Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Stepping Down, Report Says

[Rekkington]

Since when did pajeets care about muzzies, given their numba one enemy next door has nukes aimed right at it.

Turns out the Nazis were right again when they say despite geopolitical differences, it's gonna be Brown Solidarity all the way when White people are involved.

 

[Dynamite Bean]

Like others have said, I hope twitter becomes even more of an unfun shithole that it causes all artists and other entertainment related hobbies to fuck off and go somewhere with less political bullshit or band together and try to create their own dedicated art platform(although that often never works)

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

To be fair, twitter is a global platform. American-run social media dictates acceptable discourse worldwide.

The danger of equivocation is that it "to be fair"s us all into accepting a literal foreigner deciding what political or social views will be censored in the public square. Regardless of private ownership or global reach, Twitter is functioning as a public square and is founded and based in the States. Twitter censorship affects elections, so their platform should be forced not to censor free speech or else be considered liable for content due to editorializing.

 

[The Magnificence]

Can we get a poll on who's gonna replace Jack?

Woman
"Woman"
Woman of color
(((Woman)))
They/Them Genderblob
Pajeet

You know, it's both sexist and racist for you to assu--

It's Pajeet

Twitter CTO Parag Agrawal will replace Jack Dorsey as new CEO

Twitter confirms that CEO Jack Dorsey will step down as CEO effective immediately; CTO Parag Agrawal named CEO and member of Twitter's board.

insiderpaper.com

Twitter superpower 2020

...right, carry on, then.

 

[Ishtar]

Well that means Donald Trump is definitely not being re elected in 2024.

 

[Happy Fish]

Oh boy. I can't wait for Twitter to suck even more.

 

[The Magnificence]

The danger of equivocation is that it "to be fair"s us all into accepting a literal foreigner deciding what political or social views will be censored in the public square. Regardless of private ownership or global reach, Twitter is functioning as a public square and is founded and based in the States. Twitter censorship affects elections, so their platform should be forced not to censor free speech or else be considered liable for content due to editorializing.

Slippery slope, my friend. With all due respect, if that argument flew today, then tomorrow the same argument would be used to shut down Kiwi Farms as a privately owned "public square" that has "literally been weaponized to bully and has driven people to suicide" or some such.

 

[Rekkington]

Oh boy. I can't wait for Twitter to suck even more.

Across the internet, trannies are scrambling to answer the question "wait where are we at with Indian guys?"

 

[Unassuming Local Guy]

If you are on Twitter and aren't either far left or using it strictly for business reasons, you are a retard.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

Slippery slope, my friend. With all due respect, if that argument flew today, then tomorrow the same argument would be used to shut down Kiwi Farms as a privately owned "public square" that has "literally been weaponized to bully and has driven people to suicide" or some such.

The Farms is far more committed to free speech than any other site, and thus are not liable for content. And that would have to pass a judge, which it wouldn't. Enforcing a hands off neutrality policy on Twitter would be a win.

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

Everyone losing their mind over the new CEO being brown forgets that the last CEO, a white American, let twitter go to shit and most people engaging in political censorship are white lefties.

Since when did pajeets care about muzzies, given their numba one enemy next door has nukes aimed right at it.

Many pajeets are muzzies.

The danger of equivocation is that it "to be fair"s us all into accepting a literal foreigner deciding what political or social views will be censored in the public square. Regardless of private ownership or global reach, Twitter is functioning as a public square and is founded and based in the States. Twitter censorship affects elections, so their platform should be forced not to censor free speech or else be considered liable for content due to editorializing.

I see your point. Yeah, twitter shouldn't be allowed to censor political dissent. Censorship could be an issue no matter the ethnicity of who's in charge, though.

 

[Neurotypical Mantis]

welp, goodbye twitter
and to the users who haven't been banned for breathing the wrong way

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

Everyone losing their mind over the new CEO being brown forgets that the last CEO, a white American, let twitter go to shit and most people engaging in political censorship are white lefties.


Many pajeets are muzzies.


I see your point. Yeah, twitter shouldn't be allowed to censor political dissent. Censorship could be an issue no matter the ethnicity of who's in charge, though.

We don't let foreign born people be president. We shouldn't let foreign born people, as the new Twitter CEO was born in India, be in charge of domestic politics. Unless I'm mistaken and he's an American citizen by birth.

Why are you defending indians? Pajeets are all daleet to the rest of the world. The funniest thing is some of them think they're better than the rest.

 

[comfysocks]

Wonder if this has anything to do with the walled garden gayops that Microsoft and Facebook got exposed on.

 

[The Magnificence]

The Farms is far more committed to free speech than any other site, and thus are not liable for content. And that would have to pass a judge, which it wouldn't. Enforcing a hands off neutrality policy on Twitter would be a win.

Enforced by who or what? Who are you entrusting this power to?

I am not saying you don't have a point, I am saying I do not see how it is realistically enforceable w/o undesirable side effects.

 

[YourFriendlyLurker]

If he gonna be SJW scum - more lulz. If he is gonna be super based chud who restores Trump account - more lulz. We win either way, kiwis.

 

[DriveByTrolling]

Across the internet, trannies are scrambling to answer the question "wait where are we at with Indian guys?"

Those Indian men will goat fuck anything, so the troons might be in a good position here.

 

[Dom Cruise]

Your website ruined the entire world, thanks Jack!

 

[Aib Ld]

I only have a Twitter because of most artists only having it as a place for commissions, and I still don't know why* they picked it when Twitter is obviously not an art gallery site and I am forced to scrolls over pages and pages of reaction/food/whatever pics just to see one pic they drew, and have to scroll through more trash to see more pics.
*I do know, dopamine rush on seeing big numbers on people liking their stuff and echo chambers, I've seen plently of artists fall to that.
Edit to add something I forgot to add and fix words

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

We don't let foreign born people be president. We shouldn't let foreign born people, as the new Twitter CEO was born in India, be in charge of domestic politics. Unless I'm mistaken and he's an American citizen by birth.

Maybe. I doubt this guy has bad intentions, but I could see foreign influence becoming a real problem if people from an enemy nation took over key positions at twitter. Right now there's no laws preventing something like that from happening as far as I know.

Why are you defending indians? Pajeets are all daleet to the rest of the world. The funniest thing is some of them think they're better than the rest.

I just think obsessing over race generally does more harm than good, whether it's blacks crying about da honkeys or whites complaining about niggers. Mindset is what makes the biggest difference when it comes to stuff like this.