Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
Found a Destiny fan today.

A coworker was "debating" at work. He was insisting that Alec Baldwin had zero responsibility in killing another person. My guy's primary source and inspiration for his argument was Destiny. And he had no time to consider the perspective that Baldwin does vear responsibility; then thought he proved his point and won when I became incredulous when he used a apples and oranges comparison to the Nazis to prove his point.

Afterwards he went on about how he doesn't like to "debate" ethics because that is too deep a rabbit hole and suggested that I should just debate on his terms and not on ethics. I have no fucking idea what this dude was going on about; but he was tying himself into knots to defend a guy that didn't check his gun before shooting someone.

All I know is that internet "debaters" have ruined debate for entire generations of people. They want to go in and win and spike the football and have no interest in learning about the arguments and positions being discussed. I feel dumber for spending ten minutes listening to this guy stroke his ego.
Sounds like you lost a debate and now all your coworkers think you're a loser. Sad!
 
Here we go again
Things of note: he thought about getting a restraining order on her but it's hard to do with just the digital stuff; he thought about making a manifesto on her for Twitch staff, but he thinks they would do anything about it (probably true)
Thought about calling her parents (and her school) :story:
Acknowledges that for Ana any interaction with him is good interaction
Says his best hope to resolve this issue (which in his head is to get Ana banned from Twitch) is someone winning a DMCA counterclaim against Ana in court, which he says he would bankroll

Honestly I'm getting bored of this Ana shit - there are no new developments, it's just two of them trying to outwhine each other on who's the bigger victim here. Go back to shitting on lefties Steven, get at them commie trannies
 
Lets just ignore the tens to hundreds of thousands of years of evolution that has created obvious, and less obvious, variances between different groups of humans born in different environments for the sake of "equality".

It certainly has done wonders on the collapsing western societies.
How exactly is it possible to believe in evolution but not "race realism", I don't even like that term because it's just reality and the people going around and saying they're race realists are usually spergs. Let's not fall for the single cause fallacy and put absolutely everything on genetics but to not consider them at all is ridiculous, if you're trying to solve a problem and you completely remove genetics as a variable when it surely is one, you're never going to solve that problem. Also, when you just ignore reality, you allow the side talking about it to interpret it. "Race Realism" does not have to be about proving that the niggers are inferior and saying we should send them all back to Africa but a lot of liberals and progressives already bought into that interpretation and reason that if "race realism" is true then their conclusions on what to do with that information is also true. It became that way because instead of accepting reality and creating counter-narratives, they just allowed another group to completely own those facts.
 
How exactly is it possible to believe in evolution but not "race realism", I don't even like that term because it's just reality and the people going around and saying they're race realists are usually spergs. Let's not fall for the single cause fallacy and put absolutely everything on genetics but to not consider them at all is ridiculous, if you're trying to solve a problem and you completely remove genetics as a variable when it surely is one, you're never going to solve that problem. Also, when you just ignore reality, you allow the side talking about it to interpret it. "Race Realism" does not have to be about proving that the niggers are inferior and saying we should send them all back to Africa but a lot of liberals and progressives already bought into that interpretation and reason that if "race realism" is true then their conclusions on what to do with that information is also true. It became that way because instead of accepting reality and creating counter-narratives, they just allowed another group to completely own those facts.
This is what is holding me back. I find no benefit to treating people differently either interpersonally or through government policy by their race. We are a diverse country and will continue to be, so when looking at problems like murder or something the question is, how do we proceed? We cannot have different laws based on race. We can only address "soft" factors like culture and socioeconomic conditions, and that could affect multiple races.

So what is really the benefit of calling yourself a race realist and arguing for it?
 
This is what is holding me back. I find no benefit to treating people differently either interpersonally or through government policy by their race. We are a diverse country and will continue to be, so when looking at problems like murder or something the question is, how do we proceed? We cannot have different laws based on race. We can only address "soft" factors like culture and socioeconomic conditions, and that could affect multiple races.

So what is really the benefit of calling yourself a race realist and arguing for it?
1. You just have autism and value the truth for its own sake.

2. You oppose liberalism in its entirety and don't value equality under the law.

Or, 3. You think enduring short term enmity is worth it for the long term social stability provided by the widespread acceptance that racial disparities aren't anyone's fault.

Kind of a moot point because the most likely outcome is that the country will continue to imbibe lies and descend into racial violence. But those are the main three off the top of my head.
 
Last edited:
This is what is holding me back. I find no benefit to treating people differently either interpersonally or through government policy by their race. We are a diverse country and will continue to be, so when looking at problems like murder or something the question is, how do we proceed? We cannot have different laws based on race. We can only address "soft" factors like culture and socioeconomic conditions, and that could affect multiple races.

So what is really the benefit of calling yourself a race realist and arguing for it?
Imagine if ground on occasion shook, destroyed buildings and killed people. And as a solution your society was sacrificing virgins to a volcano god.
Think of all the activism, all the "movements", all the mindspace taken up in peoples heads about race. Think of all the destruction of race riots of not just last year, but decades before. Think of all the common criminality that doesn't get dealt with, that sometimes ruins a persons life, and makes your society a shittier place in day to day life. Every one of these things is justified if you share the systems current assumptions and their solutions.

Maybe the problems are natural, and need to be coped with, rather than solved. Maybe it's time to stop sacrificing virgins, and build earthquake resistant homes.
 
Back to NFT shilling: Nicholas DeOrio, gf faker extraordinaire, who can't seem to take Tiny's dick out of his mouth for the last couple of months, to the point of doing (1,2) the "incest is moraly neutral" thing on his streams, has bought some NFTs from the site Destiny was shilling and showed what it actually looks like:
tinysig.PNG
That "autograph" alone is worth every dollar, I'm sure


 
When Destiny shills for mainstream media and you get to read articles like:

Also he's stuck between a rock and a hard place. He likes to shit on alternative media and many times gives "mainstream media" a pass. But in Kyle Rittenhouse trial, you could clearly see that he had no intention of defending them knowing that:
1. NBC made a video where they backtracked on many of their statements after verdict and what they have gotten wrong about the trial (since it was convenient).
2. Was it New york times that labeled Kyle as white supremacist? And later it was found there was no evidence of such, only some vague link to proud boys.
3. Biden, a president that Destiny likes to shill for, called Kyle Rittenhouse a white supremacist knowing it's just a populist talking point & vice president Kamala Harris also criticized the verdict. Pretty ironic coming from an ex prosecutor that put Afroamericans into prison for possessing weed.

I give Destiny full credit for defending Kyle and going up against batshit crazy progressives. But cant help but think that he holds part of responsibility for caused shitstorm by prompting up mainstream media, that has a giant influence over spread of information, and then he wonders why does it create so many brainwashed progressives that labeled Kyle as murderer. He helped prompting up dumb fucks like Hasan and Vaush and then wonders why is the other side so brainwashed. I think now he's a lot more self aware, specially because he had to deal with many lefties on these weird panels.

We'll see how midterms 2022 plays out, but judging by Virginia results, you wanna keep the progressive ideas of low iq breadtubers as far away as possible from the Democrats.
 
Surprised this one hasn't been put up, but Destiny had a debate with Martinez Perspective the other day on the Politically Provoked channel on the topic of the Great Replacement .



I may be biased but I think Martinez took this one easily. It was shocking how poorly Destiny did, most likely because he didn't take it seriously and, in my opinion, doesn't actually disagree with the central premise that it is occurring.
Martinez opens with a string of quotes designed to back up his point, and Destiny actually complained that citing sources was a debate trick and he shouldn't be expected to under stand them. He also admitted to not even listening to them later on and had to have them repeated.
 
Last edited:
Surprised this one hasn't been put up, but Destiny had a debate with Martinez Perspective the other day on the Politically Provoked channel on the topic of the Great Replacement .



I may be biased but I think Martinez took this one easily. It was shocking how poorly Destiny did, most likely because he didn't take it seriously and, in my opinion, doesn't actually disagree with the central premise that it is occurring. Like his conflict with the Left he only seems to disagree with them on very specific actions.
Martinez opens with a string of quotes designed to back up his point, and Destiny actually complained that citing sources was a debate trick and he shouldn't be expected to under stand them. He also admitted to not even listening to them later on and had to have them repeated. As far as I could see Destiny didn't even end up debating the Great Replacement was occurring, his stance became that unless anyone could provide the minutes from the meeting of the illuminati that say they are doing this on purpose, there's no reason to believe it isn't just some giant natural coincidence.

He also took the puzzling stance that the thing itself is good, but if it were being put upon the public by a bureaucratic or elite group then it would be bad. So to him it's only bad if it's by design, but refused to believe designs could be made by the important or influential people who were quoted. It was a weird showing.
Nah, I'd say its a stalemate. Anyone coming into their beliefs on the great replacement would've had their mind unchanged. Martinez comes off as a sperg who thinks mere statements is white genocide Jewish conspiracy, which fuels the idea that the great replacement is hysterical nonsense to the liberals. Meanwhile, Gnome Fuck just ridiculed and questioned the subject without actually disproving that the population makeup shift leading to a non-white majority and a drastic culture shift would be a bad thing. Which means GR believers remain unconvinced.

Pretty boring debate all round.
 
I think Destiny has spent so much time debating brain rotted Twitter-tier leftoids that hes forgot how to debate Rightoids. He might need to relearn how to debate them again but judging the state that hes in these days, I seriously doubt he has enough motivation to do any real reading/theory. Would rather dunk on twitterTards, get into relationship drama with teen girls and smoke meth.
 
Back