Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Does professional shitposting pay well? I need to know how much I need to improve my shitposting skills
You want the truth or a joke?
You need close to 40 karma ratio to get like $1 in MOON. You would need tens of thousands of karma a month to make $1k, but there's only a 15000 cap. Now you have to answer yourself this, is posting on Reddit worth it?
 
Honestly, this is yet one big brain moment for Melissa. I think I've asked this from her in the past, but what is she going to do if she somehow gets some IPs from Kazakhstan or w/e? It wouldn't surprise me even if she thought there was some sort of phonebook full of which person uses which ip.
She's too dumb to do anything with it. The silly bitch has been choked and hatefucked so much she has suffered brain damage.
 
New Mel doc in the appellate court
image-000001.png
image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png
image-000005.png
image-000006.png
image-000007.png
image-000008.png
image-000009.png
image-000010.png
image-000011.png
image-000012.png
image-000013.png
image-000014.png
image-000015.png
image-000016.png
image-000017.png
image-000018.png
image-000019.png
image-000020.png
image-000021.png
image-000022.png
image-000023.png
image-000024.png

Melinda I'll sell you Useful Mistakes ip for $1,000 USD hit me up.
Sell it for $1,000 USD and butthole pics which you can then sell to @Baby Yoda for another $1,000 USD
 

Attachments

"But your Honor, Ashley Hutsell-Jankowski's fevered obsession with child rape and pedophilia needs to be part of the lawsuit, even though the claims are both bullshit and legally irrelevant to the case!"

It's worth noting that Melinda has admitted in private communications that she hasn't done a single minute of research into these claims, and is just taking the lovely Ashley Hutsell Jankowski's fantasies at face value. Because both of them desperately want them to be true. And in Ashley's case (and probably Melinda's), she doesn't care if they're true or not. Ashley will use any cudgel to strike people she hates. Truth is irrelevant to Ashley.

ETA: Ashley has rated this autistic on her newest sock, because of course she has. Every autistic sticker she awards gets her one step closer to bringing the site down, and towards the inevitable communist takeover of America.
 
Last edited:
Screenshot 2021-11-30 144215.png
"Accusing the opposite party of being a pedophile and a massive criminal is in no way scandalous, no way about Moon, and totally relevant"

Like her citations just prove her wrong, and her words are contradictory.

Screenshot 2021-11-30 144608.png
Screenshot 2021-11-30 144700.png
Screenshot 2021-11-30 144920.png
Screenshot 2021-11-30 144813.png
Screenshot 2021-11-30 144939.png
Screenshot 2021-11-30 145245.png
The case she cited literally is where the Appeals courted affirmed Rule 11 violations, and in part affirmed the sanctions (by directing the court to read the arguments of the appellate court and issue a new sanction) for multiple irrelevant and scandalous allegations. It literally hurts Mel's case to cite this

Screenshot 2021-11-30 145829.png
 
I doubt she actually thinks that @Useful_Mistake is actually Hardin. I think it was just another desperate attempt to get identifying information on any active participant in this thread.
Never underestimate the power of mental illness. Claiming posters here are people they know offline is actually typical for schizophrenic and schizotypal POIs here: Dana claims "Suzy" posts in her thread, Mel claims "Hardin" posts here, Pam had entire legion of celebrities posting in her thread.

She does seem as much of a schizo as Pam sometimes.
Pam had a little different method, she was connecting content of posts to "identity" of the poster (sex - Harvey, psychology - Richard, computers - Pierre, politics - Donny). Mel and Dana stick to "identities" they came up with for specific accounts.

I dunno she likes being choked maybe she likes being demeaned, humiliated, and embarrassed too.
Humiliation fetish is a thing...
 
New Mel doc in the appellate court
Dear fucking Yahooey, Mel. Excessive screeching about 8chan has moved wholly to the courts now.

I don’t understand why there is one section in this mess that she double spaced when the rest is single spaced. I doubted she ever proofread her shit, but this just proves it.
 
Melinda continues to quote mine on her site. Deut 25.2
What she has.
Flogging
By a 3rd party and with written consent

full is
then it shall be, if the wicked man deserve to be beaten, that
the judge shall cause him to lie down, and to be
beaten before his face, according to the measure
of his wickedness, by number.

Taken from my copy of the Tanakh. Translated from the Leningrad Codex unless older text was found for a part. However the Leningrad Codex is the oldest complete version.
 
Oh look. She's changed up her formatting. I'm sure that will impress the 4th Circuit as she skreeches Color of Law and Crazy at them. All the basic law book definitions of facts will help too. But there does not appear to be any arguments or matters to which the appelate court would even concern itself in this screed. "Facts are not Scandalous!" Well yeah bitch. But you haven't presented any facts. You've presented salacious crap of which you have no direct knowledge or proof and claimed them to be facts. You've presented your conclusions. Not facts.

And no you are not a lawyer. You don't have the ethical obligations of a Lawyer. Thus the Court has no obligation to treat or trust your unsworn statements as factual or truthful. The shit you're producing is sanctionable.
 
"Facts are not Scandalous!"
Irrelevant facts can still be scandalous. See, ironically, In re Kunstler, 914 F.2d 505 (4th Cir. 1990).
And no you are not a lawyer. You don't have the ethical obligations of a Lawyer. Thus the Court has no obligation to treat or trust your unsworn statements as factual or truthful. The shit you're producing is sanctionable.
This is sanctionable even if you are a lawyer. Again, see In re Kunstler.
 
Last edited:
Back