- Joined
- Nov 25, 2021
Last edited:
Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big
- Thread starter JosephStalin
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
The picture that annoyed me. It's not even particularly egregious, so maybe I'm just in a bit of a sour mood this morning. Don't sleep so great many days nowadays.
Same energy.
As for Nick Triggly poof, I'm pretty sure they brought him to make Laura "breed me daddy EU" Kuenssberg look better in comparison.
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2018
1. When in the last decade has the federal government ever cared about deficit spending?
2. You're severely underestimating how much money there is to be made in geriatrics.
3. The ensuing panic, and vitriol that would occur after millions of families get their grandparents dumped on them out of nowhere would light a fire under Bidens geriatric ass that even he couldn't sleep through.
Billy Beer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2021
The BBC fall over themselves to show pictures of non-whites in 'modern Britain'.
The 'Standard family xmas' pics, where it's a table of wogs, always makes me laugh. We dem pas di wartermelon? (Sorry, that is very racist and I mean no harm, ill-will or offense to my fellow Britains, regardless of skin colour)
The 'Standard family xmas' pics, where it's a table of wogs, always makes me laugh. We dem pas di wartermelon? (Sorry, that is very racist and I mean no harm, ill-will or offense to my fellow Britains, regardless of skin colour)
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2021
Geriatrics don't benefit the government directly, so the government doesn't care. The taxation they get from pharmaceuticals isn't enough to offset the drain from old-age pensions and medic-aid. You have also failed to acknowledge the situation. Old people aren't being sent to their families. But COVID and vaccines allow hospitals, tard homes, and seniors facilities to lower the number of staff they have on hand, lowering the expenses related to staffing while ensuring funding remains the same.
Random Internet Person
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
Seeing this spread along the right wing circles. 
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2020
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
This cult behaviour is the inevitable result of ideological echo-chambering and purity spiralling. It could almost be a textbook example of how to create a cadre of unthinkingly loyal footsoldiers for the state, who will carry out any number of atrocities for the promise of a temporary reprieve from the madness they've embedded themselves in. Twitter is just the modern vienna coffee shop.
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2021
You should have listened to the Hot Rod. They teach you about peer-pressure and drugs in Kindergarten. Just like a drug addict, you have no excuse.
Attachments
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2021
Something, something, racist 50s mentality. What good is a Thermos that can survive a nuclear war if niggers don't know their fathers?
Meriasek
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
Well, he died for his brothers. Apparently, his brain didn't get memo about his resurrection.
/edit: Did anyone else notice that quite suddenly people are all about how the vaccine targets a lot of different elements of the spike protein, so that mutations there don't really hinder its efficiency all that much? I never saw anyone really talk about that, but suddenly a lot of people have the same talking points of how the vaccine works and how it's still gonna be efficient or how the booster is still gonna be efficient.
Last edited:
No one was talking about that because it wasn't a thing until about 5 minutes ago when I saw you mention. Do you have some examples?
The vaccines cause a subset of the spike protein to be produced. It's a part of a part of the whole virus. They've made it that way because they were shit scared of ADE prior to making the vaccines. If people are saying this it's purely a cope.
My theory is that they ultimately won't produce an update to the current vaccines as there's no point. If OAS is established in the vaccinated that's all she wrote in terms of immunity to Covid. Giving them a tweaked vaccine will make no difference as they'll still produce the same S-proteins as the original.
I think they're evaluating the Omicron variant to sus out whether it's less or more virulent than Delta Covid. If it's less or the same there's not much to worry about, they'll continue to pretend that the vaccines work against it and things will go on as previous. If it's a lot more virulent, or it starts showing much higher CFRs in the vaccinated, they have a big fucking problem on their hands.
So far there's been talk that it's fairly mild. But also talk that it's way less infectious than Delta (which doesn't make any sense if it's replaced Delta in Southern Africa) or way more infectious. So the usual blizzard of nonsense. It's being picked up all over the world now so we'll know soon enough how it behaves in heavily vaccinated populations.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2018
Holy fucking shit, I love this. And you. This is the perfect rebuttal to the fucking spastics who have yet to find, install, and use their spines.
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2018
You clearly didn't understand the underlying implications of my original post. Once staff:patient ratio hits a certain threshold a facility has to shut down, and off load its patients to another facility. There are already a durth of rooms in long term care facilities to begin with, and any empty rooms are often vacant because it's no longer feasible to place a resident into said room due to staffing shortages. Removing a significant portion of employees will only compound the issue leading to more resignations due to burnout, thus draining the workforce even more than one would've initially presumed. Most facilities are already filled to capacity, maybe an area could sustain one facility shuttering without sending residents to their families homes, but for the majority of areas if any more than 1 closed due to lack of staffing there wouldn't be near enough rooms for those residents in other homes. Keeping facilities afloat by staffing them with national guardsmen is not a sustainable method, and if that's already being implemented before a potential mass exodus by staff... I think the ramifications are obvious.
Staffing shortages are not a good thing for anyone involved, especially corporate fags. Staffing shortages lead to unnecessary incidents, unnecessary incidents lead to lawsuits and state fines. A singular state fine can easily exceed the yearly average salary of a cna by 2-3x. Now tell me does it make sense to cut back on staff to "cost cut" just to pay out the ass in law courts and state inspections? Lawsuits are even worse, and guess what Its such a lucrative field that they have targeted adverstisment just for it! In fact I can almost guarantee you that if you turn on the tv sometime between the hours of 8am and 5pm you'll see an absurd number of these ads. Staffing shortages also lead to overtime, monetary compensation in the form of double, triple, and in some cases quadruple time to get people in the building, increased wages to retain employees, and even sign on bonuses of thousands of dollars just to drum up interest in your open positions.
Again in what world does the government care about deficit spending? Are you purposefully playing coy about the rampant corruption in government? Do you really not know how intimately connected the pharmaceutical lobbies are with our politicians? Can you really not make the connection in your mind between the medical industry taking massive financial losses and politicians pocketbooks being affected?
That brings up another point, regardless of whether residents ended up in incredibly understaffed facilities, or were sent to live with family members there would be a marked uptick in mortality among that demographic. The pharmaceutical companies cash cow is geriatrics, if anything were to potentially impact this market negatively it would be in their best interest to mitigate or eliminate it.
Edit: forgot to mention the fact that the faggy vaccine mandate also applies to ALL staff working in hospitals and long term care facilities. This includes maintenance, kitchen, laundry, etc.... A bulk of kitchen and laundry staff are made up of minorities, and the less "educated", the demographics least likely to comply with the mandate. With the Osha mandate seemingly DOA this leaves them free to look for any other jobs in the area without worry of a mandate. If kitchen staff leave then no one eats, nursing staff could potentially compensate if they were fully staffed, however that's already not the case in 90% of facilities, and again I reiterate this is before the mandate has gone into effect.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 4, 2021
@The handsome tard
I would say both, without any hint of irony. We have out of touch megalomaniacs with cartoonishly huge ambitions but they outsource the execution to actual boomers who shit their pants and have no idea where they are. It's the worst of both worlds.
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2021
You assume we're still living under Rule of Law.
All it takes is for an executive to send a letter and a $1000 donation to the appropriate politico's re-election fund, and all of a sudden care homes are no longer culpable for any incident that occurs. Suddenly staff to client ratios are re-calculated.
Geriatrics, as evidenced by current vaccine efficacy rates, have been replaced with working-aged goyim and children. Why do you think Fauci is pushing for injections for 6mo infants by the end of next year? Big Pharma has found a way to profitize the general public. Old people aren't needed any more. And making all those drugs for old people eats up space that can be used for vaccine production.
You also act like to government isn't above telling people to lower their expectations. If the government and their whore media are willing to tell healthy, working people that they demand too much by expecting there to be food on store shelves, you can be damn sure they're willing to tell you to just "suck it up" that your elderly family member was boiled alive or served unsafe food. If they're willing to delay and reschedule life-saving procedures for tax-payers, they won't think twice about snuffing out tax-eaters.
Remember that time the governor of NY State send young people with COVID into senior care facilities, and all the old people died?
With a bunch of vaccinated people unemployed by closing senior care, and janitors and cooks in high demand at hospitals, sure sounds like that problem solves itself.
Last edited:
Shroom King
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2014
Maybe that guy should Learn To Code
?Fuck that, the British Empire is by white people, for white people. Close the fucking borders.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2021
If 6% of the vulnerable population dies, and only 5% of population is vulnarable that means the 0,3% of population will die. Probably yearly, so take a excel sheet and simulate ten years of reducing population by 0,3%. And in no counteraction we will have a giant bio-labratory producing new variations of virus.
Also as a bonus we have people that recover, but no in full health. All pulmonology sickness can have a permanent effects like smaller effectivness of breathing or so, COVID-19 also have nice effects like "brain fog" for not-so-small percentage of recovered people. And this is main concern with pandemic: long term health effects on population, not the death factor. TBH, even if 20% of population dies it will probably not be something that will be more than a short note in historical books, but a common disease (common like flu or something) which will grant a fraction of population life-time standing effects on hearth or mental health will be something that isn't to be ignored.
Many people when think about a "serious virus" have in mind a pop-cultural shit like Captain Trips from The Stand - erm, NO, any virus like that will ever spread. If a virus quickly kills a person that his range will be small and disease will be very quickly wiped out or limited (you need time to gave a virus to others, so if you die quickly you will not spread it to many persons). That is the true danger from viruses like HIV or COVID-19 - their effects aren't visable for a long time.
And also yes, mass-vaccination will be resulting in death of some unlucky guys. But the point is, that vaccination for most diseases is less destructive than freely spreading disease. If in one hand government body have letting to die perspectively like 1-3% of population in long standing epidemic and have to deal with long-term effects in other 10-15% percent of it OR take some serious actions (like mass-vacination) and have the death ratio like 0,1-0,5% of population with less than 5% population with long-standing effects the choice is obvious. In theory, in reality they have unpredictable effects of disease and predictable effects of vaccination. In some way, sometimes they have a black swan to deal with (in both ways: COVID-19 have a lot smaller effects in populations, that have been using in past old good vaccine BCG against tuberculosis).
Thats just math, not a moral-fag "person have a freedom to something". And was always math.
(And if someone is curious - yes, I taked Astra Zeneca vaccine in full half year ago. Any side effects - and I choose AZ not Pfizer because it was less likely to give side effects in long term in my opinion. And yes, I'm wearing masks now - in the start with COVID-19 in my city it was against COVID-19, now because I just realized that I didn't have any infections from the start of mask action, even stupid cold so fuck it, I only regead that I didn't wear it in past just to avoid colds).
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2021
Personally im a fag and I love to suck thicc spike proteins
Meriasek
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
It's mostly randos who spout that if you ask what the booster is supposed to do if it uses the same spike protein. Usually they start with just "The keyword is polyclonal antibodies" and hope you go away, then use super simplified pictures to avoid having to talk any more complicated things.
- Status