when celebrities are eaten alive from the inside by Frankensteinian experiments, the public starts to notice that something isn't quite right.

Then again, Jazz Jennings had his amhole explode on live TV and then turned into the world's transgender first human-potato hybrid and nobody cared, so it's entirely possible we're past the point of no return.
 
I'm all for it - this is the only "ethical" way to see just how far we can push the body while expanding our knowledge base. After all you learn more from mistakes and failures than you do successes.

Plus I grew up with gore.com and such - people dying horribly as flesh, blood, and offal go everywhere is nostalgic as fuck for me.
 

FFPFtlqWYAIT0j8.jpgdd.png
 
Actually, the last time they tried this was in Weimar Germany (surprise!)
Oh, I'm aware of the "progressive pioneers" like Hirschfeld, Levy-Lenz, Kronfeld, Schapiro, Fleischmann - the inventors of concepts such as "gender transition".

It only took two years after that for Germany to go on a tranny-slaying crusade and transexuality was taboo the world over until just a decade or so ago.
The jew will tell you that the Nazis burned his books, but he'll never tell you why...
 
Look, I'm not an expert, especially not in biology. But from what I can tell about the human body, from being in one for quite a while, is a lot of functions are built in and just known by the every part of it. One reason trans women will never be women is because the brain/body sees your nouveau vagina as a gaping wound between your legs and does everything it can to close it up. So following this line of thinking, okay, let's just put a womb inside a male body. What plumbing are you going to hook it up to? How are you going to tell the naturally occuring male body and hormones that it is not a foreign object that needs to be removed? Even if you were to implant an embryo in the womb, how would you convince the body to pass nutrients to the womb to feed the "clump of cells"? Hell, our "medical science" can't even fix an organ that suffers from situs inverses; if someone has a reversed organ, you can't put a normal one in there, because valves and connectors and shit don't line up; and that's for organs that can be successfully transplanted.

Do explain Mr. Butcher Doctor.
 
Breakthroughs in uterus transplant technology are amazing, and could offer some women who suffer from defects or impairments the opportunity to restore bodily function and give birth like they want to.

But if only there was some way to take this good news for women and make it about men in dresses...
:thinking:
 
I'm all for this. Once enough men start shitting out their organs and dying in the middle of the street because their body actively rejects this new foreign, very much incompatible body implanted in them, people might start to wonder if biology does, in fact, real.

Unfortunately, I don't see people coming to that realization without a horrific spectacle shocking them out of their stupor. The first (and only) brave transwomxn to turn their lower halves into the Ouroboros from Resident Evil 4 will be doing a service to the rest of humanity by reminding them why we don't play God, and for that, we salute them :semperfidelis:
Thats resident evil 5 you faggot
 
If this comes to pass I will no longer be an organ donor. I don't want my uterus going into some troon who will likely just die of a massive infection because male bodies are not meant to carry female organs. Miscarriages that cannot be expelled without surgery are likely to kill off a few troons if pregnancy is even possible in the first place.
Rig a bomb in there, MGS5 style.
 
Back