Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
Fast travel disabled
transgiving1.PNGtransgiving2.PNGtransgiving3.PNG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Horrifying
  • Winner
Reactions: not william stenchever, 6thRanger, Strange Looking Dog and 6 others
the clap said:
They're directly brought up in this debate by ActualJake and Destiny:


The debate is interesting, I felt bad for Tiny because the corn guy just couldn't define his terms. I don't know if its because he was dishonest, retarded, or some soybastard mix of the two.
Click to expand...
God that corn guy is loaded with Soy, seems intimated by Destiny as well. His bullshit basically boils down to "don't be mean on the internet" which is super ironic because skimming through the backstory of this guy because he has a bunch of tweets not only being "mean" on the internet, but literally advocating violence lmao.
m1qx38koae281.jpg
Soys gonna soy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Gaylord Brachiosaurus, SandyCat, Lobster Cult High Priest and 3 others
Novalife said:
God that corn guy is loaded with Soy, seems intimated by Destiny as well. His bullshit basically boils down to "don't be mean on the internet" which is super ironic because skimming through the backstory of this guy because he has a bunch of tweets not only being "mean" on the internet, but literally advocating violence lmao.

Soys gonna soy.
Click to expand...
Apparently Hasan is a saint according to cornholio
 
  • Lunacy
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Woke Blue Muttlema, Lobster Cult High Priest and Scarmaiden
This debate was 200 IQ redditor vs Discord Pedophile. I would watch more, but the levels of cope coming from corn man were off the charts. Between being stuck in a gimmick costume while Tiny has a parent-child dialogue with him and the attempt at disaffected smugness, it felt like a bad dream.

I am looking forward to Destiny's continued defense of trannies as their construction of the world crumbles worse and worse. As a coomer, he's inclined to protect them. But one can only wonder how many Does and It/Its he can take- especially when all of them immediately go for the throat.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Guntkvd, 6thRanger, CheetoDust and 2 others
the clap said:
They're directly brought up in this debate by ActualJake and Destiny:


The debate is interesting, I felt bad for Tiny because the corn guy just couldn't define his terms. I don't know if its because he was dishonest, retarded, or some soybastard mix of the two.
Click to expand...
I don't think anything highlights the state of online politics more than a video of a heated argument with a communist dressed as corn.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: not william stenchever, 6thRanger, Tzeentch and 7 others
Noom Boom said:
This is what is holding me back. I find no benefit to treating people differently either interpersonally or through government policy by their race. We are a diverse country and will continue to be, so when looking at problems like murder or something the question is, how do we proceed? We cannot have different laws based on race. We can only address "soft" factors like culture and socioeconomic conditions, and that could affect multiple races.

So what is really the benefit of calling yourself a race realist and arguing for it?
Click to expand...
Well for one, I don't think we'd be discriminating against Asians and Whites when it comes to college selection if it was just common knowledge that some races have lower IQ's so it's not racism that's keeping them from getting into college. I feel like seeing the reality of the situation would change how we view a lot of things and make us go about them more reasonably instead of inserting discrimination wherever we see a difference between demographics though a lot of difference can also be chalked up to a difference in culture which is another thing a lot of people fail to address.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Lobster Cult High Priest, Mr Cuddles, Local Fed and 1 other person
Atomsk said:
Well for one, I don't think we'd be discriminating against Asians and Whites when it comes to college selection if it was just common knowledge that some races have lower IQ's so it's not racism that's keeping them from getting into college.
Click to expand...
It's common knowledge that men are bigger and stronger than women on average and yet it's still seen as ok to discriminate against men when it comes to physically demanding jobs.

You underestimate the zeal of leftist cultists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6thRanger, Lobster Cult High Priest, Local Fed and 2 others
Disclaimer, if I'm driving this thread into an autism fest, I'm sorry, let me know and I'll stop.
Atomsk said:
Well for one, I don't think we'd be discriminating against Asians and Whites when it comes to college selection if it was just common knowledge that some races have lower IQ's so it's not racism that's keeping them from getting into college. I feel like seeing the reality of the situation would change how we view a lot of things and make us go about them more reasonably instead of inserting discrimination wherever we see a difference between demographics though a lot of difference can also be chalked up to a difference in culture which is another thing a lot of people fail to address.
Click to expand...
Playing along (my real opinion is that no race is biologically less intelligent) but assuming some are, doesn't our country benefit overall from giving everyone an equal opportunity at achieving the highest level of education that they want to achieve? I'm assuming you're referring to affirmative action, which I don't support if it means taking spots from higher achievers just to give to lower minority achievers, but I do support if it means trying to intervene when roadblocks (like drug addicted parents or a single mom who works 2 jobs and asks their teenage child to babysit the little kids) are preventing people from doing their best.

I'm ok with pushing back against affirmative action, I just feel like a lot of people just leave it at that and don't offer a good alternative.
Freesia said:
It's common knowledge that men are bigger and stronger than women on average and yet it's still seen as ok to discriminate against men when it comes to physically demanding jobs.

You underestimate the zeal of leftist cultists.
Click to expand...
Aren't like 90% of construction workers men? Can you please clarify?
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
  • Winner
Reactions: Chilson, Lobster Cult High Priest, Cisna H. Scumale and 2 others
Noom Boom said:
Aren't like 90% of construction workers men? Can you please clarify?
Click to expand...
Just look up affirmative action programs. For pretty much every position from firefighter to cop to soldier to whatever actually requires someone pass a physical exam, there are lower standards for women. There's tons of programs designed specifically to increase the number of women at any costs. Hell, remember when the first female Ranger got through because they lowered the standards so much and it was so important that Obama had to congratulate the women in person and held an entire speech over it?

If you convince leftists that race and IQ are tied the only thing they'll do is lower the standards for blacks and say whites have genetic privilege and need to pay more taxes or something. That's essentially what they've been doing for the last 100 years or so anyway.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Iamthatis, CheetoDust, Strange Looking Dog and 4 others
Noom Boom said:
Disclaimer, if I'm driving this thread into an autism fest, I'm sorry, let me know and I'll stop.

Playing along (my real opinion is that no race is biologically less intelligent) but assuming some are, doesn't our country benefit overall from giving everyone an equal opportunity at achieving the highest level of education that they want to achieve? I'm assuming you're referring to affirmative action, which I don't support if it means taking spots from higher achievers just to give to lower minority achievers, but I do support if it means trying to intervene when roadblocks (like drug addicted parents or a single mom who works 2 jobs and asks their teenage child to babysit the little kids) are preventing people from doing their best.

I'm ok with pushing back against affirmative action, I just feel like a lot of people just leave it at that and don't offer a good alternative.

Aren't like 90% of construction workers men? Can you please clarify?
Click to expand...
I disagree with you because they should be working on improving their own countries rather than taking advantage of the programs here. White Europeans generally have a high trust society and can be socially shamed into not advantage of welfare and other programs. Other cultures aren’t as high trust, so when they come here it puts our own clans and tribes at a disadvantage.

Socialism is a white mans ideology but it must be tempered with promoting traditional values which maintain a high trust society.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Political Sperging
Reactions: Woke Blue Muttlema, Iamthatis, m1ddl3m4rch and 7 others
Freesia said:
Just look up affirmative action programs. For pretty much every position from firefighter to cop to soldier to whatever actually requires someone pass a physical exam, there are lower standards for women. There's tons of programs designed specifically to increase the number of women at any costs. Hell, remember when the first female Ranger got through because they lowered the standards so much and it was so important that Obama had to congratulate the women in person and held an entire speech over it?
Click to expand...
Ok, so if we are going to separate jobs that require a physical fitness test from those that do not, I'll address this in 2 parts.
1) Jobs such as construction or oil rig workers have no formal test naturally sort themselves out to be majority male and therefore men are not being discriminated against.
2) The only jobs I could find that have strict physical ability tests were, as you mentioned, firefighter, police, and military. From some quick searching (correct me if I'm wrong) female firefighters are held to the same physical standards as males, so no male discrimination going on there. You are correct that female police and military members have a lower pass threshold than men, but I counter that the benefits of having a more diverse police/military force outweigh the compromise of lowering the physical requirement.

Some benefits of having female police;
-Consistently rated as more trusted by their communities, therefore improving police relationships
-Statistically more likely to have higher interpersonal skills, therefore excelling in certain policing practices like de-escalation
-Women are found to have a calming affect on male partners, resulting in fewer police deaths

Additionally in the military each branch has different requirements.
-In the Marines, women are held to a lower standard on the PFT for initial admission, but the same standard on the CFT, which they must pass to participate in physical combat
-In the army, all members are required to get a 360 on the ACFT, however, anyone may choose to use a combination of scores on different exercises that they feel best suit their own ability
-In the Navy and Air Force, women can pass boot camp and combat entrance at a lower level, so there's two
- In the Coast Guard women are held to the same standard on some, but not all, tests

Now I can agree that allowing lower physical standards for combat roles is not a good idea (though again, that is not the case in the Marines or Army) but allowing lower standard in initial admission allows the best person for the job in less physical roles like piolets, medics, support, engineers, etc.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Informative
Reactions: not william stenchever, Iamthatis, m1ddl3m4rch and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back